Pit for LM
Auto-translated
To axelle.
Thank you very much for your messages. I am very pleased that some players on the Chinese side also doubt the correctness of the decision regarding my first game and have the courage to admit it. Respect. And I am very sorry that axelle is experiencing problems on his forum because of this.
Let me explain the rules. In advance, 10 maps for 3 players are generated. Red is the judge and is forcibly placed in a part of the map where he does not interfere or change the layout. From there, he can monitor all the players' actions. In my opinion, the layouts are quite balanced, and the bugs have been removed (for example, it seemed to me that in the second game, the Guardian was moved from my path so that it could be passed).
The colors are assigned by drawing lots, and orange randomly names the number of the map on which the game will take place. There are no restarts.
Regarding the situation in the first game. It was the middle of the second week. The turn was long, and at the end of the turn, I attacked the Blood Wolves. It was a battle of medium difficulty, and a loss was quite possible, especially for a player who is not very good at battles.
At the very beginning of the battle, a disconnection occurred. While in the battle, I restored the connection, informed the judge in the chat, and brought the battle to the end. Immediately after that, I took a screenshot of the losses and saved the game, and immediately sent the screenshot to Stiky. During this time, it was practically impossible to switch, replay the battle, and fake a screenshot. The judge refused to look at the screenshot. I was not allowed to upload the save file. In fact, after such a display of distrust, I had no choice but to agree to a replay. This was after 4 hours of play, when the game was already coming to an end. Later that night, I analyzed the situation. Yes, I believe that my victory was very likely, and the judge's decision was in favor of my opponent. Arguing with judges is not my style, but in this case, I believe the decision was unfair.
The Chinese side is satisfied with the result. A replay of the first game is impossible; I have already seen the save file.
No offer was made to play a game to 2 wins from the Chinese side. I could continue the match to 2 wins from a score of 0-1 after November 15, if I have internet access. But if the Chinese team believes that they acted correctly, then there is nothing to talk about.
Thank you very much for your messages. I am very pleased that some players on the Chinese side also doubt the correctness of the decision regarding my first game and have the courage to admit it. Respect. And I am very sorry that axelle is experiencing problems on his forum because of this.
Let me explain the rules. In advance, 10 maps for 3 players are generated. Red is the judge and is forcibly placed in a part of the map where he does not interfere or change the layout. From there, he can monitor all the players' actions. In my opinion, the layouts are quite balanced, and the bugs have been removed (for example, it seemed to me that in the second game, the Guardian was moved from my path so that it could be passed).
The colors are assigned by drawing lots, and orange randomly names the number of the map on which the game will take place. There are no restarts.
Regarding the situation in the first game. It was the middle of the second week. The turn was long, and at the end of the turn, I attacked the Blood Wolves. It was a battle of medium difficulty, and a loss was quite possible, especially for a player who is not very good at battles.
At the very beginning of the battle, a disconnection occurred. While in the battle, I restored the connection, informed the judge in the chat, and brought the battle to the end. Immediately after that, I took a screenshot of the losses and saved the game, and immediately sent the screenshot to Stiky. During this time, it was practically impossible to switch, replay the battle, and fake a screenshot. The judge refused to look at the screenshot. I was not allowed to upload the save file. In fact, after such a display of distrust, I had no choice but to agree to a replay. This was after 4 hours of play, when the game was already coming to an end. Later that night, I analyzed the situation. Yes, I believe that my victory was very likely, and the judge's decision was in favor of my opponent. Arguing with judges is not my style, but in this case, I believe the decision was unfair.
The Chinese side is satisfied with the result. A replay of the first game is impossible; I have already seen the save file.
No offer was made to play a game to 2 wins from the Chinese side. I could continue the match to 2 wins from a score of 0-1 after November 15, if I have internet access. But if the Chinese team believes that they acted correctly, then there is nothing to talk about.
