Auto-translated
This is incorrect.
New here? I'm Roha — want a quick tour?
There's no logical thinking here. The information is "Vasya is innocent." You can't just throw that into the discussion like that. And in general, read the rules further, don't take things out of context.
You ignored the randomness, good job. That's what you should do – be afraid to admit you're wrong, and only quote things you can find an answer to.
And you know, hundreds of people play psychological Mafia. Maybe even thousands.
I've said everything. The information is known to everyone.
You may not even realize it, but the first impression is subconsciously remembered, and then even the behavior seems suspicious.
And I wasn't talking about psychology, because it's precisely psychology that would make it easy to see the world in Jace. I'm talking about ontology.
It's dragging on. I suggest we drop it. You see that I only had a sensible topic in the first post, and now I have to lower the logical bar in response to a similar lowering of the bar by the other person.
Yes, I'm into the drawn girls from LoL. (not all of them)
That's incorrect.
You are foolishly taking a single sentence out of context and using it as a rule, I'm telling you again.
Will there be any constructive input, or will you just Google yourself a decent brain – then we can chat, I'd be glad to.
You've completely convinced me. Of course, some rules aren't really rules; they don't need to be followed.
I'm too stupid; I don't know how to Google. Okay, I'll chat with you sometime, if you're constructive and occasionally acknowledge the possibility of being wrong, instead of living in your narrow little world, securely walled off from other opinions.
-You should have tried bribing me with cookies instead of trying to set me up! – said an angry Jack, handing the violin back to Kosha, which she had forgotten at his house yesterday.