Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
No, you simply made a mistake, esteemed opponents. Did anyone notice that I forgot to mention the Mafia's third action in my lengthy post? I wrote so much that I overlooked such an important element. There were two logical options for the third action: 1. Removing protection from Flandre, who was attacked. 2. Redirecting the killer's target to an undesirable player. Protection was not removed – there were no phrases in the newspaper even remotely suggesting this. This leaves us with the second option. There are two possible scenarios here. They kept the Registrar blocked to redirect the killer to him, or they kept him blocked to prevent him from interfering with another kill, redirecting the killer to another undesirable player. Apparently, to me. So, Ar, you shouldn't say that you could have easily killed me – that's exactly what you wanted to do. Oh yes, sorry, it wasn't just you – it was your entire group. And the first scenario is ruled out – the Mafia wouldn't personally kill their own puppet. They made a mistake about who was the killer. It was a very nice mistake. And that was your downfall. You not only failed to do the most important thing for you at this stage (correctly identifying the killer for subsequent use in your plans), but you also accidentally killed the real killer. And yes, I'm not saying that I'm basing the above solely on the logic of "it's dangerous to immediately kill those who accuse" – as you can see, I believe that my death simply didn't happen.
Here, perhaps, one can agree with Arandor; this is speculation. However, the rest is quite convincing.
After the killings, there are a lot of clues available, but no one is trying to solve them. Very reasonable. The town is still being led like a flock of sheep, right?
And yet, despite the "abundance of clues," you yourself are not offering any alternative theories. You are only talking about the fallibility of someone else's version.