Posts from Mafia: general discussions. Auto-translated

I'm hoping for Vega... But yes, I'm preparing for the worst... It's always the same – when there are a bunch of idiotic problems, the Mafia is in full swing, but when everything calms down and the holidays are just around the corner, there's no Mafia... Instead of making it easier, so that sacrifices aren't necessary.

He said he wouldn't take on the Mafia for a couple of months...

And what's with all this nonsense you're spreading? It's not that bad, Arka's reveal. No one, except Lolodin, seemed to be upset when I deliberately revealed myself as the Main Servant in Mafia 26, so you would stop with your barbarians and your desire to hang me. And in general, I've hinted at my own role so many times in my posts, and a couple of times pretended to be someone else, that I should have been banned from playing a long time ago. It's just that in Mafia 27, the problem was that my reveal didn't affect the outcome...
Say what you want, but I think the GM should decide what rules he wants to create. And if he thinks that "reveals" like Arka's are a violation, he will create a corresponding rule. And if you read them incorrectly and violate them, then may the GM's punishment befall you, because that's your problem. But if the GM is lenient towards such tricks, then he thinks it's okay.

Added 1 minute ago
And by the way, I don't know about you, but "dry" rules don't stop me and don't take away the fun, because I read the main text, not how it's formatted. I don't care about the language – the main thing is that everything is clear. And the GM won't literally copy Gil's words, so why are you bothering him?

The main thing is that the rules shouldn't prevent players from lying and cheating.

Rely on Vega, but don't be careless yourself.

It's very interesting to see how you manage to please everyone in such a situation.

The point isn't to act like God and torment players in every way possible, but rather to control the flow of the game throughout each stage. And when such controversial situations arise (hopefully there won't be any more), like with Aro, take a clear and consistent position and stick to it until the end.

Simply taking a clear position and explaining it are two completely different things. The GM shouldn't just solve the problem, but do it in a way that the conflicting parties accept his decision as the only correct one. It should involve not only writing articles and counting votes, but also a structural analysis of each (even illusory) controversial moment of the game from all sides. Otherwise, it will end up being 54 pieces of soap...

P.S.: and the ninth game was incredibly intense in this regard.

Wouldn't it be better if someone explained to me – is it now fashionable to close the Mafia thread without waiting for the GM's log?:confused: I understand about his computer, but will there still be a log?

Closed to prevent spam. Once Nebo fixes his computer, the thread will be reopened.

I wish someone would explain to me – is it now fashionable to close the Mafia thread before waiting for the GM's log?

This has always been fashionable; the trend reaches its peak especially when the number of posts in a newly played Mafia game reaches a level that could break records for the number of posts for other game masters.

but will there still be a log?

Yes, there will be. ......

Open?...

Be sure to open it.

Open?...

I'll ask to open it myself.

Guys, could someone run a Mafia game, and then I'll prepare my setting? I'm just really busy right now, and it's also too similar in theme to the previous Mafia game, so it would be good to mix things up with something a little less crazy.

Explain to me how to play it, I just can't seem to grasp it: o :smile32:

Well... did you read the rules? Read them a couple more times. Then you'll understand the game itself.

Well... I've read the rules. I've read them a couple more times. I'm waiting for the game to start so I can figure it out.