Connection ErrorBad RequestSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
The required quorum for making changes to the Online Games Rules.
And 2/3 or 3/4 of what? If it's based on the number of voters, then I'm against it, but if it's based on the total number of active players (we need to think about this), then I'm for it. 10 games seem like a reasonable threshold.
You're being harsh, sir. Where else would such a high threshold be set? Only in African democracies, where the president is in power for life and gets at least 90% of the vote each time. If a person doesn't vote, they might not be for it, but they definitely aren't against it. So, it should be based on the number of voters, but there needs to be a minimum number for the election to be considered valid. :D
PReDS
