Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
I hope there will be a character who suffers from a suicidal mania. I don't remember what they're called.
And there was another idea (generally for some kind of mafia) to create a pair that isn't urban, but rather maniacal. Not making them super-powerful, like 75% defense, not leaving any clues, and burning everything, but something simpler. And they would go around in pairs, killing people, and we could come up with some interesting features. Maybe even make it a choice: one kills, and the other checks the status/role of the killed person. One kills, and the other protects the first (acts as a lookout). One kills, and the other erases the evidence.
I calculated Slonysh's moves; I made it easier to select roles for players by removing the viscount; I killed Hostor before he killed the angel in the epilogue (Vissy described it in a heated and incorrect way); I was a beacon of hope for the city; I proved that you should trust me when I'm the town role, and not someone else; I drew the Whispering's block; I didn't make a single mistake during the game.
I identified Slonish; I made it easier to select roles among the players by eliminating the Viscount; I killed Hostor before he killed the angel in the epilogue (Vissi described it in a heart-wrenching and incorrect way); I was a beacon of hope for the town; I proved that you need to trust me when I'm the town, and not someone else; I drew the Whisperer's block; I didn't make a single mistake during the game.
You identified. Are you talking about randomly choosing Slonik as a target and accidentally hitting? x) And you were lucky that her defense was described directly? x)
Ah, so killing a town member is now considered a plus for the town, making role selection easier? :D I'll keep that in mind, lol.
Yes, a significant achievement. :/ A beacon of hope. :/ Yes, you shone brightly.
Well, yes, after the first night, I will always trust you, the town member.
You drew the block. A nice excuse for the fact that you couldn't do anything in the second half.
Not a single mistake. //_\ Okay, there's nothing more to say about that.
You know what the difference is? :/ I played badly - I admit it. I made mistakes - I admit it. And you pretend that you played perfectly and that even killing a town member was an absolutely correct action. Nice trolling, bro. The "making role selection easier" part was hilarious. We were short one vote twice. Twice. In addition, the Mafia could have mistaken Hermit for another role, and he could have taken the hit.
Gj, gg, and all that, you ZATASHEEL!
Even if we fight, even if there’s such thing I will not give up Just like this, I won't let go Strongly grasping your right hand’s warmth I’ll be here
Gil, I said that you earned Slonysh’s favor by pulling her out of the loop with your teeth, like a loyal companion and guard dog, so she won’t take revenge on you.
You started justifying yourself for some reason, after I told you to “first achieve something”; I didn’t argue with you once, I made a list of my actions, and looked at where it would lead; you filled it with emojis and new justifications and sarcasm.
And… what? What’s the point of all this? It seems to me that you didn’t grasp the essence of the conversation from the beginning.
And you were lucky that her defense was described directly?
I actually wrote about this today in the game thread. Everyone thought she was a dancer; no one knew how the defense of the mistress would be described artistically. I can’t say that GM messed up in terms of artistic merit, “revealed” something, and so on.
Added after 35 seconds
You were skipping your tenth mug of dark ale at the bar, trying to overcome the whispers.
No. They were whispering about someone else this time.
Gil, I said that you earned Slonysh’s favor by pulling her out of a loop with your teeth, like a loyal companion and guard dog, so she won’t hold a grudge against you. You started justifying yourself for some reason, after saying “first, you need to achieve something”; I didn’t argue with you once, I made a list of my actions, and looked at where it would lead; you filled it with emojis and new justifications and sarcasm. And... what? What’s the point of all this? It seems to me that you didn’t grasp the essence of the conversation from the beginning.
I already wrote about this today in the game thread, by the way. Everyone thought she was a dancer; no one knew how the defense of the mistress would be described artistically. I can’t say that the GM messed up in terms of artistic description, “revealed” something, and so on.
1. Gil4
Yes, I messed up, and I fixed it. I took responsibility, and I answered for my actions. And what have YOU achieved? :D
Where is the justification here? I was just stating facts. 2. Why all this? Because you are insulting people again. Did you think that it would be unpleasant for a person (anyone) to read this? To see that someone thinks they are capable of taking revenge on others in their own game? Out of spite for losing. Slonik, on the other hand, always behaved with dignity when she lost. Without insulting others. And without the tantrums in your style. So, I’m sorry, but it seems to me that you didn’t grasp the essence of the conversation. This is the only and main thing I wanted to convey: I didn’t like the assumption that Slonik would not conduct the game impartially. 3. Regarding the defense, I didn’t say anything about the essence of the artistic description. There are certain conditions under which a hint of the role is given. The activation of personal defense should not give such a hint. All interpretations of the literary description are assumptions, because there should not be a hint of the role in it from the beginning. Moreover, I agree that the nickname should not be revealed if the defense is personal. But this is just my opinion, so it’s pointless to argue about it.
Even if we fight, even if there’s such thing I will not give up Just like this, I won't let go Strongly grasping your right hand’s warmth I’ll be here
Wistrit
