Connection ErrorBad RequestSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Come on. This isn't math, where everything has to be precise. It's a philosophical question. Some people are fine with upgrading Pit Fiends and Cows, but I'm not.
It's not about accuracy, but about the very essence of the concept of balance – it's defined not by a specific individual, but by the community. It's clear that there won't be a balance for each individual person simply because tastes and playstyles differ, so there will be favorite and disliked factions. However, with a certain group of players, one can judge whether there is balance or not. That is, a sign of balance can be the diversity of opinions regarding the strength of factions, and a sign of imbalance – a formed hierarchy of factions.
Specifically regarding Bulls – do you upgrade them often? I practically don't build them, except in desperation, if I don't have enough money for Hydras. Therefore, I don't see anything wrong with upgrading them quickly – it balances things out.
The Pit Fiends have already been discussed, and arguments from both sides have been made. Which, as follows from the 1st paragraph, is a sign of balance.
By the way, Samurai and Redmi are playing on this topic right now.
I saved the game at turn 131. I'll be able to finish playing today from 8 PM to midnight, Moscow time. Now, I just need an opponent. P.S. I've never seen such interest in the game from the fans!:smile12:
Pradromalo
Auto-translated
The article was written by Captain Obvious!!!! Only at the beginning of the discussion are there a couple of useful words, but then: just another source of pointless chatter.
_Skype_: flavaforheroes
Nagan-4
Auto-translated
Yeah, it's cool to level up Shakti with troglodytes... and you don't need any other troops.
Although experience is the only thing I can somewhat accept. The bank, taxes, etc., are even worse. Of course, I'm speaking from the perspective of a "Shades of Darkness" player.
Of course, I'm speaking from the perspective of a SoD player.
Eric, I'll reveal a terrible secret: I used to be a SoD player too.
Wlk777
Auto-translated
Despite my deep personal (and mutual) lack of respect for Wicc, I can't help but admit that playing with experienced players is much more interesting.
Всем удачи ! И Морали !
wariator
Auto-translated
I started playing it when it was first released, and as a result of many games of World of Xeen, we and our friends developed more or less acceptable rules for the game. Of course, it's best to play it at home on a local network when you have plenty of time, because it takes a long time and is quite difficult, especially when the monsters on the map gain an impossible amount of experience! But it's very interesting! That's why I welcome the experience in World of Xeen, although I understand that there will always be friction between players who have taken one side or another! But that's what makes it more interesting! As they say, the truth lies in the middle! Good luck to everyone in games with or without experience!
Каждое поражение-навоз успеха!Герои как жизнь: непредсказуемы как городская маршрутка ,капризны как наши женщины,увлекательны как рыбалка в период нереста ,коварны и отвратительны если мышкой движет слюнявый читер! всё в них есть и это.......
With experience, I started playing as soon as it appeared. As a result of many games in WoG, we and our friends developed more or less acceptable rules for the game. Of course, it's best to play it at home on a local network when you're not in a hurry, because it takes a very long time and is quite difficult, especially when the monsters on the map gain impossible levels! But it's very interesting! Therefore, I welcome experience in WoG, although I understand that there will always be friction between players who have taken one side or another! But that's what makes it more interesting! As they say, the truth is in the middle! Good luck to everyone in games with or without experience!
That's understandable. I just didn't understand how you met me in my first online game with WoG, with all my troops at level zero? On the third week... Well, that's not right ;)
Всем удачи ! И Морали !
wariator
Auto-translated
It’s very simple! You work for 2-3 weeks, then come for 3 days, and everything seems fine! You sit down to play, and then the calls, visits from guests, and so on begin. There’s absolutely no concentration!
Каждое поражение-навоз успеха!Герои как жизнь: непредсказуемы как городская маршрутка ,капризны как наши женщины,увлекательны как рыбалка в период нереста ,коварны и отвратительны если мышкой движет слюнявый читер! всё в них есть и это.......
An example of a balanced Warlord Tournament. Spend 9500 during the auction for Brogh and still win the match. So, where is this elusive Warlord Tournament imbalance???????????