The recent events have muddied the waters a bit, but the vote has clarified everything.
AK, we're with you! :smile02:

The waters weren't muddied. It's just that a player who won 5 games in 5 matches turned out to be a dangerous competitor, and he was removed :smile34:. And three members of AK decided to exclude Alex from FB, but acknowledge that he played fairly.
Respect to Mizrael and LeBron, who, despite participating in FB, didn't want Alex to be kicked out of the tournament.
Heroesportal (http://heroesportal.net/tavern/?enter) isn't developed enough, despite Neo's legal education: Neo didn't realize in time to remove Paladin :D, which allowed Paladin to commit a crime – win the PL.
In general, AK behaves like an ideal referee on a football field. They don't spoil the game with whistles, and it seems like there's no referee until a foul occurs. But when a player is brutally fouled in the penalty area and receives a red card for simulation instead of a penalty, many questions arise about the referee.
I've contacted many members of AK with questions, and they've always helped me, including Kostya (Dirty Player), and I'm grateful to them for that.
I voted for AK. Imagine a football match without referees! Who will make a decision in a controversial situation? Imagine that all the courts in the country are closed...
What I can't understand is this: why do three out of seven say to the defendant, "you committed murder, and according to the law, this is a crime, and you should be sentenced to prison, but we declare you innocent"?
IMHO: this is lawlessness. If there's a crime, there's prison; if there's no crime, there's freedom. If there's a crime, but freedom, I don't understand.