Characters Auto-translated

Okay.

No, last year I spent a lot of time on the Тя-Но-Ю map.

Rogue (the translation is, of course, terrible),

I've always wondered, what's the best way to translate "rogue"? This word is too versatile to simply choose "thief" or something else.

Well, translation is indeed a difficult task, but I would prefer the options "scammer" or "adventurer."

I've always been curious, what's the best way to translate "rogue"? This word is too versatile to simply choose "thief" or something else.

Rogue is fine.


SUDDENLY, despite the fact that

I'm a half-orc with a tail

and

I love dual-wielding swords

and

I play with a Russian player

, I consider Your Grace Omega the Great to be one of the most ADEQUATE fans of RPGs on this portal in particular and on the internet in general.

And in the second game, I had the same portrait, and I liked it because it reminded me of the doctor from "Clinic." True, she faded a bit towards the end. And I also went around with a Krei or Attone, and if I couldn't, I took Mandalore.

Rogue is fine.

I also think that it's the best of the options.
A scammer is someone who plays games for small stakes.
Adventurer doesn't carry the same connotation of illegality as the word rogue. or maybe I'm exaggerating a bit

I usually play as a Paladin.

Diablo 2

Throughout all the time I've played Diablo, Paladins probably made up two-thirds of my characters. The ones that have survived for the last year or two are:




There are also a level 37 Paladin with everything maxed out, a level 24 Paladin with Charge, a level 24 Paladin with Thorns (for some reason), a level 21 first Paladin with healing, and so on.
Although the coolest ones (among them, again, there was only one Paladin – the one I used to beat Hell) were from when I didn't even have internet access.

Rogue is alright.

On one hand, yes. On the other, Rogue is also a peaceful pickpocket, a lockpicker, and many other things. But let everyone decide for themselves. I personally got used to calling him "Rog" :)

I like dual-wielding.

This is especially true for agile swordsmen. Because a shield can't compete with them. More often than not, it's still sword + shield.

playing with a Russian version

Emmm... What does that mean? That you're playing KOTOR 2 with a Russian translation? There's an excuse - I played it a long time ago, and I wasn't very good at English back then. By the way, I only played KOTOR 1 after the second one, and I already put it in English. So you could say that these were pivotal games for me :)

Your Grace, Omega the Great.

Wow! I had already forgotten :rolleyes:

one of the most ADEQUATE fans of RPGs on this portal in particular and on the wider internet in general.

Thank you. That's really nice to hear.

True, he got a little pale towards the end. And I also used Kreia or Atton, and if I couldn't, I took Mandalore.

And I was very good. I also like Mandalore, I often went with him and Atton, but later, Mandalore was replaced by Visas. I don't remember what I had at the time of the screenshot with Kreia.

And in Diablo 2, almost all my Paladins were either shockers/freezers (with Zeal+Holy Shock/Holy Freeze skills), or smiters (Shield Smite), I occasionally leveled an avenger (Vengeance+Conviction), and many times a mix of everything in the times when there were no synergies.

Added 6 minutes later
P.S. Lock, let's just call you Omega, it's easier for me :smile43:

Is being reasonable a positive quality?
I've never understood people who think that way.

LOL, I remember how I beat one of my friend's paladins in a PvP match with my Barbarian. He kept saying how awesome paladins are, how they tear through all the mobs, and how zealots are so strong. The result: the paladin used all his full healing potions, while my Barbarian only used one super healing potion. That was hilarious.

P.S. And Necromancers are really tough – if you see one, run straight to the nearest portal.

A Rogue is also just a peaceful pickpocket.

I disagree. He is definitely an "evil thief."

By the way, I only played KOTOR 1 after the second one, and I already put it in English. So you can say that these were pivotal games for me.

And that's right. Just look at Ara and his gaming problems to understand that it's better to be a civilized person with knowledge of English, the first in the world, than an uneducated peasant looking for a Russian patch from xXxFaLLeN_VaSyA_666xXx.

Wow! I had already forgotten.

I specifically dug around in the Citadel!

And I was very good.

This was my main dilemma at the beginning of the game: leave her as a sweet girl, like in the series, with healthy circulation, or act according to my conscience. In the end, I chose the latter. I can say that I wasn't role-playing a "Bioware bad guy" who always chooses the bad, evil options and actions, but rather acted more or less ADEQUATELY. Maybe I made a couple of mistakes, but that's part of role-playing. In the first part, which I hate, I played through the entire game again on the dark side, simply because the choice there is terribly made; either you shake down money from a peasant, or you pay him out of the goodness of your heart, and at the end, you slap Bastila and immediately become three-quarters light (what a choice!), and I finished the game with penalties on dark spells.

Okay.

Added after 43 seconds

P.S. And the undead there are just terrible - as soon as you see them, immediately run to the nearest portal.

Without Enigma, almost no caster can survive.

Without Enigma, almost no caster is capable of performing well.

Yeah, and next you'll say that everyone who plays fairly has Enigma.

Honey, everyone in the ladder has an Enigma. And yes, Barbarian is trash; a Smiter will crush him, as will a Charger. And a Zealot is a PvE character; it's pointless to use him in PvP. If an Elementalist at least has a chance to do some damage, then a pure physical attacker will lose in one go.
Lock, "evil rogue" is an evil rogue, and considering the role-playing possibilities in games, it's not just him.

Added 6 minutes later

Is being adequate a positive quality?
I've never understood people who think that way.

Yes, Wolf, being adequate is a mega-positive quality. Because being inadequate is negative. Why? Because a healer running into melee combat, an assassin who tanks and attacks from the front, a tank who sends a mage ahead because he's afraid for his own safety, a mage who decides not to cast Fireballs from behind the tanks, but to fight with a sword – these are all inadequate. There are interesting ideas for developing different classes, and I like them myself, but don't confuse them with being inadequate. Inadequate people are evil.

Lord mentioned it, completely forgetting (or not even knowing) about the build variety in the second Diablo. By the way, in PvP, players don't use potions.
Hammerdin will kill everyone.

You can dodge the Hammer. But it's difficult. They'll kill everyone with just Charger and Smasher – the simplest one-button abilities. And yes, they don't use potions in PvP.
And Burner can boost the aura to levels 65-70, then it hits within a radius of almost 2.5 screens, dealing 2k fire damage per second.