Regarding Might and Magic: Heroes. — Tournament History

No ratings yet — be the first to rate!

Multiple choice Public votes

This poll is closed.

Automatically remove Champion status after 6 months from the date it was awarded

13.3% 2 votes

Automatically remove Champion status after 1 year from the date it was awarded

13.3% 2 votes

Automatically remove Champion’s Mark after 1.6 months from the moment it was received

6.7% 1 vote

Do not remove the Champion of Champions buff

33.3% 5 votes

Implement a feature that allows for early removal of the Champion’s Mark by allowing players with the Champion’s Mark to fulfill specific conditions

53.3% 8 votes

Дубровин Павел

8/31/2010 3:56 PM UTC

Auto-translated

Request to the Vol community: Please consider the possibility, or the impossibility, of removing the Black Mark of a Cheater (BMC). Multiple options can be voted for. The option "Provide the possibility of early removal of the BMC upon fulfillment of certain conditions by a player with a BMC" implies that if a player with a BMC fulfills a certain condition (e.g., placing among the top players in a "live," recognized, and serious tournament), then players can vote on Vol to remove the BMC from them. I think the 5th option should be worded as follows: "Provide the possibility of removing the BMC only upon fulfillment of certain conditions by a player with a BMC." That is, the word "early" has been removed, and the word "only" has been added.

С истиной где-то рядом...

Лето 2010.

Wlk777

8/31/2010 4:08 PM UTC

Auto-translated

An important condition for lifting the ban should be a clear definition (this may already be understood, but it doesn't hurt to clarify) – any repeated violation by a player whose ban has been lifted will automatically result in a permanent ban.

Всем удачи ! И Морали !

In reply to Wlk777

Дубровин Павел

8/31/2010 4:10 PM UTC

Auto-translated

Wlk777

An important condition for lifting the ban should be a clear definition (this may already be understood, but it doesn't hurt to clarify) - any repeated violation by a player whose ban has been lifted automatically leads to a permanent ban.

Yeah, I agree, it should definitely be that way.

С истиной где-то рядом...

Лето 2010.

Deriel_Linch

8/31/2010 4:22 PM UTC

Auto-translated

Cheating in Heroes of Might and Magic is a vicious cycle. It's better to ban the account immediately.
However, we need to agree on what constitutes cheating.
For example, if someone plays unfairly (e.g., exploits a bug or performs a rush strategy), it might not warrant special attention. But if they're caught opening the map, then they did so at their own risk.

Something like that.

злой_романтик

8/31/2010 4:26 PM UTC

Auto-translated

I haven't heard that they give rewards for rushing past the guards or doing a red rush in Might & Magic: Heroes.

In reply to Deriel_Linch

Дубровин Павел

8/31/2010 4:27 PM UTC

Auto-translated

Deriel_Linch

Cheating in Might and Magic is already a serious offense. It’s better to ban the account immediately.
However, we need to discuss the criteria for issuing such a ban.
For example, if someone plays unfairly (e.g., bypasses a moved guard or performs a rare rush), I don’t think it warrants special attention. But if they are caught cheating by revealing the map, then, unfortunately, they did so at their own risk.

Something like that.

Of course, Julian, no one has given (or intends to give) a “Cheater of Might and Magic” award for failing to defeat a Guard or performing a rare rush.

С истиной где-то рядом...

Лето 2010.

Wlk777

8/31/2010 4:56 PM UTC

Auto-translated

Here's another point. Linking the removal of the Champion title to the completion of a specific period is fundamentally wrong, in my opinion (at least, not automatically). For players who were caught with 100% evidence (like Jed and Loser) and, frankly, treat everyone like idiots by categorically denying everything, the Champion title should not be removed until they admit their guilt and repent. Also, under this condition (admission and repentance), a vote can be held on whether to remove the Champion title from any of its holders, even after a short period. IMO.

Всем удачи ! И Морали !

In reply to Wlk777

Дубровин Павел

8/31/2010 5:01 PM UTC

Auto-translated

Wlk777

Here's another point. Linking the removal of the Champion title to completing a certain period is fundamentally wrong, in my opinion (at least, not automatically). Players who were caught with 100% proof (like Jed and Loser) and, frankly, treat everyone like idiots by categorically denying everything, should not have their Champion title removed until they admit their guilt and repent. Also, under this condition, a vote can be held on whether to remove the Champion title from any of its holders, even after a short period. IMO.

С истиной где-то рядом...

Лето 2010.

Wicc

8/31/2010 5:06 PM UTC

Auto-translated

Please clarify the regulations.

Currently, can anyone create polls on issues that fall within the purview of the Arbitration Committee?

I simply thought that only members of the Arbitration Committee could do this.

Or am I misunderstanding something?

In reply to Дубровин Павел

scorp

8/31/2010 5:08 PM UTC

Auto-translated

How many regular players, without clones (and so on), have Champion of Champions titles and want to earn/regain (or somehow else) the trust of the online players? - Those who need it will prove it with their actions, and then the community will play with them without fear, as I think. These actions could be very detailed reports/analyses of the game/some kind of help, etc., whatever they are capable of! P.S.: Whether or not to remove or keep the Champion of Champions title doesn't matter to me anymore; if it's been tarnished, I won't play with that person online even after 2 years. P.P.S.: If you want to philosophize, Pasha, create a thread like "My records/or unsolvable tasks" - that would be much more useful information (again, as I think, but I might be wrong).

In reply to scorp

Дубровин Павел

8/31/2010 5:46 PM UTC

Auto-translated

scorp

P.S.: If you want to philosophize, Pasha, create a topic like "My records/or unsolvable tasks" - the information will be much more useful there (again, that's just my opinion, but I might be wrong).

Misha, well, not philosophize... but to resolve... that's what I want.

С истиной где-то рядом...

Лето 2010.

Лось

8/31/2010 6:02 PM UTC

Auto-translated

Cheating is a stain on one's reputation that won't disappear in a month, a year, or any other time. I believe I have every right to refuse to play with a cheater, for example, if someone accepts them into a tournament after they've been banned. Therefore, the idea of removing the ban after a fixed period is absurd.

RiMpel2

8/31/2010 6:41 PM UTC

Auto-translated

In my opinion, it would be easier for a person to create a clone and play under that account than to try to restore their reputation, etc.

Hermit

8/31/2010 6:45 PM UTC

Auto-translated

I think it would be better not to do it automatically, but to decide by voting, and only players who were eligible to vote at the time of awarding the Hall of Fame should participate in the voting.

Всё не так плохо как Вы думаете. Всё намного хуже!

In reply to Hermit

scorp

8/31/2010 9:15 PM UTC

Auto-translated

Hermit

I think it's better not to do it automatically, but to decide by voting, and only players who could vote at the time of awarding the Hall of Fame should participate in it...

The only nuance is that you will have to play with these players not only those players who voted for the award, but also all other Heroes of Might and Magic players... so I think it's better for everyone to vote against removing someone, but only certain people should vote for awarding someone.