Skip to content

Posts from TC3 League. Regular Season.

5.0 (1 rating)
In reply to Piterius
User Avatar
#213
Auto-translated
Piterius
Yes, I lost even on the black map.
I would argue with anyone who says they lost on the black map.
In reply to Dirty_Player
User Avatar
#214
Auto-translated
Dirty_Player
I would argue with anyone who lost even at the beginning of the game.
If I had the time, I would prove to you that there's not much to argue about. In theory, I'll say that I don't have enough money, about 50,000, for all the troops, even with selling artifacts for 15,000. In practice, I can only take Berserkers and hope that my opponent will position their troops favorably for them. It's very difficult to win in a fair fight without half of my troops or one of the units that can be obtained for the average artifact cost. You can also try the Sylvan option, but I think it will be weak. But Barbarian-Rampart is a very good combination. There is enough money for absolutely everything, even without selling artifacts for 15,000, and we get many good attack groups (Golden Golems, Bears, Griffins, Ogres, Unique units...).
Всем удачи ! И Морали !
In reply to Wlk777
User Avatar
#215
Auto-translated
At first glance, Rampart + Barbarian have at least as good a chance. The other pair heavily relies on antimoral or aging spells, so I think the Barbarian/Rampart combo has the edge. Either give up 100k or bet on the Lesser Spell.
Земля нуля.
Все в ней нулево и кукольно.
In reply to Oelm
User Avatar
#216
Auto-translated
Oelm
At first glance, Rampart + Barbarian definitely have a good chance.
That's for sure ;)
Oelm
The other pair has a strong hope for antimoral or aging, but otherwise, I think the main hero will win. The option is either to surrender 100K or bet on Luck.
All of this is a weak hope. It seems the probability of antimoral is 5%, on average, no more than 1 stack will be affected by antimoral, are you counting on unrealistic luck? :confused: Surrendering 100K is probably optimal, but the chances are still weak. Luck is also a weak chance; either there won't be enough money or skills.
Всем удачи ! И Морали !
User Avatar
#217
Auto-translated
I would like to play against a not-so-strong player so that I have at least some chance. 355106298
Drink up, then I'll refill your glass...

Ты будешь жрать мир, или мир будет жрать тебя — в любом случае все о'кей, все идет по плану.
In reply to Soroka
User Avatar
#218
Auto-translated
Played a practice match with Valentin. Tower + Necropolis against Rampart + Barbarian. Survived with >5000 HP. )) Soroka, let's have a tournament match!
Земля нуля.
Все в ней нулево и кукольно.
In reply to Oelm
User Avatar
#219
Auto-translated
Oelm
Played a practice match with Valentin. Tower + Necropolis against Rampart + Barbarian. Survived with >5000 HP.
The thing is, when playing against opponents who take a long time to think and with an unstable internet connection (which tends to drop every hour or so), it's hard to think calmly. It was enough to calculate the opponent's predictable tactic and take Berserk with a Sphere, and it would have been very funny. Besides, at the end of the battle, my units had almost the same amount of HP =) + my resistance and the opponent's antimoral didn't trigger, and as usual, my birds attacked without a bolt, and the horses with double damage. With such a set of luck, you can win any match :smile32:
Всем удачи ! И Морали !
In reply to Wlk777
User Avatar
#220
Auto-translated
I counted 5000 after finishing off your barbarians and wood elves. Luck was definitely a factor, of course.
Земля нуля.
Все в ней нулево и кукольно.
In reply to Oelm
User Avatar
#221
Auto-translated
Oelm
I counted 5000 after I finished off your barbarians and wood elves. Luck was definitely a factor too.
Analyzing this battle, I came to the conclusion that the main reason for the defeat was my several major mistakes (I clearly rushed too much). In principle, if this battle were to repeat (from an autosave, with the same troops, artifacts, and skills), I am confident in my victory regardless of my opponent's luck, and I'm even willing to bet money on it.
Всем удачи ! И Морали !
In reply to Oelm
User Avatar
#222
Auto-translated
Oelm
I counted 5000 after I finished off your barbarians and wood elves. Luck was definitely involved too.

Awesome! You proved it with actions, not just words!
РП (Реальное папство!)
*Автосейвы не беру и не даю.

Скачать WT (Чат, античит, одновременный ход) http://www.heroeswt.net/download.php

Награда Лучшему игроку сезона Осень 2009 за Оплот
In reply to Forrest
User Avatar
#223
Auto-translated
Forrest
Awesome! He proved his point with actions, not just words!
I've beaten you several times, and besides, one rushed battle with major mistakes doesn't mean anything at all. Now let's see if he agrees to play the same match with a more significant incentive.
Всем удачи ! И Морали !
In reply to Wlk777
User Avatar
#224
Auto-translated
Wlk777
FF, I've beaten you several times, and besides, a single match played in a hurry with major mistakes doesn't mean anything at all. Now let's see if he agrees to play the same match with a more real incentive.

Lol. Well done for beating me. What does that have to do with anything?
I've beaten many more people, so what?
You said that he's a weak player and gave reasons. That's why he deserves respect.

And "with major mistakes" is exactly what it means. The one who makes mistakes loses in Town Kill 3.

Regarding "more real motivation," everyone plays with that in all tournaments, without any money involved.

He also wrote to me in Battle.net, "you're not cool at all" and lowered my morale. Well done. Keep it up.
РП (Реальное папство!)
*Автосейвы не беру и не даю.

Скачать WT (Чат, античит, одновременный ход) http://www.heroeswt.net/download.php

Награда Лучшему игроку сезона Осень 2009 за Оплот
In reply to Soroka
User Avatar
#225
Auto-translated
Wlk777
If you had the time, I would prove to you that there's really not much to argue about ;)
Before arguing, sometimes it's worth checking things out once ;)
Soroka
I'd like to play against a not-so-strong player
so that I would at least have some chance )))
If you're looking for not-so-strong players, you've come to the wrong place, everyone here is strong :)
Want to learn how to play - look for the strongest! :)
In reply to Forrest
User Avatar
#226
Auto-translated
Forrest
Lol. Well, good for you for winning. What does this have to do with anything?
I've won many more times, so what?
You said that the pairing was weak and gave a reason. That's why he deserves respect.

And "with the most egregious mistakes" means exactly that. The one who makes mistakes loses in Tournament 3.

Regarding "more realistic motivation," everyone plays for it in all Tournaments. Without any money involved.
For those who are slow, I repeat: one stupidly lost game means absolutely nothing and doesn't prove anything. I stand by my opinion and am even willing to back it up with money. By the way, all such disputes with this player have ended in my favor :cool:, and I must give him credit, he always pays his debts. And by the way, I'll reveal a terrible secret: many Tournaments are held with a prize fund, can you imagine such an incredible thing :D

Added after 1 minute
Forrest

He also wrote to me in Battle.net, "you're not cool at all" and lowered my morale. Good job! Keep it up.
I'm more amused by your signature :D
Всем удачи ! И Морали !
In reply to Wlk777
User Avatar
#227
Auto-translated
Wlk777
And by the way, I'll reveal a terrible secret – many tournaments are held with a prize pool. Imagine such an incredible thing :D

Added 1 minute ago

What amuses me even more is your signature :D

"Very many" – how many exactly?

I doubt you know what it means.

Someone is in a tank, and someone is in a halo, and it seems to them that everyone except them is in a tank :D
РП (Реальное папство!)
*Автосейвы не беру и не даю.

Скачать WT (Чат, античит, одновременный ход) http://www.heroeswt.net/download.php

Награда Лучшему игроку сезона Осень 2009 за Оплот

Statistics

Welcome our newest member: artem

Users Online 3 users 1470 guests