Posts from Forum
7z (blue, Rampart, Kin, Kir) def c0nn3c71nkK.ppL (red, Conflux, Random, Luna) 2sm4d(3), 127
23.07.2011 7z (blue, Rampart, Kin, Kir) def c0nn3c71nkK.ppL (red, Conflux, Random, Luna) 2sm4d(3), 127
I confirm, it's a great game.
Yes, it's a great game! Here's a plus.
Look at the kind of people we're dealing with now... How is the organizer supposed to distinguish a newbie from a non-newbie? Should they play with everyone themselves? Or should they require everyone to indicate in their application "how many weeks they've been building their Capitol"? Nowadays, the game has such a comprehensive training system (tutorials, translations, chat, forums with a wealth of information) that anyone who wants to can quickly acquire above-average skills. So, I advise you to stop wasting time and focus on improving those skills.
no, you won't have to. BM gets you removed from the tournament, and from the forum as well, as far as I know. One more statement like that and it's BB...
Then you'll have to remove not just me alone! I didn't write about myself, but that's his nature!!!! And Dimasta, I crushed him in my very first online games, but he misled me into thinking I broke the rules, and I, out of ignorance, fell for it! And then when I talked to Deep Mike and happened to recall the game with this Dimasta, it turned out I was Playing By The Rules!!! But he just refused to keep playing, and I already had 19 Archangels against 6 or 7 Drakes! In short, I would have demolished him into flying scraps, but he's a coward and a blabbermouth, and he even writes to me about some kind of decency. (censored)
Added after 11 minutes
FidesXfX (blue, Conflux, Random, Westan) def Heroin(red, Barbarian, Des) 2sm4d(3), 136
Overall the spawn was mediocre, but lots of roads and on the first I successfully broke through to a Castle secondary, and due to a shortage of 2 ore I didn't build birds on the first, I cleared money buildings, took a swamp secondary, broke into the underground treasure zone. On turn 3 I got a lvl 2 Griffin Conservatory, after which the opponent was revealed, I got another lvl 3 Griffin Conservatory, and caught up to the fleeing opponent. Had no mana, but outmatched him in meat by about 5 times.
I can't say thanks for the game, because the opponent took most of his turns in 2 minutes or less, yelled at me for taking so long, and when I said I saw him after revealing the Observatory, I was called a cheater. And in general, according to the opponent, I just got lucky and despite everything he would break out of the group and f... me in the ...! A sad person.
People sure are interesting these days... How do you expect the organizer to distinguish a newbie from a non-newbie? Should he play against everyone himself? Or should the application обязательно require stating "on which week do you build the capitol"? Nowadays in Heroes there is such a training system (guides, streams, chat, forums with a full wealth of info) that any person can quickly gain above-average skill if they wish. Therefore, I advise not to waste time chatting, but to work on improving that very skill.
Is the essence of the problem still not clear, and are the bells tolling about the possibility of changing this unheard? "Picking on" the tag is NECESSARY! After all, search engines catch on to this. A tournament must simply live up to its name. Determine it by all possible and available means! Create a thread and put forward a proposal on how to distinguish newbies from non-newbies. The organizer should not just issue verdicts, but also communicate with absolutely everyone, just as you, for example, asked (are asking) about all the nuances of the state of gamers' abilities to host a game in your tournament. This is work, not just a name. Communication is the most important component.
It is much easier to automate recruitment than to select participants to your taste.
A newbie is someone who has not been playing Heroes for long, not a pro from another portal who recently registered on HeroesWorld! Strong players are usually known to everyone; for unknown nicknames, admission should be worked out separately. The difference between a noob and a newbie is huge! A noob is essentially a stopper in development, while a newbie can develop quickly if they know what they're doing.
So you ask how to tell the difference?
And how can you call a player who has been on HeroesWorld for a couple of years a newbie? It's beyond belief, simply absurd; what else is there to talk about?...
Is the essence of the problem still not clear, and are the alarm bells about the possibility of changing this not being heard? "Picking on" the tag is NECESSARY! After all, search engines latch onto it. A tournament must simply live up to its name. To define it by all possible and available means! Create a topic and put forward a proposal on how to differentiate between newcomers and non-newcomers. The organizer should not only hand down verdicts but also communicate with absolutely everyone, like you, for example, were/are interested in all the nuances about the state of gamers' ability to play in your tournament. This is work, not just a title. Communication skills are the most important component.
It's much easier to automate recruitment than to select players to your liking.
A newcomer is someone who has recently started playing Heroes, not a pro from another portal who recently registered on HeroesWorld! Strong players are usually known by all, while unknown nicknames require separate eligibility processing. The difference between a noob and a newcomer is huge! A noob is essentially a hindrance to development, while a newcomer can develop quickly if they know their stuff well.
Now you ask, how to tell them apart?
And how can you call a player who has been on HeroesWorld for a couple of years a newcomer? Beyond comprehension, simply absurd, what more is there to say?...
if you have questions, send them in a private message, I'll explain everything so that we don't have to return to this nonsense again

Then you'll have to delete not just me! I didn't write it myself, but that's his essence! And I beat Dimasta in my very first online games, and he misled me.
You know what they say: (censored). So you should have written that you were leading me on the whole game, and I fell for it. That would have been more truthful.
and how is one supposed to understand this???
This is when a person spends the entire game messing with your head, saying things like, "You're cheating," "Why are you taking so long?" "Are you giving up?" and other nonsense on every turn, distracting you. Meanwhile, you're trying to explain something to him, clarify the game mechanics, and so on, but he's always stuck in his own world. (By the way, I don't even mention that, in my opinion, he opened the map using an editor, or something else, because he was acting suspiciously, especially in the last moments, which I noticed; I didn't analyze it before). And at the end of the game, when there are no more words left, you kill him, and he writes a couple of "pleasant" lines to you and goes offline. Then it turns out that he did all this on purpose and even dares to write something on the forum. In my opinion, he should be banned from the tournament just for disrespecting the opponent he's playing against, especially since he himself confirmed on the forum that he was just messing with my head because he wanted to.
Users like Heroin should be banned because he is a troll. Otherwise, I will leave the forum myself. There is no place for trolls here.
Added 9 minutes later
These are not the words of a Sir, but of a 13-14 year old child. It feels like the guy has played too much Dota in Garena and has completely forgotten how normal, adequate people communicate. If he isn't banned, Heroin certainly deserves a final warning.
It's strange that Heroin still has the audacity to write something on the forum. I'll just say this: people here don't like to communicate with cheaters, so go troll somewhere else.
You should really keep quiet. You're an intriguer, you started this discussion, you were the first to use inappropriate language, and you didn't write anything about it ((((((((((?????? You're a provocateur, and how am I a cheater? You're probably crazy.
First of all, I didn't use inappropriate language, and secondly, you'll have to prove that to AK, because after analyzing the saves, it's clear that you cheated on the map, and it wasn't me who analyzed them, but competent people. The discussion is closed; if you have any questions, you can write to me on ICQ.

