Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Honey, everyone in the ladder has an Enigma. And yes, Barbarian is trash; a Smiter will crush him, as will a Charger. And a Zealot is a PvE character; it's pointless to use him in PvP. If an Elementalist at least has a chance to do some damage, then a pure physical attacker will lose in one go. Lock, "evil rogue" is an evil rogue, and considering the role-playing possibilities in games, it's not just him.
Added 6 minutes later Imaris, the Moon Wolf
Is being adequate a positive quality? I've never understood people who think that way.
Yes, Wolf, being adequate is a mega-positive quality. Because being inadequate is negative. Why? Because a healer running into melee combat, an assassin who tanks and attacks from the front, a tank who sends a mage ahead because he's afraid for his own safety, a mage who decides not to cast Fireballs from behind the tanks, but to fight with a sword – these are all inadequate. There are interesting ideas for developing different classes, and I like them myself, but don't confuse them with being inadequate. Inadequate people are evil.