HeroesWorld
  • Log in
  • Create account
  • Mode
    Interface scale

Posts from The required quorum for making changes to the Online Games Rules.

Tournament History Closed Topic
No ratings yet — be the first to rate!
Closed
Minimum quorum required for making changes to the Online Games Rules.
46 voters
Single choice Public votes
This poll is closed.
A simple majority of those who participated in the vote
37% 17 votes
2/3 of those who participated in the vote
26.1% 12 votes
3/4 of the votes from those who participated in the vote
37% 17 votes
User Avatar
Offline Дубровин Павел
Registered:
Posts: 1,805
#1
Auto-translated
I would like to hear the opinions of Heroes of Might and Magic players regarding the required number of votes needed to make changes to the World Rules.

1. Simple majority of those participating in the vote.
2. 2/3 of the votes.
3. 3/4 of the votes.
4. With experience: at least 1 game played per year before the vote.
5. With experience: at least 5 games played per year before the vote.
6. With experience: at least 10 games played per year before the vote.
7. With experience: at least 15 games played per year before the vote.
8. Experience is irrelevant.

For example:

1 and 4.
С истиной где-то рядом...





Лето 2010.
2
⚖️
0
User Avatar
Offline Psyche_7
Registered:
Posts: 569
#2
Auto-translated
Option 3 and Option 7.
0
⚖️
0
User Avatar
Offline Soroka
Registered:
Posts: 174
#3
Auto-translated
Psyche_7
The 3rd and 7th options
I agree completely.
Drink up, then I'll refill your glass...

Ты будешь жрать мир, или мир будет жрать тебя — в любом случае все о'кей, все идет по плану.
0
⚖️
0
In reply to Psyche_7
User Avatar
Offline Psyche_7
Registered:
Posts: 569
#4
Auto-translated
Psyche_7
Options 3 and 6.

When I voted, option 6 had at least 15 games. And now it has 10... What's going on?

Maybe it would be better if everyone suggested a minimum number of games?
0
⚖️
0
In reply to Psyche_7
User Avatar
Offline Дубровин Павел
Registered:
Posts: 1,805
#5
Auto-translated
Psyche_7
When I voted, the 6th option had at least 15 games. And now it's 10... What's going on?


I just looked at the table and realized that with such requests, the votes of many will not be counted.
Sorry if something is wrong...

My choice:
Options 3 and 8.
С истиной где-то рядом...





Лето 2010.
1
⚖️
0
In reply to Дубровин Павел
User Avatar
Offline Psyche_7
Registered:
Posts: 569
#6
Auto-translated
Dubrovin Pavel
Yes, I just looked at the table and realized that with such requests, the votes of many will not be counted.
Sorry if something is wrong...

15 games is about 3-4 months of registration. That's fine.
In short, I'm in favor of a minimum of 15 games.
0
⚖️
0
In reply to Psyche_7
User Avatar
Offline Дубровин Павел
Registered:
Posts: 1,805
#7
Auto-translated
Psyche_7
15 games is roughly 3-4 months of registration. That's reasonable.
So, I'm in favor of a minimum of 15 games.

Since you think it's necessary, alright, I'll bring this point back.
We have democracy here, you see... :smile02:
С истиной где-то рядом...





Лето 2010.
2
⚖️
0
User Avatar
Offline SpiriTT
Registered:
Posts: 840
#8
Auto-translated
2 and 5 are quite enough to prove yourself and start relying on the rules.
ну это вообще всем аргамездец!© Kash
без авто:smile20:
Человек - игрушка Бога. Этому - то и надо следовать. Надо жить играя.
Платон.
1
⚖️
0
User Avatar
Offline bRitvo4kA
Registered:
Posts: 1,107
#9
Auto-translated
2 and 6 answer options

2/3 is already a constitutional majority. I think that's enough.
В дикім полі
0
⚖️
0
User Avatar
Offline Wlk777
Registered:
Posts: 2,544
#10
Auto-translated
And 2/3 or 3/4 of what? If it's based on the number of voters, then I'm against it, but if it's based on the total number of active players (we need to consider this), then I'm for it. I think 10 games is a reasonable threshold.
Всем удачи ! И Морали !
0
⚖️
1
User Avatar
Offline Javdet
Registered:
Posts: 3,093
#11
Auto-translated
2 vbn: (or any other moderator)
There are a lot of topics and polls on the forum right now regarding changes to the rules, and it's overwhelming. Even if changes are introduced, there's a high probability of missing them. Please create another topic that will contain these changes, and only the CHANGES should be in it, with all other posts being deleted!
Даже если вас съели - у вас два выхода:smile19:

Зима 2011-12.
2
⚖️
0
In reply to Wlk777
User Avatar
Offline PReDS
Registered:
Posts: 1,494
#12
Auto-translated
Wlk777
And 2/3 or 3/4 of what? If it's based on the number of voters, then I'm against it, but if it's based on the total number of active players (we need to think about this), then I'm for it. 10 games seem like a reasonable threshold.
You're being harsh, sir. Where else would such a high threshold be set? Only in African democracies, where the president is in power for life and gets at least 90% of the vote each time. If a person doesn't vote, they might not be for it, but they definitely aren't against it. So, it should be based on the number of voters, but there needs to be a minimum number for the election to be considered valid. :D
1
⚖️
0
In reply to PReDS
User Avatar
Offline Alessandro
Registered:
Posts: 465
#13
Auto-translated
PReDS
We need a minimum number of votes for the changes to be considered valid. :D
I completely agree.
I'm for 2/3 and a minimum of 10 votes in favor of the change. Experience doesn't matter, although I think I've played 15 games myself.
Discord  5884
0
⚖️
0
In reply to PReDS
User Avatar
Offline Wlk777
Registered:
Posts: 2,544
#14
Auto-translated
PReDS
You're being harsh, my friend. Where else would they set such a high bar? Perhaps only in African democracies, where the president is in power for life and consistently gets at least 90% of the vote. If someone doesn't vote, they might not be for it, but they definitely aren't against it. So, it should be based only on those who voted, but there needs to be a minimum threshold for the election to be considered valid. :D
I think changes to the rules are a serious matter, as people will have to play by them. It's a shame the thread with Loy's post about the example of banning Inferno was deleted. So, I'll say this myself: some people might simply not notice the thread with the poll, some might be away, and as a result, we might get a rule change that is supported by only 20-30% of active players? I'm against this; the idea that if a person doesn't vote, they're not against it – I don't agree with that. IMHO.
Всем удачи ! И Морали !
1
⚖️
1
In reply to Psyche_7
User Avatar
Offline Captain
Registered:
Posts: 1,231
#15
Auto-translated
3rd and 7th options
Дипломатия - искусство говорить собаке "хорошая собачка" до тех пор пока не найдешь подходящую палку.
0
⚖️
0