The script goes straight to the trash...
Posts from Recently viewed movies.
For me, films with poorly developed scripts aren't films at all. I haven't seen the third part, only the first two, but I would briefly describe them like this: "AAA! These are huge robots! We're all going to die! Someone save us!" Well, perhaps you could also add: "Everyone, appreciate how a young guy and a sexy woman twice his age run away from the robots." These are remarkably terrible films.
Vayshan, it's boredom. Terrible, awful boredom, and accidentally stumbling upon these movies on TV.
That is... a movie.
P.S. I definitely wouldn't go to the cinema for something like that; I wouldn't want to pay for it.
Moderated: OFF-TOPIC in the message
I watched the movie Inglourious Basterds the other day, the latest film by a cult director of our time; his name doesn't even need to be mentioned, but just in case - Quentin Tarantino. I really liked the movie; it has an interesting plot and charismatic actors, especially the characters played by B. Pitt and C. Waltz. Some scenes are extremely tense, and the action sometimes develops so rapidly that you don't even have time to understand what's happening. I recommend it to a wide range of movie lovers. Not recommended for pedants.I was confused when reading Mr. Alexdoublesmile's post. The categorization by genre and the selection of horror films are appalling.
With a lot of stretching, you could try to fit it in. But overall - facepalm. Sorry, are you writing about this as a historical film?OMG! A fun adventure. Not Indiana Jones, not Star Wars. Right, they're probably from a different genre.
However, the next phrase put an end to it: "Watch normal movies, and then post lists."
P.S. You're talking to a corpse. I couldn't finish watching it; I fell asleep a third of the way through.
Regarding Indiana Jones and Sherlock, I just forgot, as did many others, probably, about other good films - because I was writing on the fly.
In fact, it's probably silly to think that there is an objective assessment of anything, because it depends exclusively on the criteria for evaluation, which in turn depends on the desired result. And it is individual for everyone. Films are no exception.
For example, for me, any comedy, although I like to watch them, doesn't leave a noticeable impression, as well as any horror film, which is why the low ratings. Don't take it to heart - there are as many opinions as there are people. I wouldn't want to impose my own. I'm just sharing my thoughts.
Moderated: OFF-TOPIC in the message
On the topic: I rewatched "Dragonheart," it's still a great movie. One of the best fantasy films, in my opinion. And the best film in terms of portraying dragons.
The second one is worse. It's full of bad jokes about dragon snot and burps.
Moderated: OFF-TOPIC in the message
Yesterday, I watched the movie "Shelter" with Julianne Moore and Richard Gere (wow, he also seems to be a Semite:D). At the beginning of the film, everything develops very interestingly, but then the script gradually veers into mysticism and religious themes... The film is cool, even if it's only worth watching once, but it's still interesting.
Moderated: OFF-TOPIC in message
I watched the movie "Battle: Los Angeles" yesterday; at the time I even wanted to go to the cinema, but my studies got in the way, which in principle was for the best, the movie is pretty mediocre. And the aliens somehow don't look like conquerors of interstellar space, getting beaten even by ordinary small arms. Well, at least they aren't from Earth, and even less so computer viruses, as in some movies of this genre.
OMG! A fun adventure. Not Indiana Jones, not Star Wars. Right, they're probably from a different genre.