Posts from Appeals Committee. Disputed situations in tournaments. Auto-translated

The first post in the thread contains the rules regarding unfair gameplay. Whether they are good or not is not what we will discuss now. We also cannot change them retroactively. Perhaps, in the future, we will change something. But for now, these are the rules, and they should be followed.
The situation was considered for a long time. The decision was made that unfair gameplay occurred. Therefore, according to our rules, a discussion was organized on an independent resource. Why not here? There is a repeated, unfortunate experience with such discussions. Please ask all questions and express opinions there, and not here.
Registering on the forum takes 30 seconds.

The discussion on the external resource seems to be rather sluggish... or rather, it's not happening at all. But this case is much more serious than the one with Vitalik. Because many people had a grudge against Vitalik, but here, the player has such authority that an improper handling of the situation could make many people doubt the competence of the AC. Therefore, I advise approaching the resolution of this issue very carefully. The AC is clearly not in a position of strength here. Although, judging by the tone of some of its representatives, they don't seem to realize it. Such underestimation could have a detrimental effect on many.

I didn't read it and didn't pay much attention to that portal... but if there are suspicions, there are three solutions:
1. Ban
2. Do nothing
3. Ban for the season.

P.S. Don't touch Vitalik, many people had a grudge against him. Many learned to play Heroes from him, and he boosted the Heroes portal online. And Vitalik wasn't banned from the Heroes portal, even though there was a topic about him... somehow, World managed to "correct the injustice."

P.S. Don't touch Vitalik, many people had a grudge against him. Many learned to play Heroes from him, and he boosted the Heroes portal online. And Vitalik wasn't banned from the Heroes portal – although there was a topic about him there. Somehow, World managed to "correct the injustice."

I'm not disputing his merits to the Heroes community, and he turned out to be a pleasant person in real life, but from the discussion of that game with Neo, it's quite clear that many players suspected him even before.

In this case, there is no such background, and, on the contrary, there is a lot of evidence to the contrary.

Sure, Yura, we will definitely post it.

Heroes of Might and Magic players, please share your comments and suggestions regarding the Appeals Committee elections. Regulations for the HeroesWorld Appeals Committee elections: 1. The Appeals Committee is elected for a term of 1 year. 2. The date of the Appeals Committee elections is May 1st (tentatively), 2010. 3. Every player has the right to participate in the voting for the Appeals Committee, provided that they: - Have played at least 5 games (confirmed by reports) on HeroesWorld in the season preceding the Appeals Committee elections, or - Have participated in 1-2 offline tournaments on Volde in the season preceding the Appeals Committee elections, or - Are a member of the Volde Interportal Team. 4. A player participating in the voting indicates 7 players they would like to see in the Appeals Committee in the corresponding thread created for voting. 5. A player participating in the voting is not allowed to vote for themselves. 6. Based on the election results, 7 players are selected for the Appeals Committee by a simple majority of votes. 7. A second round of elections is held in case of a tie in votes and no vacant positions in the Appeals Committee. For example, if the seventh and eighth players on the list receive the same number of votes, then only these players participate in the second round. In the second round, the player(s) who receive a simple majority of votes are selected for the Appeals Committee. 8. A player with an active ban is not allowed to participate in the voting.

Excellent AK, I don't see any reason to change anything... and change it to what?

Excellent AK, I don't see any reason to change anything...

+100000000

Excellent AK, I don't see any reason to change anything...

I agree.

nothing needs to be changed here!!!!

Dirty_Player
LeBron
Mizrael
Pit for LM
scorp
vbn
Dubrovin Pavel

In my opinion, the current regulations for the election of the Appeals Committee for HeroesWorld are completely balanced and adequate. We voted ourselves, we chose ourselves... Those who have facts testifying against the entire Appeals Committee or against a member of the Appeals Committee in particular should "speak now or not speak at all."

Excellent AK, I don't see any reason to change anything...

+1.
tra-ta-ta-ta (to reach 10 characters....)

Pit for LM
vbn
I don't trust anyone with AK anymore.)))
Providing guidance on the rules is the primary task of the AK, but no one will pay attention to just one vote!!!!

nothing needs to be changed here!!!!

Dirty_Player
LeBron
Mizrael
Pit for LM
scorp
vbn
Dubrovin Pavel

+100 to the power of 1000. P.S. AK, I suggest adding Kash to the current team; I hope no one will object... :)

The current lineup is doing a great job:smile20:.
+1, nothing needs to be changed!