Angels and paladins – how to use them? There are also discussions about them here. — Haven

Саня Изи

4/23/2011 8:24 PM UTC

Auto-translated

Lol, he only plays against the AI. I wouldn't take his words seriously at all.

Смысла нет, но вы держитесь там. Удачи, здоровья, хорошего настроения!
И пока в кармане пачка милкиуэйев - значит все не так уж плохо на сегодняшний день

Igor111

4/24/2011 6:08 AM UTC

Auto-translated

antonag07

I agree about the map.
Yes, Axel is the best hero for the Castle faction if he has room to develop. Dugald will be better on small maps where there won't be much development to higher levels.

The Outlands map is an ideal map for Axel (if one is at the bottom and the other at the top).

In reply to Ment

Dima Sarbash

4/24/2011 7:07 AM UTC

Auto-translated

Ment

:smile04: :smile04:

Please explain!

Ment

4/24/2011 7:10 AM UTC

Auto-translated

Try preparing some Griffons in a Knight’s Castle, Dima.

К А
Стикеры GBF в Telegram

In reply to Ment

Dima Sarbash

4/24/2011 7:17 AM UTC

Auto-translated

Ment

Try preparing some Griffins in the Knight's Castle, Dima.

Damn, I almost forgot! With these exams, I'll soon be turning peasants into dragons! I used to have a mod that allowed me to retrain ANY creature into a Haven soldier!

Added 4 minutes later
By the way, a 100% sure way to check who's stronger: choose heroes in a duel and set them to auto-battle. The computer will think for both of them!

Ganseng

4/24/2011 8:44 AM UTC

Auto-translated

By the way, here's a 100% way to check who's better: choose heroes in a duel and set them to auto-battle. The computer will think for both of them!

Something tells me that bot battles are not a good indicator, because they are not capable of logical thinking.

Ment

4/24/2011 9:39 AM UTC

Auto-translated

I agree. It would be better if one person played as both factions (but they should try to approach the battle objectively).

К А
Стикеры GBF в Telegram

In reply to Ment

Dima Sarbash

4/26/2011 1:13 PM UTC

Auto-translated

Ment

I agree. It's better if a person plays as both (but they need to try to approach this battle objectively).

Even so, a person will subconsciously favor the hero they like more, even if they claim the opposite. A computer is not capable of favoring one of the opponents. And as for thinking, there's nothing you can do about it.

Ment

4/26/2011 1:17 PM UTC

Auto-translated

It’s not easy to prevent this. When a player switches sides, they can easily start viewing the side they are no longer playing as the enemy. However, if players had to play for both sides simultaneously, that would be different.

Added 1 minute later
And the computer is slow, so the side with greater brute force will win, rather than the side with greater tactical potential.

К А
Стикеры GBF в Telegram

In reply to Ment

Dima Sarbash

4/26/2011 1:25 PM UTC

Auto-translated

Ment

It's not that simple. When a player switches sides, they can easily start viewing the side they are no longer playing as the enemy. However, if they had to play for both sides simultaneously, that would be a different story.

Added 1 minute later
But the computer is just brute-forcing its way through. This means that the side with greater raw power will win, rather than the side with greater tactical potential.

I understand that the computer simply overwhelms with its troops. But you didn't understand me. If a player likes a particular hero, they will unconsciously start favoring that hero. And it's impossible for them to dislike that hero in just 5 seconds.

Added 2 minutes later

dark_elf

Paladin and Archangel is a very useful combination, for example, like Fury and Rider in the Shadow League. The whole point is that Paladins attack everything, preferably from a distance, and Archangels resurrect. The "Divine Might" spell would be very useful, or whatever it's called.

You could also use Minotaur-Guardian and Rider; that would be 4 attacks in total.

Ment

4/26/2011 1:27 PM UTC

Auto-translated

I understand. There are some preferences, that's clear. But they shouldn't affect the level of gameplay. No matter which faction you play, even if it's the Hive, your primary goal should be to win. And changing your goal in 5 seconds is not difficult at all.

К А
Стикеры GBF в Telegram

In reply to Ment

Dima Sarbash

4/26/2011 1:32 PM UTC

Auto-translated

Ment

I understand. There are some preferences, that's clear. But they shouldn't affect the level of play. No matter who you play as, even as a dung beetle, your primary goal is to win. And changing your goal in 5 seconds is not difficult at all.

I agree that preferences don't affect the game, and winning is the most important thing. But I just haven't tried changing my goal in 5 minutes.

Happy Life

4/27/2011 9:19 AM UTC

Auto-translated

And I did it in five hours.

My sword, my trusted ally, unphased by my aspect.

Тёмный_Ильдар

6/1/2011 8:55 AM UTC

Auto-translated

I don't know much about this tactic, but here's what I do know: With Paladins, using "Righteous Strike," and with Inquisitors using "Stone Skin" and then attacking, I could take down 13 Black Dragons. (The hero had 17 attack and 34 defense.) With Archangels, we can resurrect the Paladin if needed.

Rokky

6/1/2011 5:20 PM UTC

Auto-translated

:) Well, that's like saying, "all units attack, bang, boom, hurray!" and victory =))
And how many of those horses did you have? =) It's better to take Knights of Isabel against them, as you need to destroy the enemy as quickly as possible before they overwhelm you with magic (and in general, when you have a decent number of horses (20 or more)) and the enemy isn't a die-hard Berserker fan, then only Knights are the best choice (by the way, if you already have Anti-Magic, then it's the same, only Knights).

Malder -> Fox Mulder
http://vkontakte.ru/id13369110