Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Posts from Mafia 26. Lady Mallowen's Last CapriceAuto-translated
Damn, where is the whole city? This is fun... First, about what I missed. I like Gil's version about Arandor. Lots of analysis, well-reasoned arguments - the drug addict is high and agitated. That's great. Second, Gil's current post. He's also doing well, lots of analysis. But I'm still wondering - why would the Mafia write two notes to me from the postman? One says about evil, the other about magic - were they trying to present me as an alternative smoker? Either the Mafia overdid it, or they planned to use it later. The note from the maid is also dismissed. But why so obviously? The Mafia, it seems, hasn't decided on the roles yet. Assuming that Hastings is alive, we can consider his clue. And I'll say right away that "Horned Monster" is associated with the devil - the apocalypse of Hermit. I suspected him yesterday, so I immediately thought of it. Earlier in the day, I figured out his clue "Monte Cristo" - "Monte Cristo" in Italian means "Mount of Christ," and the wiki for the query "apocalypse" refers to "The Revelation of John."
This book of Revelation describes the events that will take place before the Second Coming of Jesus Christ to earth.
I don't know - maybe the players have other candidates, but personally, I'm sure about Hermit being Mafia. And now he's throwing Arandor under the bus to avoid being implicated. For tonight, regarding the clues for Amka's murder, I have a couple of ideas: When I was browsing profiles and everything related to them, I remembered Vincent Cassel from Ling's avatar. He played the role of one of the Russian gangsters in the movie "Exporting Vice." The "Matryoshka" is one of the symbols of Russia that is famous in the West. There might be a connection here... But I haven't figured out how to link the postcard yet... These are my thoughts for now.
Gil, your accusations are based solely on the postman's note, and that's it. The rest is just fluff. You write phrases like the one where I supposedly failed to mention the Mafia block and some other nonsense, trying to connect it all to the postman's note. It's ridiculous, honestly. So, should we then suspect everyone who hasn't detailed all the NDs, etc.? Okay?)) Besides the note, which may not even be genuine, you have nothing.
No, you simply made a mistake, esteemed opponents. Did anyone notice that I forgot to mention the Mafia's third action in my lengthy post? I wrote so much that I overlooked such an important element. There were two logical options for the third action: 1. Removing protection from Flandre, who was attacked. 2. Redirecting the killer's target to an undesirable player. Protection was not removed – there were no phrases in the newspaper even remotely suggesting this. This leaves us with the second option. There are two possible scenarios here. They kept the Registrar blocked to redirect the killer to him, or they kept him blocked to prevent him from interfering with another kill, redirecting the killer to another undesirable player. Apparently, to me. So, Ar, you shouldn't say that you could have easily killed me – that's exactly what you wanted to do. Oh yes, sorry, it wasn't just you – it was your entire group. And the first scenario is ruled out – the Mafia wouldn't personally kill their own puppet. They made a mistake about who was the killer. It was a very nice mistake. And that was your downfall. You not only failed to do the most important thing for you at this stage (correctly identifying the killer for subsequent use in your plans), but you also accidentally killed the real killer. And yes, I'm not saying that I'm basing the above solely on the logic of "it's dangerous to immediately kill those who accuse" – as you can see, I believe that my death simply didn't happen.
Here, perhaps, one can agree with Arandor; this is speculation. However, the rest is quite convincing.
After the killings, there are a lot of clues available, but no one is trying to solve them. Very reasonable. The town is still being led like a flock of sheep, right?
And yet, despite the "abundance of clues," you yourself are not offering any alternative theories. You are only talking about the fallibility of someone else's version.
I'm still looking for clues. If I find any, I'll let you know.
Regarding the two letters: the first is written in the style of the previous one. The second has a slightly different style. I think they were trying to make it seem like one was a fake and the other was real.
Even if we fight, even if there’s such thing I will not give up Just like this, I won't let go Strongly grasping your right hand’s warmth I’ll be here
Hmm, I was describing the same possibility – using mana for one's own purposes. And what, did I make a mistake somewhere, and are you saying that you didn't have such an opportunity?
You wrote that the Mages accidentally killed Mana and you're saying that they could have used him as a weapon, but how, if they didn't know him? Just rely on luck? Hmm. Well, maybe someone would do such a stupid thing, I don't know))
Added 3 minutes later If you can't find the clues yourself, at least listen to others. I liked Reg's version about TaCo, although not all the clues were taken into account. But at least he's peaceful, and you can trust him.
No, rely on the evidence. There was a ton of it. The problem is that it was misinterpreted. You could consider it speculation, and, Ar, you're just like in those police procedural shows – you find one point (a possible falsification of the letter) and try to prove that everything is based on it. But if you were a city dweller, you wouldn't pretend that this is the ONLY piece of evidence I have.
Even if we fight, even if there’s such thing I will not give up Just like this, I won't let go Strongly grasping your right hand’s warmth I’ll be here
I don't know – maybe players have other candidates, but personally, I'm sure Hermit is playing the mafia game. He's even now letting Arandor, who's already been exposed, lose, so he doesn't get implicated.
Why aren't you voting against him if, in your opinion, he's already been exposed?
Всё не так плохо как Вы думаете. Всё намного хуже!
It’s much better to convict based on evidence than on a note from a postman. Yesterday, Gill said he was alive and could be trusted, but today the postman is already dead, and the Mafia are deliberately writing such notes, right? And not just one, but two! Maybe you’re in a pair with TaCo? The postman wrote that he would check her, and Reg had a theory about her, so you killed him, and now you’re trying to blame me based on a letter. Yeah, right?)
It's much better to execute based on evidence than based on a note from a postman. Yesterday, Gill said he was alive and could be trusted, but today the postman is dead, and the mafia is deliberately writing such notes, right? And not just one, but two! Maybe you're in a pair with TaKo? The postman wrote that he would check her, and Reg had a version about her, so you killed him, and now you're trying to blame me based on a letter. Yeah?)
I explained the reason why the Detective can be trusted. After all, you don't have the role of "predictor" who could know all of the Detective's NIs before the day begins. If I were in a pair with TaKo, she wouldn't have gone to sleep without leaving a vote for your execution yesterday. Don't try to justify everything by saying that I predicted a lack of votes, and we decided that she wouldn't vote. :D
Even if we fight, even if there’s such thing I will not give up Just like this, I won't let go Strongly grasping your right hand’s warmth I’ll be here
Gil, I can justify this by saying that the Mafia members never reveal themselves all at once or vote for the same candidate as a group. Besides, you can execute me today, so why rush it yesterday? That would have been suspicious and revealing.
I see you're getting nervous, Hermit... Why is that?
Xostor, I see that instead of doing the usual thorough analysis and looking for clues when you play as a town member, you're trying to cling to different roles and come up with ways to eliminate anyone. Help us execute Arandor instead. You know that even when everyone is 100% sure he's Mafia, they still won't execute him, and here it's not even certain that we'll get enough votes.
Всё не так плохо как Вы думаете. Всё намного хуже!
Nyashechka Kavai
