Connection ErrorBad RequestSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Based on this example, you can draw conclusions about the real ratio of your skills and Alex's. ... Stinger will still be Stinger, Alex will be Alex, and you will be a rather average player.
I'm sorry, but with a "small amount of food consumption" and "not outstanding" parameters, it's not that easy to take 5 champions to their maximum level. A small amount of food consumption means that 90 flies will be eaten at most in the 2nd round if the only magic used is healing, regardless of the player's skill. I think there was a significant amount of food consumption, which also contributed to killing the flies, and the stats/skills were decent. Don't start telling stories again.
You can't behave adequately and respectfully again; life doesn't seem to be teaching you, including on this site! I played against Dima. The starting point was 2500. On the first turn, I was in a Fortress. Accordingly, on turn 123, for 9 gold, I took the maximum tree with 4 champions, 32 Pikemen, 8 Swordsmen, Alkin, 2-6, advanced offense, expert armor, without a book! I barely managed to escape, but I took it. It's a pity I didn't have time to buy a book; I took a risk, hoping not to max out the tree! With healing, I would have lost at most 1 unit, I think...
one of the possible solutions: give Sergey some plus points, and based on additional criteria (whether it's the number of wins or a coefficient), he won't be eliminated from the group:) :smile15:
The post was indeed closed because it was no longer needed, and for my convenience, since #4 was updating too often, #2 and #3 were interfering and cluttering the page :)
Regarding giving him plus points... That's exactly what would happen – everyone would have 2 points, and he would technically have a win against the leaders – so either he would have to be eliminated, which is absurd, or we would have to find a way to not eliminate him... To avoid confusion and unnecessary explanations, I gave him 0 points. It seemed like Sergey initially accepted it adequately, but for some reason, after a month and a half, complaints started...
Now that the posts are open, take a look at Dutin's situation – it's even more unfortunate: he didn't play against two obviously weak opponents and didn't advance, even though he should have. I talked to the guy, and he had no complaints; he agreed that it was fair. And for those who can't handle losing – well, let them play against bots, what else can I say)
I won't write about this here anymore. Sorry if I offended anyone unintentionally; sometimes I write when I'm emotional. Let the topic remain; it would have happened anyway, but in other topics. It's better here.
Alex, you're a beast; you must really hate bees to climb into such a large Hive :)
You can't behave adequately and respectfully again – it seems life isn't teaching you, including on this site!
Sir, I apologize once more, but you're rambling. What does my adequacy and respectfulness have to do with my words about how a "small swarm" will die from damage in the second round with "not-so-great stats"? Point out where I'm wrong, or choose your words carefully, okay? In general, resorting to personal attacks is bad manners; you need to discuss the topic, but you apparently haven't learned how to behave on forums and are instead accusing others of who-knows-what. Furthermore, a "small swarm" of 8 swordsmen and 32 creatures, for your information, has more HP than the main stack of 4 or 5 knights, and I think it has taken down quite a few enemies as well. Therefore, in the future, try to be more precise in your expressions to avoid misunderstandings.
No-no, you're exaggerating again. :) I encountered Alex on the "Heroes" scene before Sem. I even demanded punitive measures against him on the League, there was such a case;)
He still hasn't found himself :( It reminded me of the comedy "The Longest Yard" with Adam Sandler, where a cellmate of his character was indignant that, according to a 5-star aggression scale for prisoners, the guards rated him at half a star. :)
Sir, I apologize again, but you are talking nonsense. What does my adequacy and correctness have to do with my words that a "small detachment" will die from the power in the second round with "not outstanding stats"? Point out the inaccuracy, or choose your words carefully, okay? In general, switching to personal attacks is bad manners; you need to communicate on the topic, but you apparently haven't learned how to behave on forums, and instead accuse others of who knows what. Furthermore, a "small detachment" of 8 swordsmen and 32 creatures, for your information, has more HP than the main stack of 4 or 5 knights, and I think it also took down quite a few enemies. Therefore, in the future, try to be more precise in your expressions so that there are no misunderstandings.
It's a pity that you still don't understand, after playing so much, that the creatures almost die in the 1st round, and the swordsmen don't deal any damage, therefore this detachment is extremely small!... it lasted for 2 rounds, and that's why the battle was won easily, since there were only 4 knights!...
It's a pity that you still don't understand, even after playing so much, that the "pokemon" creatures almost die in the first round, and the swordsmen don't deal any damage, therefore this advantage is extremely small!... It lasted for a little over 2 rounds, which is why the battle was won easily, since there were only 4 horses!...
Hehe, I perfectly understand that the "pokemon" creatures die quickly; I've already written about it, it's a pity that you don't read it =). And as for the swordsmen, I think they do some damage (I think they kill 10-15 flies and take back damage 2 times). Because 4 horses, under the given conditions, cannot defeat 90 flies, regardless of the player's skill.
Why do people think that if they say "16 grand units" or "4 cavalry," it means that there are no other troops left at all...? :confused: Where does this information come from??? :confused:
Someone wrote well that troops are divided into 3 categories:
1. Main force
2. Support troops
3. Single units
Of course, it's ridiculous to consider 30 spearmen as a main force, and they can't be called single units either... So, they are just regular support troops. But it's also important to understand that they EXIST! For example, if cavalry is built in a Fortress on the first week, then on the second week, there MUST be swordsmen (most likely 8) and spearmen (around 50)!!
Why do people think that if they say "16 grand units" or "4 cavalry," it means that there are no other troops left at all...? :confused: Where does this information come from??? :confused:
Someone wrote well that troops are divided into 3 categories: 1. Strike force 2. Meat shield 3. Single units
Of course, it's ridiculous to consider 30 pikemen as a strike force, and they can't be called single units either... So, they are just a regular meat shield. But you also need to understand that they EXIST! If cavalry is built in a Fortress on the first week, then on the second week there MUST be swordsmen (most likely 8) and pikemen (around 50)!!
Swordsmen and "Pokemon" will not necessarily be present. The most common and widespread reason is the lack of money. Or they lost somewhere. This is also not uncommon =). This dispute arose because of the expression "small meat shield" - so, I don't consider "small" to be anything that exceeds the HP of the main strike force =).
Swordsmen and Pokémon will be OPTIONAL. The most common reason is the lack of funds. Or they messed up somewhere. That's also not uncommon =). The argument arose because of the phrase "small advantage" - I don't consider something that exceeds the HP of the main attacking stack to be "small."
The argument here arose because of the phrase "a small boost" - I don't consider "small" to be anything that exceeds the HP of the main attacking stack.
Well, let's say, "dwarves" are definitely a boost. Although, in terms of hits, they significantly outperform the elven attacking stack.
By the way, we just finished a game on "Crusade Mode" with Samurai, and already in the first week, I went to the Treasury and destroyed everything I encountered there. :)
By the way, we just finished a game on Small map with Samurai, and already in the first week, I went to the Treasury and broke everything I found there.
Well, let's just say that wood-based units are definitely a good choice for dealing damage. Although, in terms of hit points, they significantly outperform the elven ranged units.
It depends on the situation; elves won't be very helpful in the Hive.