Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
I'm just thinking out loud, which sometimes happens when you're with thoughtful people. But you wouldn't understand...
In that case, you're not very thoughtful people, because these pieces of evidence are obvious. There was no pirate. A maniac came and killed, leaving no clues. Why would Revan write that phrase?
KOSHA, spirits cannot be evidence. They are given based on the profile. Is there really no better evidence for a female role? Considering that there was a similar piece of evidence in the third game, and that I used spirits to reveal the female role in my Mafia game, and the player was a woman. I think the same thing is happening here.
Or did your boss tell you to pretend to argue a little, so no one would think you're from the same group?
How could you even think of blaming the innocent, you vile mafia member! I'm definitely innocent; I'm just resolving a misunderstanding that arose because of my excessive chatting! And stop covering for your cunning accomplice! I know you're both in the same gang!!! AAAAA, you're all mafia, all maniacs, I'm the only innocent, white, and fluffy one!!!
No, the mafia will definitely develop paranoia in me; I should have avoided signing up for it.
in that case, you are not very bright, because these NDs are obvious. there was no pirate there. a maniac came and killed, leaving no clues. why would Revan write that phrase?
Okay, okay, a maniac, a maniac! Just calm down. So, Gur, Neira, Hermit, and Medj are NOT maniacs. That's all that can be said.
I somewhat agree with Elinna regarding Vervolki. What was the point of her starting to write about the pirate? Also, this came after Elinna's suspicions about Neyra. Is this an attempt to defend someone, or an attempt to frame Neyra?
Here are my thoughts: (k.s. - keywords) Night 1 Order of actions: 1. Sorceress (block), -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Seductress. ND1, - to Madge (k.s. spirits) Barbarian, - to Naera (I associate a lot of people with the Barbarian) Captain of the Guard - Madge - a quite respectable person. – Madge was blocked from him, no action. 2. Sorceress (defense) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 3. Seductress. ND2 (not displayed in the newspaper) ------------------------------- 4. Avenger. ND1 (not displayed in the newspaper) -------------------------------- 5. Royal Guard - to Hermit (guarding the house) 6. Warrior (if defense was not required - not displayed in the newspaper) ---------- 7. Informant - to Guru 8. Werewolf ------------ 9. Avenger. ND2 10. Pirate ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11. Outcast ND1 – to Madge 12. Executioner ----------- 13. Warlock --------- 14. Stalker -------- 15. Nameless -------- 16. Assassin ---------- 17. Sorceress (healing), - to Aru ((keywords: shortly before, magical, beauty) Paladin, - to Aru (k.s.: light) Outcast ND2 (displayed in the newspaper only if healing from poison was required) ----
It seems like everything fits. In general, I would risk assigning someone from the Hermit/Naera pair, provided that the murders did not go into natural/artificial defenses, then they are the first candidates!
Ты страшился тысячи вещей... Но все это были лишь маски, лишь видимости. На самом деле страшило тебя только одно решиться сделать шаг в неизвестное, маленький шаг через все существующие предосторожности. И кто хоть один раз оказывал великое доверие, полагался на судьбу, тот обретал свободу.
Мы не свободные, вольно танцующие автобусы. Мы – привязанные троллейбусы и трамваи
I actually somewhat agree with Elinna regarding Vervolki. What was the point of her starting to write about the pirate? Besides, this came after Elinna's suspicions about Neyra. Is this an attempt to defend Neyra, or an attempt to frame her?
Added after 34 seconds
Why?
HOW could my reasoning about who might have killed Medzh possibly FRAME Neyra? Explain. On the contrary, I'm writing that Neyra was blocked, so she couldn't have killed anyone (although, she might have wanted to very much)).
Yes, and if you don't hang him, use the good old tricks from psychological warfare ;) In short, execute Hermit, let him sweat it out.
Ты страшился тысячи вещей... Но все это были лишь маски, лишь видимости. На самом деле страшило тебя только одно решиться сделать шаг в неизвестное, маленький шаг через все существующие предосторожности. И кто хоть один раз оказывал великое доверие, полагался на судьбу, тот обретал свободу.
Мы не свободные, вольно танцующие автобусы. Мы – привязанные троллейбусы и трамваи
Basically, you're both on the same side, and you're protecting her because she's actually part of the mafia, while he's an innocent bystander. You're protecting her so that we think she's on your team and we execute him.
the point is that you're supposedly in the same mafia and you're protecting it, but actually, you're the one who's in the mafia, and he's an innocent person, and you're just protecting him so that we think he's in the mafia with you and we execute him.
Basically, you're pretending to be on the same team and protecting them, but in reality, you're the one who's part of the mafia, and they're innocent. You're just protecting them so we think they're on your team and we execute them.