Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Elm, can you name other players who have angels on level 1 in at least half of their games? Or are there no players that strong?) It's not even a rule to have them on level 2.
Added 1 minute ago
4. Game against OUTLAW_HW. 8xM12A - I placed angels, and on turn 121, I had 8 of them. I bought everything except for 1 feather, and the opponent came to rush me with an army from the first week and didn't give me time to build up. Saves...
Yes, the saves would be very interesting. Was it due to bugged paths, perhaps?
Good thing he’s being honest at least. 8xm12 stands apart. There’s almost as much gold lying around as on Jebus Cross. I remember playing with Alex — he managed to fit in Angels on 200% and buy them out)))
Angels are often built on the second turn, even when not playing as Castle.
By the way, what I'm writing is far from new; if you read the history in "TACTICS," you'll see it. /topic/at/216853/
Alex once placed Angels on Panic at level 126 and upgraded them to 132. I had a game with a balance of 130 and also put Angels down on the first turn. However, it didn't pay off in the end because I later broke through into the treasure zone. But in Warlords Tactics (WT), everything is simpler.
In general, this is an alternative to a level 7 rush, but Castle has poor rushing capabilities; heroes often lack logistics, and there are only 3-5 units of levels 3-5.
Here are saves with Outlaw and Andre.
P.S. The Stinger-Lord Dim match was a mistake. Dima had 14 archers on template 8mm6a at level 124, but Stinger ultimately won.
So I thought as much. Theory turns out to differ from reality. Especially since on the previous page the tone of the post was as if the Great Guru had deigned to teach mere mortals a thing or two.
But it turned out he himself didn't manage it often, actually only once and that was on a money shuffle. The fact that someone had 14 archers is admittedly a brilliant example worthy of respect. But that happens once in 50 games. (if even that often) Oelm
4. I, personally, believe that Castle with a horses build is complete crap, even worse than Tower, which is unanimously considered the weakest town in 8mm6.
and that one really made me smile. of course, who needs them.. who needs tempo and taking Dragon Fly Hives, conservatories, and money banks to build those same archers, right?
Angels are of course the main priority when playing Castle. But I think most people get them by week 3 anyway.
P.S. I wouldn't stir up this stink, but it seemed to me that in the criticism of Stickey's (and not only Stickey's) game there was more desire for self-affirmation than pointing out actual mistakes. Newbies read this thread too. And what can they think when some guy lays it out so confidently and authoritatively? - they take it as a manual for action. In short, what came out was a desire to pass off a subjective opinion as dogma.
Can the claque do anything else besides spewing garbage?
If a person has played like crap, I’ll call it like they played crap, even if they’re a champion in Heroes. I really didn’t like Slavina’s play in this particular game — for many reasons, not just what I wrote about. For those who see this as self-assertion, feel free to stick to your own opinion. On the contrary, if I have a bad attitude toward someone, I’ll never comment on their game in life — I won’t waste my time on them.
It looks completely asinine to demand statistical requirements for all HL+U templates just to twist the results afterward. I collected statistics not only from online play. In the end, it turned out — Forrest is wrong. I, for sure, am also wrong. Yavdet is right. He confidently asserted himself in the selection for the HeroesWorld 2012 cup from 20 people.
Why don't you play a match, Javdet + Turis + horse building against Oelm + Valya without horses (building is prohibited). And another option - Javdet + castle + horses against Oelm + tower. Let's see if
castle with horse building is really complete garbage, even worse than the tower, which is unanimously considered the weakest castle in 8mm6.
Награда: Лучшему игроку сезона Осень 2009 за замок Конфлюкс
Thanks for the suggestions, Kostya, but I don't play with Yavdet. And most importantly, you proposed a pointless argument – if the situation is such that it's advantageous to deploy griffins, am I supposed to deploy angels instead? What's the point of these concessions? If I have to choose between two options, for example, where a castle is forbidden from building knights at all/forbidden from building angels at all, then of course I would choose the first. We can also consider playing castle against castle. I can play castle against tower with you, by the way.
"Is the claque capable of anything other than just spewing nonsense?"
Didn't you know the saying, "Leave it alone, or it will stink"? About a month ago, you started actively stirring up trouble with the "Javdet" account, which was quietly lying there and not bothering anyone. Now, smell the consequences.
By the way, CLACK, -и, f. People hired to applaud performers or speakers, or to boo them, in order to create the impression of success or failure of a performance.
How we love ourselves:D a performer, applause, success:D :D :D
"In the end, it turned out that Forrest was wrong."
- Where, where, where did you see that?? :D
And about this: "Slavin's game in this particular match didn't appeal to me at all - in many respects, not just what I wrote about."
Whose game have you ever liked besides your own? A couple of years ago, I made the mistake of giving you a save file, which ultimately led to a pointless debate and a tirade about how great you are. Knowing you, there's no reason to expect anything other than self-admiration and self-affirmation (and even that is just in theory).
Just don't immediately refer specifically to that game. And I've read comments on the forum more than once, like, "How can you still not take the Moon Medusa in online games?" Sometimes I read the chat, and in the chat, Indra is everything: both the "chat server" and the main critic of everything that is happening, and an obligatory participant in any argument.
With that, I bid you farewell. Until our next meeting. The plastic world has won.
I have the following problem: I can't start the game – it gets stuck while retrieving headers from the host. I've tried using GameRanger and Hamachi, with players from different countries (with one of them, the ping was quite normal, around 90ms), and on two different versions of the game. What could be the problem? The firewall is disabled.
I have a problem here: I can't start the game - it gets stuck while retrieving headers from the host. I tried using GR and Hamachi, with players from different countries (with one of them, the ping was quite normal, ~90ms), and on two different versions of the game. What could be the problem?
Could it be the Antivirus? Try adding HoMM3, GR, and Hamachi to the list of exceptions. And do the versions match with your opponent?