Skip to content

Posts from Foreign ideals are fleeting and do not deserve to exist. Auto-translated

5.0 (1 rating)
User Avatar
#107
Auto-translated
Here, we already have completely different ideas about what constitutes a "redneck."
In reply to Happy Life
User Avatar
#108
Auto-translated
So, there's no need to think of them as simpletons. A stereotype is one thing, but real people are another. Right, Vissy? Have you interacted with enough of them to make such a categorical and youthful statement?
Locky, the concept of "redneck" is usually subjective for everyone.
It seems we're talking about different people.
I've interacted with many, so I can fully indulge in youthful maximalism and say, "yes, they are rednecks and garbage."
It's one thing for a person to call themselves a "guy" and have views that don't contradict that, and another thing for brainless meat that lives by reflexes according to the scheme "girls-beer-vodka-guys are having fun))))))))))".

There's a difference, isn't there?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gzlcq9LmkxU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muwcywf72a0&feature=related
Tomorrow holds no promises
Except the ones we've made
User Avatar
#109
Auto-translated
You've gotten completely out of hand. It doesn't really matter to the bioreactor, does it? :)
aka Sir Holmes aka David Jones.
In reply to Imaris
User Avatar
#110
Auto-translated
Imaris, the Moon Wolf
I won't give you definitions; use your own.
Well, that's it; it's pointless to continue discussing this with you. The Emperor's forces, as always, have triumphed over the forces of the Dungeon.
WisTrit
I've talked to many people, so I can fully indulge in youthful maximalism and say, "yes, they are uncultured and garbage."
It's one thing for a person, for some reason, to call himself a "lad" and have views that don't contradict this, and another thing for brainless meat living by reflexes according to the scheme "girls-beer-vodka-lads are having fun))))))))))".
I believe that trash is insignificant.
User Avatar
#111
Auto-translated
Well, that’s it, there’s no point in continuing the discussion with you. The Emperor’s forces, as always, have triumphed over the forces of House.
For the second time today, I don’t see anything that would allow me to immediately “declare a loss” and close the discussion.
In reply to Imaris
User Avatar
#112
Auto-translated
I believe that junk is irrelevant.
That's exactly what I'm saying, junk is irrelevant.
Junk accounts for 98% of the objects.
THE FORCES OF HAVEN DEFEATED EVERYONE.
Tomorrow holds no promises
Except the ones we've made
In reply to Imaris
User Avatar
#113
Auto-translated
Imaris, the Moon Wolf
For the second time today, I don't see anything that would allow me to immediately "identify a flaw" and close the discussion.
Imaris, the Moon Wolf
I won't give you definitions, I don't have any, and I don't have any arguments. Use your own, and I can just say something, and it will be the truth, and you won't be able to argue with that.

That's exactly what I'm talking about, the junk is insignificant.
Junk is 98% of the objects.
So what? Insignificant means it can be ignored. That leaves the non-junk, which is what we're talking about. You can't even call junk "junk." It isn't. We weren't talking about it.
User Avatar
#114
Auto-translated
I won't give you definitions, I don't have any, and I don't have any arguments either. Use your own, and I can just say something, and it will be the truth, and you won't be able to argue with that.
And now, here's a link to that post ;)
You don't seem to understand the meaning of what I'm saying.
In reply to Imaris
User Avatar
#115
Auto-translated
So what? It's insignificant, so it can be ignored. What remains is the non-garbage, which is what we're talking about. Garbage can't even be called a "guy." It isn't one. We weren't talking about it.
Then why does this garbage constantly shout about how "right" they are? And in general, if they are garbage, then what is a "guy"?

Actually, Amko made a good point with the thesis, "the boor is always someone else."
Tomorrow holds no promises
Except the ones we've made
User Avatar
#116
Auto-translated
It seems you don't understand what I'm saying at all.
Actually, you aren't saying anything. /post/383541/, although you could.

Vis, everyone wants to believe that they are "someone."
User Avatar
#117
Auto-translated
Don't write things like that.
I don't have any, and I don't have any arguments either; use your own, and I can just say something, and it will be the truth, and you won't be able to argue with that.

As I said, everyone has their own understanding. It turns out that this is essentially a pointless argument if we are simply calling the same thing by different names.
In reply to Imaris
User Avatar
#118
Auto-translated
And what does "пацан" mean?
Tomorrow holds no promises
Except the ones we've made
User Avatar
#119
Auto-translated
Just say what you personally mean by the terms "boor" and "normal person," since that's what's been brought up and is the main thread of the conversation. Otherwise, the discussion is pointless. Don't be stubborn.
User Avatar
#120
Auto-translated
I think I've already explained in detail what "быдло" is; you even asked me to do it. ;) So, what exactly is "быдло," "гопник," and, most importantly, "пацан" in your understanding?