Posts from The Communist Party of Heroes World. Auto-translated

Communism has never existed anywhere.

What exactly is communism? O_O Give me some! *_*

Communism has never existed anywhere.

Once I take the throne, things will change... :)

Communal structure is a way out of a difficult economic situation.

You don't understand anything! The people wanted freedom and trusted the revolution, but what did they get instead? Now they are only remembering the victims of the repressions...
Long live Kolchak! Let's make Omsk the capital of the world!:D

You don't understand anything! The people wanted freedom and trusted the revolution, but what did they get instead? Now they are only remembering the victims of the repressions...
Long live Kolchak! Let's make Omsk the capital of the world!:D

The White Army was financed by Western powers who wanted a government in Russia that would be controlled by their decisions... That's why the USSR refused to recognize it for so long...

yes, sometimes it happens that both sides are bad, and there are no good ones
still, in the USSR, many people were killed, including intelligent and educated people, not just some kind of riffraff.

Yes, sometimes it happens when both sides are bad, and there are no good ones. Even so, many people were killed in the USSR, intelligent and educated people, not just some riffraff.

In general, if we consider political motives, each side believes itself to be pure and righteous, and everyone else is "evil." Only in alliances are these nuances overlooked, and allies are attributed the position of "supporters of light."
After World War I, the United States became a superpower, even though it entered the war last, when the countries of the Entente were clearly winning. The political system of the United States corresponded to the views of the leading European powers. The "Western world" became dependent on the United States...
The Russian Empire, due to internal revolution, could not last even a year, and there were huge human losses. And for this blunder (the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk), the country lost part of its Eastern European territories, and Finland and Poland gained independence. The Bolshevik communists who came to power spread a socialist system, which was undesirable for bankers, counts, and businessmen – the highest economic elite of the Western powers, which is why the USSR was simply refused recognition. If the system had been pro-Western, Russia might have continued to participate in further politics...
In 1933, the National Socialists came to power in Germany, a political system that was something between Western and Eastern political systems... Despite the fact that Germany ceased to comply with all the conditions of the peace settlement, it rapidly increased its military power and annexed the territories of Austria and part of Czechoslovakia, which had previously been declared independent. The West made these huge "concessions" because they believed that Hitler's propaganda and his hatred of Slavs and, in particular, Russians would eventually lead to a war against the USSR, which they disliked... Poland, which was a buffer zone but received military support from France and England, was not protected; this was simply ignored because Hitler's "direction" was correct – towards the USSR. And the USSR was immediately declared the main enemy after the invasion of Finland, and preparations were already underway for a landing in Norway to conduct an operation against the USSR. Then Hitler preferred to attack the main enemies of Germany in World War I – France and England... But what would have happened if Germany had continued its expansion to the East? England and France would have joined the Reich... The USSR did not interfere because it had also suffered from the Treaty of Versailles after World War I... Western propaganda posters proclaimed the bloody alliance of world evil in the form of Nazi Germany and Stalinist USSR, despite the USSR's neutrality...
And then Hitler made a fatal mistake, not squeezing everything out of Western Europe, and attacked the USSR. As a result, Socialists and Capitalists united, the long-suffering Russian people, and the allies sympathized with each other, and the "army of Light" defeated evil. At the same time, as long as Japan, a member of the Axis (Germany, Japan, Italy, etc.), did not attack the United States, they generally did not care that the infrastructure of Europe was collapsing and millions were dying...
Two years after the victory (they called it a rest), the Cold War began because the United States and England could not accept that communists and socialists had become so influential in world politics... The West quickly formed NATO, the USSR learned about this, inquired, and offered its membership – but was refused, saying that they did not need such a policy... In the West, the USSR transformed from the long-suffering Russian people into a mighty "evil empire"...
In general, in the end, money and influence rule the ball – that is, an even greater opportunity to get even more money... Western politics is obvious in this regard; I don't know about the USSR. One thing is clear: the West does not want to be content with a smaller piece if it always has the largest piece on the menu.

I’ve seen it all. Give me freedom!

I've seen it all. Give me freedom!

But aren't you free now? You're free to do whatever you want... it's just that it doesn't lead you to anything good in most cases... That's democracy for you.

Oh, come on... You're all making a fuss... Politicians... *threatened with a banhammer*

The White Army was funded by Western powers.

And I heard that Lenin was also bribed by Western powers. O_o Did they just decide to have a laugh and sit around with popcorn, watching us kill each other? *picked up the banhammer and went to fight the bourgeoisie*

I heard that Lenin was also bribed by Western powers O_o Did they just decide to have a laugh and sit around with popcorn, watching us kill each other? *grabbed a banhammer and went to fight the bourgeoisie*

Kolchak and the White Army were definitely financed by England and others. With Lenin, it's a different story - the revolution took place during World War I, and there was a theory that Lenin was financed by Germany, but the revolution and civil war lasted long after the war, so the question of financing remains only at the level of unsubstantiated speculation...

The White Army was financed by Western powers who wanted a government in Russia that would be responsive to their decisions... That's why the USSR refused to simply acknowledge it...

By "financed," do you mean when the official Russian government took out a huge amount of loans? That's why they refused to acknowledge it, without returning those loans.

In general, if we consider the political motives, each side believes that it is pure and righteous, and everyone else is "evil."

It has always been this way, and probably will continue to be.

The political system of the United States corresponded to the views of the leading European powers. The "Western world" became dependent on the United States...

I don't see the connection between these two sentences. And besides, Europe really became dependent on the United States only after World War II, when the latter distributed a lot of loans and ultimately became quite wealthy.

Despite all this, as long as Japan did not attack the United States, as a member of the Axis alliance (Germany, Japan, Italy, etc.), they were generally indifferent to the fact that the infrastructure of Europe was collapsing and millions were dying...

Well, you can get used to the United States' policy on such issues :3

With Lenin, it's a different story - the revolution took place during World War I, and there was a theory that Lenin was financed by Germany, but the revolution and civil war lasted long after the war, so the question of financing remains only at the level of unsubstantiated speculation...

In general, there is an opinion that the Germans initially organized this, but then it got out of their control. In my opinion, this is quite likely.

Freedom = omnipotence = independence = ... Death, because I haven't come up with any other way to achieve independence yet. I mean absolute freedom and independence, in every sense of the word.

By "funding," do you mean when the official Russian government took out a huge amount of loans? That's why they refused to acknowledge it, without repaying those very loans.

By "funding," I meant the supply of Western European weapons to the White Army, including equipment...

I don't see the connection between these two sentences. And besides, Europe really became dependent on the USA only after World War II, when the latter gave out a lot of loans and ultimately got very rich. Well, you can get used to the US's policy on such issues.

No - after the First World War, by providing financial assistance, etc., the USA became a superpower. Proof of the USA's very strong influence on Europe is the so-called "Great Depression" of 1929-33. That's what they called the economic crisis in the USA. Unemployment, a fall in stock prices, the closure of banks and exchanges, a collapse of the stock market... The "depression" spread from the USA to Europe, where unemployment rose massively to frightening levels. Today's crisis can serve as an analogy...