Information for moderators. — Tournament Committee

In reply to Wicc

Statistics

Registered: 8/22/2009 11:49 AM UTC

Posts: 1,402

12/24/2010 7:25 PM UTC #554

Auto-translated

Wicc

And it's also clear that the further you go, the harder it is to get rid of bad habits. Like SoD. Or control at 4000+500. About which people complain to me that it's not enough, that I need to set more. Lol.

I completely agree with that. Apparently 4000+500 is no longer enough for a quality playthrough of a game, pfft! Friends, no one is going to waste their time while you painfully think about where to spend the last 200 moves of the scout hero: take a resource or go along the path? Resource? Or along the path? Hmm, or maybe stay in place?

P.S. There are also anonymous guys who strongly suggested playing 2v2 SoD with 8 minute timers, and that wasn't a joke. Achtung, right?

Не бійся коли ти один, бійся коли ти нуль.

484800548

In reply to Сатир

Statistics

Registered: 4/29/2007 10:30 AM UTC

Posts: 11,704

12/24/2010 8:57 PM UTC #555

Auto-translated

Satyr

P.S. There are also anonymous users who strongly suggested playing SOD 2v2 on 8-minute turns, and it wasn't a joke. Seriously, isn't that weird?

Why anonymous users? These people don't seem to be hiding from anyone. I don't understand what's so weird about playing SOD on 8-minute turns. How is 8 minutes longer than 6? Either way, the majority of the turn time is spent on BATTLES, where you can get stuck, think, calculate, etc., and given that the game will last about 2 weeks, the time saved will be about an hour... And if we take into account that we will play for fewer days on 8 minutes than on 6, that hour will simply disappear.
And the suggestion was made so that we could play the game normally. Apparently, we have different ideas about what is normal. Although, we should have played on two-minute turns, but with the mandatory condition of a maximum of 3 heroes. Why drag out the game by building chains of 8 heroes? And another mandatory condition: battles ONLY on quick mode, otherwise it takes too long.

In reply to Dirty_Player

Statistics

Registered: 8/22/2009 11:49 AM UTC

Posts: 1,402

12/25/2010 11:36 AM UTC #556

Auto-translated

Dirty_Player

Why the anonymity? These people don't seem to be hiding from anyone. I don't understand what's so outrageous about playing SOD on the 8-minute mark. How is 8 minutes longer than 6? Most of the turn time is still spent on battles, where you can get stuck, think, and calculate, etc. Given that the game will last about 2 weeks, the time saved will be about an hour... And if we consider that we will play for fewer days on the 8-minute mark than on the 6-minute mark, that hour simply disappears.
The suggestion was made to play the game normally. Apparently, we have different ideas about what "normal" means. Although, it would have been better to play on the 2-minute mark, but with a mandatory condition: a maximum of 3 heroes. Why stretch the game by building chains of 8 heroes? And another mandatory condition: battles ONLY on quick battles, otherwise it takes too long.

:D If 8 minutes 2v2 is "playing a game normally" for you, then it's not surprising that you wanted to ban it with the rules. It's a pity you abandoned that idea; it was a great joke.

Не бійся коли ти один, бійся коли ти нуль.

484800548

In reply to Psyche_7

Statistics

Registered: 6/7/2007 3:41 AM UTC

Posts: 1,523

12/25/2010 12:40 PM UTC #557

Auto-translated

Well, personally, I can never manage to play a game in 4 minutes; I apologize, but I'm just not that quick with the mouse (although I can handle 12 poker tables, pressing all the buttons and still thinking through and evaluating the opponents' status 25 times).
I also think limits like 5000+500 are too high.
In my opinion, the optimal limit is something like 3000+300 or 2000+400. On the one hand, it doesn't allow you to relax and properly encourages you to speed up your thinking, and on the other hand, it's still quite adequate, allowing you to think through the situation and avoid making big mistakes.

"Это нам идеально подходит!" [Новосибирск, 2013]
"Красавчик! Если только не читер.." [Киев, 2014]
"Это Вам не шутки - нажрался Dust в маршрутке" [Новокузнецк, 2015]
Сам ты фиш (с) :D

In reply to asm

Statistics

Registered: 8/31/2010 9:39 AM UTC

Posts: 1,932

12/25/2010 8:20 PM UTC #558

Auto-translated

what is sports? I won't say :) competitions turn into sporting events! Large-scale and universally accepted, they are recognized as permissible competitions in various fields of human activity. There will come a time when esports will be more than just one thing. (many games will be imbued with the spirit of competition, and not just Counter-Strike and Battlefield will be popular alongside war games...)

Playing commentators would be interesting and educational.

It's not sports that are beneficial, but physical exercise.

МУДРЫЙ - не обязательно старый, ОПЫТНЫЙ - не обязательно мудрый... обладатель и того и другого всегда должен помнить слова НАПОЛЕОНА БОНАПАРТА: Война состоит из непредусмотренных событий; В каждом большом деле всегда приходится какую-то часть оставить на долю :smile33: СЛУЧАЯ...

In reply to asm

Statistics

Registered: 8/7/2009 11:10 PM UTC

Posts: 240

12/25/2010 11:00 PM UTC #559

Auto-translated

Javdet

The next day, people are usually too lazy.
2 How many people would be willing and actually understand how to comment on a game, for example, like Alex?.....

Added 1 minute ago

The quality of the game will really suffer; there won't be time to think while chatting.

So, having the game go through someone else's and reasonably intelligent mind is very useful. On the well-known sc2tv, there are commentators who can't keep up with the minimap, and no one really complains.
Vik, I think, wouldn't mind, and he would probably do a good job.

In reply to Лось

Statistics

Registered: 3/18/2008 7:49 PM UTC

Posts: 3,172

12/25/2010 11:44 PM UTC #560

Auto-translated

Moose

So, having someone with a decent level of awareness commentate on the game is actually quite beneficial. On the well-known sc2tv, there are commentators who can't even keep up with the minimap, and no one really complains.
I think Vic wouldn't mind, and he could handle it just fine.

Moose, are you really ready to be crucified by Vic?

Даже если вас съели - у вас два выхода:smile19:

Зима 2011-12.

In reply to asm

Statistics

Registered: 11/25/2007 3:52 PM UTC

Posts: 1,499

12/26/2010 4:35 PM UTC #561

Auto-translated

P.S. I would really like to see a stream of the final match with Maretti, with good commentary.

For this, we need the help of these guys themselves to create a quality stream. Alex won't bother with it, and I don't know about Maretti. If someone else streams their match, the quality will be poor.

Statistics

Registered: 9/1/2010 7:56 PM UTC

Posts: 738

12/26/2010 8:20 PM UTC #562

Auto-translated

Mar (red, Castle, Valeska, Valeska) def Sevan_80 (blue, Rampart, Ivor, Ivor) 2DM4d(3) 145.
Week 1. Valya with 3 stacks, there is an external dwelling of shooters, 3 Griffin Conservatories scouted. By the end of the week, native secondary hero, and a 2nd external dwelling of shooters. In native town, horses in the Citadel, secondary hero with shooters.
Week 2. No money, running for Titiva (+10 Shooting), and to the secondary Inferno town. Picked up an external dwelling of Monks along the way.
Week 3. Upgrade horses in the Stable and pass through Griffin Conservatories +2+2+2 and into the treasure zone.
Behind a group of bears, Naga Bank for 3, Pandora's Box 15 stacks of Vampires. Behind a crowd of Wizards, Shield +6 (the vampires fell). A hundred Mages blundered, traded 2 Angels for a Pandora's Box – 8 stacks of Power Lich. Tree for 6 Wyverns (he killed them). Native Angels in the Castle, secondary hero's horses in the Citadel.
Week 4. Clear the treasure zone. +6 +6 +6 +6 Wyverns, take Dragon Utopia 2 – Wings, and junk.
Split into main. Bring growth from secondary hero. Valya stands on the approach before the ГО. On 145, flies over to the ГО, captures the enemy's Castle, gg.
Thanks for the game.