Posts from Would you like to play as a Necromancer with the ability to upgrade Vampires?

In total, the Necropolis faction will have 20% Necromancy instead of 30%,

meaning there will be fewer restrictions.

I've been playing with these heroes for about 10 years. For the first 7 years, I would occasionally play hot-seat games on one computer WITHOUT RULES and LIMITATIONS, using overpowered vampires, phoenixes, psychics, necromancers, and Solmyr, etc. Then I stopped for a while. And I've been playing online for a little over a year. So, I have enough experience.

That's right, you can break a lot of "Hive" structures with their help, which will greatly simplify your task, and then you can visit the human player.

I'm all for not making radical decisions in the heat of the moment. We need to test everything thoroughly, perhaps organize a fun tournament, for example, where one player always plays as a Necromancer against any other faction, and vice versa. We need to try it out, get a feel for it, and then make a decision. It's not necessary to make changes on the fly. IMHO.

We need to thoroughly test everything, maybe organize a fun mini-tournament, for example, one player is forced to play Necropolis against any Castle,

We've developed some unhealthy practice on HeroesWorld. Come up with some crap and immediately a tournament. Why spawn pointless tournaments? :confused:

We've developed some kind of unhealthy habit on Hv. I come up with some nonsense, and a tournament is immediately organized. Why create pointless tournaments? :confused:

The poll also has an interesting title. :D Many people would like to play like that. But if you conducted a poll: "Would you like to play AGAINST a Necropolis with the ability to upgrade Vampires," it would be interesting to see what the results would be.

2SEM_56 +1

We've developed some unhealthy practices on Hv. Someone comes up with another crazy idea, and a tournament is immediately organized. Why create pointless tournaments? :confused:

In my opinion, Konstantin, you are wrong. People are trying to come up with some new things to add variety; you can't just keep doing the same thing over and over, and you're putting them down like that... Even if some ideas aren't the most ideal, they still deserve a chance.

Tournaments with any idea have the right to exist. But each Tournament should have its own time. Right now, there are a lot of Tournaments going on, and suddenly – a new one! And so what? Did people rush to join it? No way! Only 8 people signed up, and that's it. But with good organization, you can gather 20. And scheduling Tournaments on top of each other disrupts deadlines because participants can't be in two places at once.
Why did we create an organizational committee? So that we don't just open Tournaments with a "first come, first served" approach?

based on the same, far from ideal rules, because some people don't want to change anything.

Nothing is better than in the USSR - "eat what you're given," i.e., 1-2 tournaments at the same time, please choose. Or here's another one: "-What will you have: tea or coffee? -Coffee. -But there is no coffee!":D

and they will take into account their capabilities in terms of free time for games.