Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
The Prince of Destruction has already said everything. Such a "specific case" happens very, very often. If you haven't encountered it much, then you haven't played the game enough.
If half of your units are defeated, should you retreat?
But ultimately, skill matters more than luck. Facing Chaos units as Haven on a good map at night is a risky tactic. Oops, I missed with four out of eight units. Never mind, the remaining four will definitely hit! Oops, they didn't. GG. One game out of a thousand. And the second game out of a thousand, and the tenth game out of a thousand. I've had moments where several mages can't kill a nearly dead unit, and it manages to tear one of them to pieces with 40% health. Warlock consists of randomness, and it's significantly more than half. In Heroes or Warcraft/Dota, skill truly matters; luck plays a smaller role. Warlock? Lol, it's all about probabilities. You could just as easily hold a tournament based on my dice-rolling.
Loki, I assure you, skill manifests itself not only in head-to-head battles. Nothing prevents sending assassins/shadows behind enemy lines and trying to eliminate the leader. Yes, you can lose due to bad luck. But this is rare. In the same Heroes game, for example, mages can find both gems and gold in the leprechaun's garden. Is it necessary to say that this significantly changes the game?
In an IT lesson? Well, what can I say here? If you think that randomness in Heroes plays a smaller role than placing a skeleton in a forest, then I can only advise you to play longer.
In the same Heroes, for example, mages can find both gems and gold in a leprechaun's garden. Is it necessary to say that this significantly changes the game?
No, it isn't. I doubt anyone seriously builds an entire strategy on whether gems will appear in the leprechaun's garden in the first week, and loses the game because they can't build a dwelling earlier. And your analogy is
Moderated: PROFANITY in the message
bad
. Many hardcore things, like clearing the map with a stack of sprites or two riders, and even the final battle between the main heroes, would be impossible to do if there was the same Korean-style miss system.
I doubt anyone seriously builds an entire strategy around whether they'll find gems in the leprechaun's garden in the first week, and then loses the game because they can't build a dwelling early.
Well, in Spring, strategies aren't built on "mistakes" either (not counting the terrain, but that's just one of the tactical points).
But in the case of quickly building Titans, the player gains a significant advantage in battles with the opponent (unless the opponent also gets lucky and develops quickly). Similarly, in Spring, by eliminating part of the enemy's troops due to their mistakes, the player gains an advantage in manpower.
In the same Heroes, for example, mages might get either gems or gold from the leprechaun's garden. Needless to say, this changes the game quite significantly?
On random at 160% - it doesn't change a damn thing :p You can easily gather all the needed resources on the first week anyway. That's why people play on 160%, there's much less luck involved. On 200% - it might make a difference, but only in rare cases with bad layouts (small respawn/strong guards). And for some poor fixed map where gems can only be obtained from the leprechaun, I'd think twice about whether to play at all, not just as mages. With equally skilled opponents in Heroes, it might come down to who got more cons/backpacks/hives/shipwrecks, but that's a different story :)
As for Vesnot - I haven't been playing long, still a complete noob, but I could hack and slash in the tournament as cannon fodder :)
You and Lock just don't have much experience playing yet.
I've been playing Vesnot since 2005, I'm no newbie. I still have version 0.85 lying around because it was great, despite the terrible graphics.
You can attack during the day, but what's the point? If I, with a 60% hit and dodge chance, miss at night, then by retreating, I'll be forced to fight during the day with a 60-40 chance, there will be a loss in both damage and dodge. What will the chances be? Besides, after my retreat, the enemy moves, and he's unlikely to attack me in a way that's convenient for me, right? Is randomness insignificant? There have been cases, and not just once, when a mage with 20 HP killed a full-gear gnomish berserker with a stick, of course, it's my skill and experience, yeah.
LightWarrior
Happy Life
