Posts from [ANOTHER FLAME WAR] Are dragons overpowered or not? Auto-translated

P.S. Once, we walled up a beetle in clay, like in a tomb... well, we wanted to, and I brought the clay from the river, but while catching the beetle for this purpose, I broke my finger, and we had to postpone it for a couple of months. But by that time, the clay had already deteriorated, and the tomb didn't turn out very well.

And that's it. As for the objections about "Dragons are animals. Humans are intelligent" - IMHO, it just looks like a broken record with the addition of stereotypes and a certain amount of racism. That's it :P

I noticed that Revan, besides removing the entity, doesn't offer anything else as a solution to the problems.

Dragons don't exist. People, on the other hand, do. That's it, you're done.

Morning, I’m telling you that dragons are just as intelligent and can talk. I’m not denying that there are also deer, they are a bit dull, but mostly they are wise, only usually they are evil, negative characters. And the arguments – I’ve already said, books, movies, and games confirm my facts.

You were talking about pictures like "Dragon eats," "Dragon burns a city," "Dragon reads a book," etc.
You also eat, that's a fact. You walk, you wash your face, you watch TV, you make a website, etc. It's the same, the same everyday actions.
Should I give examples of such actions for elves, orcs, and cockroaches?

Also, I fundamentally dislike the division into human and animal, it is incorrect, because a human is also an animal. It's just that from a human's point of view, he is a more intelligent being than the rest of the animals, fungi, viruses, and plants (did I forget someone?)

beetles emerge from the anthill with a bunch of ants on their backs, but they never leave alive)

People eat, use the restroom, and sleep not because they are intelligent, but because these actions are necessary. But, I hope it goes without saying that, in addition to their physiological needs, they engage in many other activities?
This is not applicable to dragons, which, like any animal we can observe in the real world, are only concerned with satisfying the aforementioned needs. Of course, even the dullest of these reptiles, due to their somewhat magical nature, is considered more intelligent than many animals. Roughly on the level of a dog or even a mentally challenged child. But this "intelligence" only serves to optimize the satisfaction of those needs.

=^_^=

Is this principle called "if the facts contradict the theory, then too bad for the facts"?))) My advice: put this principle far away if you don't want to have problems with communication.