Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Foreign ideals are fleeting and do not deserve to exist.
For the second time today, I don't see anything that would allow me to immediately "identify a flaw" and close the discussion.
Imaris, the Moon Wolf
I won't give you definitions, I don't have any, and I don't have any arguments. Use your own, and I can just say something, and it will be the truth, and you won't be able to argue with that.
That's exactly what I'm talking about, the junk is insignificant. Junk is 98% of the objects.
So what? Insignificant means it can be ignored. That leaves the non-junk, which is what we're talking about. You can't even call junk "junk." It isn't. We weren't talking about it.