Would you like to play as a Necromancer with the ability to upgrade Vampires?

What does "meaningless Tournaments" even mean?:confused: If a Tournament exists, people sign up for it, and they enjoy playing, then it's not meaningless, and certainly not "rubbish":mad:. Let's all "PLAY" together: that is, spend the rest of our days mindlessly playing the same game with the same far-from-ideal rules, because some people don't want to change anything.

Added 3 minutes later

Tournaments with any idea have the right to exist. But each Tournament should have its own time. Right now, there are a lot of Tournaments going on, and suddenly – a new one! And so what? Did people rush to join it? No way! Only 8 people signed up, and that's it. But with good organization, you can gather 20. And scheduling Tournaments on top of each other disrupts deadlines because participants can't be in two places at once.
Why did we create an organizational committee? So that we don't just open Tournaments with a "first come, first served" approach?

There's nothing better than in the USSR – "eat what you're given," i.e., 1-2 Tournaments at a time; please choose. Or here's another example: "-What will you have: tea or coffee? -Coffee. -But there's no coffee!":D