Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Dirty_PlayerMy opinion: the public forum is open unnecessarily. Why are public arguments needed? Why can't you sort things out in private messages about who has what longer? :D
It's really better to show these things in private:D
"Это нам идеально подходит!" [Новосибирск, 2013] "Красавчик! Если только не читер.." [Киев, 2014] "Это Вам не шутки - нажрался Dust в маршрутке" [Новокузнецк, 2015] Сам ты фиш (с) :D
It seems more appropriate to demonstrate such things in private:D
I think it's better in the Forum because in a situation where someone is right and someone is wrong (even if the situation already looks like a so-called argument), the one who is wrong can admit their mistake under the influence of public opinion, which is impossible in private. And the one who can't stand arguments can simply not read posts where they are or the entire thread.
Всё не так плохо как Вы думаете. Всё намного хуже!
MMM... alright, I've closed this mess once, and I've scolded people more than once... In this case, I'll stay silent – if the topic is open, it means Cash, who opened it, should keep order here!
I'm speechless...
It's unpleasant to read myself, but what can you do. Arguments arise in other topics, where they are completely unnecessary. And deleting everything indiscriminately is also not always possible. For example, today. It started with Alex, saying that Pete was lucky to win against Stinger... Well, let's assume he was lucky (I didn't honestly check the saves), I would have bet on Stinger. And so what? Everyone gets lucky sometimes, and sometimes they don't. And Pete has proven his skill many times, if he was lucky, he deserved it. However, Alex has the right to his opinion, and Vlk does, and Sam does too... And where am I going to put all these opinions if not in the Tribune? Leaving all this mess in the tournament topic will pollute the entire forum. Deleting it – again, someone will say that it's an abuse of power, silencing people, and so on. If Pete deletes it, it will look even worse. That's the situation
Let's put the question this way: does Alex, or any other forum participant, have the right to silence others and insult them ("You are nobody and your name means nothing," "you should just shut up") within this or any other topic, even if he is a mega-great super player?
Let's put it this way: does Alex, or any other forum member, have the right to silence others and insult them ("You're nobody and your name means nothing," "you'd better shut up"), even if he's a mega-great super player?
A smart person learns, a fool teaches... Don't be like that!))) P.S. it depends on what you consider to be more intelligence!!! If we play, let's play to 2 wins. If you win, I'll apologize and admit that you're a deserving top player. If you lose, stop spamming and pretending to be something you're not!!! Tomorrow at 12 Moscow time, I'll be online, get ready)):smile14:
P.S. It depends on what you mean by "more intelligence!!!"
For those who didn't understand – this is about the Battle Dome, I really wrote something similar to him there. SEM_56
If we play, let's play to 2 wins. If you win, I'll apologize and admit that you are a deserving top player. If you lose, you'll stop spamming and stop pretending to be something you're not!!! Tomorrow at 12 Moscow time, I'll be online, get ready)):smile14:
Hmm, a strange way of putting it. Why should someone's victory in these 2-3 games lead to what you're suggesting? What kind of strange logic do you have with ATG – you can win, say whatever you want, if not, shut up? I don't understand... I can play with you... Although, for now, the score is 9-7 in my favor.
You wrote it once, so don't complain when Alex_R writes something similar to you. You were even going to leave, and now you're writing such things... Or did he start it first, as always? :D
My opinion: the forum is open for no reason. Why are public arguments needed? Why can't you figure out who has what in private messages? :D
I unbanned him - be tolerant!:D
Added 3 minutes ago Hermit
But I think it's better in the forum because in a situation where someone is right and someone is wrong (even if the situation already looks like a so-called argument), the one who is wrong can admit their mistake under the influence of public opinion, which is impossible in private. And the one who can't stand arguments can simply not read posts where they are or ignore the whole topic.
At least one example, please:smile52:. But it should definitely not be closed - the topic is very invigorating sometimes.;)
Added 39 minutes ago Kash
It started with Alex, saying that Pete was lucky to win against Stinger... Well, let's say he was lucky (I didn't honestly look at the saves), I would have bet on Stinger. And so what, everyone gets lucky sometimes, sometimes not. And Pete has proven his skill many times, if he was lucky, he deserved it...
That's right, let's stop making things up and get down to business - interpreting the authorities:D
For example, I didn't see any attacks on Pete in Alex's post, the post concerns the quality of the templates on which the tournament is planned. As far as I remember, Pete himself did not deny after the game that the draw was one-sided. And this was the most anticipated game of the Moscow tournament, people were distracted from their own tournament games to watch it, I will remind you of another quoteNagan-4
How I envy those who are watching this game! I'm sick, so I'll just read it and have fun. Please, saves, preferably of this game.
And, to put it mildly, the game did not live up to expectations, and not because of the participants.
Pete himself, by the way, in the game with Eddie, was also not in the most comfortable position, facing 4 cans against the opponent on Panic.
play more skirmishes, analyze, and balance; they come up with even crazier things. If you encounter a good player with a strong starting position, then no matter how good the opponent's starting position is, the chances of winning are 0.0(0) on such maps. Let me explain: on a small map, you can't compensate for the opponent's advantage, especially considering the limitations on transport spells.
Play more skirmishes, panic mode, and balanced games; they come up with even crazier things. If you encounter a good player with a strong starting position, then in the case of the first player winning, no matter how strong the opponent's starting position is, the chances are 0.0(0) on such maps. Let me explain: on a small map, you can't compensate for the opponent's advantage, especially considering the limitation of transport spells.
I'm not arguing; I agree. I try not to play skirmishes, but sometimes I have to, because it's popular. I avoid panic mode and balanced games altogether. I was just saying that it's not necessary to resort to personal attacks.
As an organizer, I can tell you to go away... far away.
I think Captain made an unsuccessful joke here. It seems he meant that he could send Mizrael to the finals.