Skip to content

Posts from [QUESTION] Auto-translated

No ratings yet — be the first to rate!
Closed
Does changing an item's name to that of another item affect its properties?
9 voters
Single choice Public votes Closed 2012-02-02
This poll is closed.
Yes, it changes.
44.4% 4 votes
No, it doesn’t change.
55.6% 5 votes
User Avatar
#16
Auto-translated
It doesn't mean that it isn't used.
Смысла нет, но вы держитесь там. Удачи, здоровья, хорошего настроения!
И пока в кармане пачка милкиуэйев - значит все не так уж плохо на сегодняшний день



User Avatar
#17
Auto-translated
They also say "their," instead of "their," for example. This is also incorrect, as is such generalization.

Стартовый пост - Квенты - Разное - Список НПС -
Резара - Аксель - Орвальд - ЭмилияСтэфания - Амвросий - ЛестерАльсираАлария

User Avatar
#18
Auto-translated
They also say "ikhniy" instead of "ikh," for example. That's also incorrect, as is such generalization.
These are completely different situations. In the case of "ikhniy," it's perfectly clear what the person meant; they just said it in a, shall we say, rural way. I'd better not express myself further, or they might misunderstand me again.
User Avatar
#19
Auto-translated
These are completely different situations.
I wasn't comparing them. I used it as an example of another type of incorrect phrasing. In other words, it's said like that, but it's still incorrect.

Стартовый пост - Квенты - Разное - Список НПС -
Резара - Аксель - Орвальд - ЭмилияСтэфания - Амвросий - ЛестерАльсираАлария

User Avatar
#20
Auto-translated
yeah, that's true)
User Avatar
#21
Auto-translated
In most fantasy settings, male warriors are dressed practically, comfortably, and in accordance with the environment. But female characters usually flaunt all their attractive features, and their clothing is minimal. This is a cliché, due to the fact that the vast majority of authors and consumers of this type of content are male. From an outside perspective, it looks comical, and that's why the fitting term "boob plate" was coined.
It's unlikely that the author of your artwork, Revan, was interested in how and with what this elf would fight the enemy, or how she would defend herself from bandits. He was clearly interested in a couple of curves, which usually fit into a boob plate.
User Avatar
#22
Auto-translated
Yes, a bralette is an item of clothing, not just a concept.
User Avatar
#23
Auto-translated
In most fantasy settings, male warriors are dressed practically, comfortably, and in accordance with the environment.
Especially mages in uncomfortable robes and paladins/dark warriors in who-knows-what? But the clothing is more concealing, yes.
User Avatar
#24
Auto-translated
paladins/dark knights in who-knows-what?
But they are wearing full plate armor.
And mages, for some reason, can't wear pants like normal people.
Where do we go?
Where do we end up when we save the world?
User Avatar
#25
Auto-translated
Practicality in all aspects.


Nevertheless, if the first character were a girl, even with a covered chest, it would certainly be said that "the author was probably more interested in how and in what this character would fight the enemy, and how she would defend herself from bandits. He was very obviously interested in a pair of curves that usually fit in a bra."

Стартовый пост - Квенты - Разное - Список НПС -
Резара - Аксель - Орвальд - ЭмилияСтэфания - Амвросий - ЛестерАльсираАлария

User Avatar
#26
Auto-translated
I’ll tell you right now that Conan the Barbarian is dressed rather impractically. And so is Xena, for that matter.
Where do we go?
Where do we end up when we save the world?
User Avatar
#27
Auto-translated
I'll tell you right now that Conan the Barbarian is dressed rather impractically. And so is Xena.
But why isn't Conan?
Xena (at least in this frame) has perfectly ordinary armor. It reminds me of Roman armor.

Стартовый пост - Квенты - Разное - Список НПС -
Резара - Аксель - Орвальд - ЭмилияСтэфания - Амвросий - ЛестерАльсираАлария

User Avatar
#28
Auto-translated
Conan doesn't have a breastplate here, but rather armored underwear. But on Xeen, that's exactly what we're talking about.
User Avatar
#29
Auto-translated
Why isn't Conan here?
Because he's naked.
Xena (at least in this frame) has very ordinary armor. It looks like Roman armor.
The part at the elbows is exposed, which is easily hit by a sword, and the shoulders, where a sword can hit even accidentally. The chest is exposed; if a sword gets in there, death will be quick.
Where do we go?
Where do we end up when we save the world?
User Avatar
#30
Auto-translated
Because he is naked.
Okay, let's look at this not from the perspective of practicality, but from the perspective of logic. Is such an outfit logical for this character?
The elbow area is exposed, which is easily vulnerable to a sword, and the shoulders, where a sword can hit even accidentally. The chest is exposed; if a sword gets through, death will be quick.

Not the lightest version of Roman armor. Nevertheless, the elbow area, as well as the legs, are exposed. Even if you put a woman in this armor, you can again say that the author was only thinking about showing off the character's seductive legs. And in general, at that time, many soldiers wore clothes that covered far from all parts of the body. But why? After all, their creators weren't thinking about the curves of the soldiers, were they?

Стартовый пост - Квенты - Разное - Список НПС -
Резара - Аксель - Орвальд - ЭмилияСтэфания - Амвросий - ЛестерАльсираАлария