Auto-translated
Possible scheme: 2 groups of 4 players (3 rounds, must be played within the first 2 days), then 1(1)-2(2), 1(2)-2(1) – the winners play for 1st place, the losers for 3rd; 3(1)-4(2), 4(1)-3(2) – the winners play for 5th place, the losers for 7th. Cons: a strict schedule of rounds: if a game in one group takes too long, the remaining two will skip, and it's unclear for how long.
If there are 10 people, a Swiss system is definitely the way to go, with 4 or 5 rounds. The advantages of the Swiss system, especially in the 2nd round, are obvious: more opportunities to form pairs from available players. And if there are 12 people, it's even better – if there are no draws, the first round will be played, and in the second, there will be 3 pairs playing in each point group – there's plenty of room for drawing lots.
I understand that the maps will be chosen? That is, Slugfest can always be excluded...
We'll add North-South, and other suggestions are very welcome.
We also need to decide on a judge. If Dust isn't playing in Heroes 3, then he's the ideal candidate. If he is, we'll have to find someone else to be the judge. Options (considering that PReDS will be playing in two tournaments at once): GreatGenius (hasn't confirmed participation yet), Horn. If no one else agrees, I'll be the judge. I have experience with drawing lots for the Swiss system.
Next.
We will finalize the list of maps and post it no later than 2 weeks before the start of the tournament. During the game, you can look at (but only look at!!) the editor. The game version is Russian, but there will be a sheet in the club indicating the number of troops (a group of 10-19, many 20-49, etc.) – this is for those who are used to other versions. Expanded maps (expansion maps, new ones, etc.) will be used in the competition.
Next, a very difficult question, please treat it with understanding.
Maps not on the list can only be played on the last day of the competition. I'll explain why I'm writing these unpleasant words. Because if in the first round two experts say: "we'll quickly play Dominion, and we'll be the first to finish," and then they have only 1 game played while the other 3 have played – that's not good. However, for the last round, when players will only be delaying THEMSELVES, and OTHERS will not skip BECAUSE OF THIS – please, by mutual agreement, play any map.
Next. Questions like "what is this artifact," "what is the speed of upgraded trolls," "how many hellhounds do unupgraded vampires have," etc. These questions may arise from people who haven't played in a long time. We can address this issue in the following ways:
1. Questions are allowed. No one is responsible for the accuracy of the answers.
2. Questions are prohibited; we play as in a serious chess tournament: in silence.
3. The game information is displayed on computers (this option is not entirely correct in my opinion: 3 windows will be open at the same time: Heroes, the editor, and an office application. There may be unpleasant consequences).
4. Players can only ask questions to the judge. The judge answers questions related to the game information (if he remembers the answers). The judge does not answer questions that follow, such as "do you think I can defeat this guard."
These are my thoughts, write your opinions!