Psyche_7
Auto-translated
I can understand not awarding tech wins if both players are at fault, for example, if they couldn't agree on something. But this is different. It is explicitly stated that a player does not receive 1 point for voluntarily surrendering a match. No one should care how the match was played – whether someone surrenders on the first turn, or the second, or they decide not to generate a map at all, but just enter a report in the header, or something else... It's the same as if Kasparov had to not lose the last game in a match, and because he's afraid of losing, he says, "I surrender," and the judge records both zeros, which is what Kasparov wants.
This is how three friends can prevent two world champions from advancing from the group under any circumstances.
Please answer the question.
There's a lot of irrelevant stuff... Kasparovs, Karpovs...
Do you remember the question?
