Stubbornness is just a stupid principle. You still don't understand me ((
Being principled doesn't mean having all possible principles in the world...
New here? I'm Roha — want a quick tour?
Stubbornness is just a stupid principle. You still don't understand me ((
yes, you should wash more often, otherwise you will definitely turn into a troll
What is the meaning of honor, conscience, nobility, and self-sacrifice?
(seriously)
Stubbornness is when a person doesn't acknowledge any opinion other than their own, while principles are actions based on moral and spiritual upbringing that you consider to be right...
It's immoral and wrong to take an average, worthless citizen. By the way, would you share the secret of where you get them? And how do you determine it – by the sign on their chest that says "Average, worthless citizen"? (Of course, we are definitely not average, not statistical, and not worthless!). And please, do something about the concept of "redneck" – is its use immoral, or are there exceptions? Well, as in the case of the average... (well, you know what comes next).
... The smell of a troll was clearly felt in the air...
1) Regarding the prospects of being alone, as is well known, humans are social creatures, so it might be fun for a while to blow up buildings and drive around in a Lamborghini, but after a year of such a life, it will all get boring, and a severe depression will set in, which, after a few more years of such a life, will likely lead to suicide. In my opinion, this is not an option.
2) Conscience, nobility, and self-sacrifice are not needed by anyone except the person who possesses these qualities. Someone might calmly walk past a person who has gotten into a difficult situation, for example, fallen and broken a leg. And someone else, on the contrary, will experience unpleasant feelings if they do not help this person; this feeling can be called conscience. The meaning of conscience, nobility, and so on lies in moral satisfaction, and nothing more. Some people have these moral principles more developed, and some less.
A great excuse to portray one's own stubbornness as a noble and principled stance.
Cash, from your last post, it follows that you dislike the second option because it would cause you moral anguish and because you don't want to feel like you're back in school?
Are such inconveniences enough to say goodbye to life?
"Why would I want to be tormented by anything?" – this thought has the scent of all broken, unsuccessful, suicidal people, don't you think?
If you take the average, worthless citizen...
I'm not interested in blowing everything up and driving around in cool cars.
Therefore, I will be at least bored if everyone dies and I remain.
No.
I don't think so. It's a perfectly reasonable thought, common to both sane people and idiots.
Indeed, where do you get them from? )) Don't fantasize about the average person – that's your invention, not mine.
Left alone, this worthless citizen will only eat, sleep, and so on, i.e., exist.
Worthless? That's your example. From your words, it follows that a person who chose the second option is worthless because they could have saved everyone, but didn't. That's why I gave an example of an average worthless person and described their activities. So:)
A world where you are alone is not a world.