2. I'm a neutral observer – just here for the laughs. Thanks for the new game ;D
Except the ones we've made
New here? I'm Roha — want a quick tour?
2. I'm a neutral observer – just here for the laughs. Thanks for the new game ;D
1. Shifting the focus is good and even smart, but not in this situation. I was talking about the dissatisfied intelligentsia – because you exhibit the same kind of resentment. But comparing you to revolutionaries is completely false, because what you're spouting can barely be called an attempt at overthrowing anything.
Thank you for the new batch ;D
Colleagues, what do you think?


Alright, let's do it like in the USSR: the revolutionary-minded intelligentsia will overthrow the monarchy, and the pro-monarchist faction, dissatisfied with the new government, will go where you said. Essentially, you've just dug a hole for yourself and your comrades with your ignorance.
Bolsheviks are not intellectuals. They positioned themselves as the proletariat. In reality, they were just a bunch of commoners.
According to your logic, the Socialist-Revolutionaries are pro-monarchists because they all fled in different directions, lol.






It seems Hostor meant HUGE HOLY WARS with mountains of spam and schoolchildren banned for life. You are absolutely right, it's epic. For the schoolchildren themselves.
And yet, in 6th grade, you should have been taught that the emigrant intelligentsia was dissatisfied with the party. A mistake was made. I overestimated your level of development.
If you refuse my offer, the Family will quickly shut down your "business."


Monarchy is an obstacle to a country's scientific progress.
I am interested in science. But only if it involves real SCIENCE, and not just any nonsense. If that's the case, you can add me to the list.