Posts from Foreign ideals are fleeting and do not deserve to exist.
Auto-translated
So, there's no need to think of them as simpletons. A stereotype is one thing, but real people are another. Right, Vissy? Have you interacted with enough of them to make such a categorical and youthful statement?
It seems we're talking about different people.
I've interacted with many, so I can fully indulge in youthful maximalism and say, "yes, they are rednecks and garbage."
It's one thing for a person to call themselves a "guy" and have views that don't contradict that, and another thing for brainless meat that lives by reflexes according to the scheme "girls-beer-vodka-guys are having fun))))))))))".
There's a difference, isn't there?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gzlcq9LmkxU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muwcywf72a0&feature=related
Except the ones we've made
I won't give you definitions; use your own.
I've talked to many people, so I can fully indulge in youthful maximalism and say, "yes, they are uncultured and garbage."
It's one thing for a person, for some reason, to call himself a "lad" and have views that don't contradict this, and another thing for brainless meat living by reflexes according to the scheme "girls-beer-vodka-lads are having fun))))))))))".
Well, that’s it, there’s no point in continuing the discussion with you. The Emperor’s forces, as always, have triumphed over the forces of House.
I believe that junk is irrelevant.
Junk accounts for 98% of the objects.
THE FORCES OF HAVEN DEFEATED EVERYONE.
Except the ones we've made
For the second time today, I don't see anything that would allow me to immediately "identify a flaw" and close the discussion.
I won't give you definitions, I don't have any, and I don't have any arguments. Use your own, and I can just say something, and it will be the truth, and you won't be able to argue with that.
That's exactly what I'm talking about, the junk is insignificant.
Junk is 98% of the objects.
I won't give you definitions, I don't have any, and I don't have any arguments either. Use your own, and I can just say something, and it will be the truth, and you won't be able to argue with that.
You don't seem to understand the meaning of what I'm saying.
So what? It's insignificant, so it can be ignored. What remains is the non-garbage, which is what we're talking about. Garbage can't even be called a "guy." It isn't one. We weren't talking about it.
Actually, Amko made a good point with the thesis, "the boor is always someone else."
Except the ones we've made
It seems you don't understand what I'm saying at all.
Vis, everyone wants to believe that they are "someone."
I don't have any, and I don't have any arguments either; use your own, and I can just say something, and it will be the truth, and you won't be able to argue with that.
As I said, everyone has their own understanding. It turns out that this is essentially a pointless argument if we are simply calling the same thing by different names.
Except the ones we've made
