Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
As strange as it may seem, some companies, corporations, societies, and publishers are only interested in the steady stream of money flowing into their pockets, and not at all in any kind of heroic community of hardcore gamers.
In the end, it will be the heroic communities of hardcore gamers that bring in the money for Ubisoft, and Ubisoft seems to be doing everything it can to make as few people as possible interested in the game. There is hardly any information about it, only pictures. If sales are poor, Ubisoft might say that "the Heroes series is not economically viable" and shut it down completely. I think only hardcore fans of the third game would be okay with that.
Армия баранов под предводительством льва сильнее армии львов под предводительством барана.
God save us everyone Will we burn inside the fires of a thousand suns...
It seems that Ubisoft is now doing everything to make as few people as possible interested in the game.
And what, should they just lay everything out so that all interest disappears? And there's no need to call everyone "hardcore gamers" here.
Edited: INSULT in message
Morning, this applies to you too; I don't see any sensible thoughts coming from you, just garbage.
Смысла нет, но вы держитесь там. Удачи, здоровья, хорошего настроения! И пока в кармане пачка милкиуэйев - значит все не так уж плохо на сегодняшний день
I think this option will only appeal to hardcore fans of the third game.
I doubt it will satisfy them. :) The community of the third game still feels betrayed by the fourth, they had too many expectations and were disappointed. A truly amazing game is needed to revive the once-powerful community. The fans of the fifth game live their own lives, and the fans of the third game live theirs. If the game is good, we'll all play in the same tournaments. :smile13:
In the end, it will be the dedicated Heroes communities that bring in the money for Ubisoft, while Ubisoft seems to be doing everything to make as few people as possible interested in the game.
Come on, most people will just download it from torrents, and at most, they'll buy it for the multiplayer if they like the innovations. And even then, it's unlikely, because Hamachi and Hotseat are always available, and Disciples 3, for example, turned into complete garbage. The less you talk about the upcoming game, the more you can rip people off.
Why should they reveal everything at once and ruin all the excitement? And there's no need to call everyone "hardcore gamers." Morning, this applies to you too; I don't see any sensible thoughts coming from you, just a bunch of nonsense.
Well, not everything, but feeding us only with pictures a month before release (and so far, nobody has postponed anything) is already an overkill. I suggest reading this thread; it contains a reasonable dialogue with the Community, and compare it with the current pathetic Q&A sessions. The word "hardcore gamer" was used by me personally for extra expressiveness without any negative connotation (especially on a Heroes resource). As for Morning, I don't know, but he seems different now.
Nagan-4
They won't be satisfied with that. :) The third game's community still feels cheated by the fourth one; they had too many expectations and were disappointed. A super game is needed to restore the once powerful community. Fifth game players live their own lives, and third game players live theirs. If the game is good, we will play in tournaments together. :smile13:
I think that fans of the third game are sometimes overly conservative; anything that isn't like the third game is met with hostility. Let's see how it goes this time.
Morning
Come on, most people will just download it from torrents, and at best, buy it for Multiplayer if all the innovations turn out to be appealing. And even then, probably not, because Hamachi and Hotseat are always available, and Disciples 3, for example, turned into complete garbage. The less you tell about the upcoming game, the more money you can make by deceiving people.
But someone will still buy it; the fifth part and all its expansions weren't protected at all. My drive couldn't read the disc with Lords of the Realm; I downloaded an image from the internet, entered my key, and voilà. But still, people bought the game, and in sufficient quantities. Security measures have advanced since Heroes 5; maybe Ubisoft will follow Blizzard's path and only offer online games through their service. In that case, whether you want to or not, you'll have to buy it if you plan to play online.
Армия баранов под предводительством льва сильнее армии львов под предводительством барана.
God save us everyone Will we burn inside the fires of a thousand suns...
Defensive capabilities have improved since the fifth installment of the game; perhaps Ubisoft will follow Blizzard's lead and make online play exclusively through their own service.
If Garena is this, then firstly, I'm really hearing about it for the first time, and secondly, judging by the description, it's a complete analogue of Hamachi or OpenVPN. By "Blizzard's way," I meant the absence of local network play in StarCraft 2, only through Battle.net. And if Ubisoft makes it only through ubi.com, then no Hamachi or anything else will help.
Армия баранов под предводительством льва сильнее армии львов под предводительством барана.
God save us everyone Will we burn inside the fires of a thousand suns...
You’ll have to buy it whether you want to or not if you plan to play online.
Oh, come on. I don’t think everyone would mind spending, say, 70 UAH (sorry, I don’t know the equivalent in your currency) on their favorite game.
They have three basic units: Sentinel, Archer, and Sister. The Sentinel fights in melee; the Archer is a ranged unit; the Sister provides support.
Captain Obvious. In Heroes 5, it was completely different. Archers shot, infantry stood their ground, and mages cast spells.
One of you noted that Rakshasa were widely considered the most beloved characters in Heroes among players.
Really? No sarcasm.
Of course, you can upgrade units, as well as hire unupgraded versions of them.
What about my favorite alt-units! Does anyone know where I can send them questions, and get answers from this video? I really want to ask about the likelihood of alt-units appearing in the future.
I don't see anything wrong with the lack of a local network for myself. As I said before, the main thing is to have fewer crashes and bugs in the game.
Really? No sarcasm.
Yes. The only worthy creatures in the Academy, in my opinion, of course.
What about my favorite alt-taps! Does anyone know where I can send them questions about what I was told in this video? I really want to ask about the likelihood of alt-taps appearing in the future.
It's unlikely they will answer you. In these interviews, they just spout nonsense, and there is zero real information.
Having an account with numbers; rooms that can accommodate two and a half hundred people at once; sections for different games; various perks like access to broadcasts, et cetera, et cetera. In general, it's a somewhat garish but quite developed client. People use Hamachi and similar programs because they don't know about Garena, or because they organize cozy matches with well-known friends and some beer.
Really? No sarcasm.
Kids love kittens; they're so cute, and they have two fancy swords. However, the statement about their popularity seems like a fabrication, in my humble opinion.
Kids love kittens; they're so cute, especially when they have two fancy swords. However, the claim that they are universally loved seems like a bit of a fabrication, in my humble opinion.
Personally, I didn't like them. Firstly, I don't see any idea, originality, or meaningful impact in them. Secondly, they "slightly" don't fit the concept of the Academy statues.