Added 2 minutes later
That's a good point. And the Witch will back up Angel. I think it's a good option.

За всем следят машины благодати и любви.
New here? I'm Roha — want a quick tour?
That's a good point. And the Witch will back up Angel. I think it's a good option.

I don't understand why Amko?
His role can only be determined by checking his status by the sheriff. Let's assume the sheriff checked Amko and it turned out that he is a non-human. In this situation, this player could also be an abbot, a golem, or an angel.
Why are we executing him, and not a more obvious candidate for the mafia role - Slonysh?
Sincerely,
Gur
I think it would be more logical for them to block Morninga.
I don't understand why you are so drawn to adventures again... you can try to execute Amko, but not all sane townspeople will go for it. Just because Locke suggested it.
Gil, I think no one will listen to you this time either :Dmaybe except for 4 specific players
Gil, no, I also guess who it is, but I meant that Slonysh (or something like that) wrote in a similar way yesterday and with this word)
It's good that you revealed yourself, and now I don't have to worry about your Mafia role. :/
Are you really naively believing that you weren't listened to tonight?

Relax, I figured out the clue for Rimpah, and I'll figure it out for you too.
Are you saying you intentionally used an inversion? It's a universal excuse for a failed attempt, especially when the first words didn't really help.
and maybe it would be better to try to eliminate not the player, but the role? I don't know how, but I would rather get rid of the Sorceress.
You can use a counting rhyme.
I got Gur)))
You can execute me, Gil. You can...
But why Amka?
And why are we hanging Slonysh just because most peaceful players recognized her as peaceful? Am I missing something?
Sincerely,
Gur
Added after 57 seconds
Gil, are you suggesting that Slonysh is a golem?
Sincerely,
Gur
