Posts from Is an AK (assault rifle) necessary or not in principle? (poll)

I mean not the current team, but the Arbitration Committee as a structure for resolving controversial situations in general.

Of course, it's needed; there's no need for a poll here!

What are all these strange topics and questions? Whose thoughts are these, spoken aloud? I'm in shock! Are we going to lose a year of our resource's development because of someone? Are you guys tired, or what? I don't understand you at all!

It's definitely needed; it's strange that 3 people are already against it:eek:

Yes, definitely!
Otherwise, who will resolve controversial situations in matches?

A pointless poll. You don't need to be a psychic to predict its outcome. Close the thread.

it is needed, and very much so!!! what will you do without it, how will you resolve controversial situations if you cannot come to an agreement with your opponent (if it's a tournament game and the organizer's decision is biased...)? where will you go then???

AK is required.

It's definitely needed; it's strange that 3 people are already against it:eek:

That's normal. It's opposition, and it should definitely be there. :)
Hi, guys. Glad you didn't leave the forum for good ;)

Undoubtedly, the Arbitration Committee (AK) is needed!

Moreover, I myself have contacted the AK members several times with various questions. I would like to point out that I have never been ignored.

In my personal opinion, the current AK is working more than well.

I was even surprised to see such a poll...

Recent events have muddied the waters somewhat, but the vote has put everything in its place.
AK, we're with you! :smile02:

There can't even be any discussion, it's needed. I remember the moment when the AK was created on the forum. And the forum has only grown stronger since then.

The composition was very well chosen, the people are smart and, most importantly, they don't flaunt their egos. The AK doesn't get in the way, but when needed, it's there — otherwise we'll slide into lawlessness.

There can be no discussion about it, it is needed. I remember the moment when the AC was created on the forum. And the forum has only grown stronger since then.

The composition was chosen very successfully — smart people who, most importantly, do not flaunt their egos. The AC is not an eyesore, but when needed — it is there. Otherwise, we will descend into lawlessness.

Lawlessness is already marching boldly!!!:smile14:

The recent events have muddied the waters a bit, but the vote has clarified everything.
AK, we're with you! :smile02:

The waters weren't muddied. It's just that a player who won 5 games in 5 matches turned out to be a dangerous competitor, and he was removed :smile34:. And three members of AK decided to exclude Alex from FB, but acknowledge that he played fairly.
Respect to Mizrael and LeBron, who, despite participating in FB, didn't want Alex to be kicked out of the tournament.
Heroesportal (http://heroesportal.net/tavern/?enter) isn't developed enough, despite Neo's legal education: Neo didn't realize in time to remove Paladin :D, which allowed Paladin to commit a crime – win the PL.
In general, AK behaves like an ideal referee on a football field. They don't spoil the game with whistles, and it seems like there's no referee until a foul occurs. But when a player is brutally fouled in the penalty area and receives a red card for simulation instead of a penalty, many questions arise about the referee.
I've contacted many members of AK with questions, and they've always helped me, including Kostya (Dirty Player), and I'm grateful to them for that.
I voted for AK. Imagine a football match without referees! Who will make a decision in a controversial situation? Imagine that all the courts in the country are closed...
What I can't understand is this: why do three out of seven say to the defendant, "you committed murder, and according to the law, this is a crime, and you should be sentenced to prison, but we declare you innocent"?
IMHO: this is lawlessness. If there's a crime, there's prison; if there's no crime, there's freedom. If there's a crime, but freedom, I don't understand.