Connection ErrorBad RequestSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Posts from Heroes 5 – “A masterpiece or an unfinished product?”
Well, I agree! They don't release a beta so that everyone loses faith in the game.
Nah, they gave it to us so we'd stop bothering the developers;) They're getting bombarded with questions, so they're trying to buy time until the release... Don't despair, everything should be alright.:) I'm hoping for that.:D
The game will be good, even great. Of course, there are some drawbacks, but judging by the information, most of them have been fixed or are being fixed, so I think that by the release, the only real drawback that will remain is the parodic nature of some of the creatures (but this is generally tolerable).
The game will be good, even great. Of course, there are some drawbacks, but judging by the information, most of them have been fixed or are being fixed, so I think that by the release, the only real drawback that will remain is the parodic nature of some of the creatures (but that's tolerable).
Nival isn't releasing garbage! Plus, if there's another beta and more bugs, there will be even more polishing of the details.
Well, the Watch is for those who like it. I heard they're releasing an edition for hardcore tacticians.
And has your opinion of Nival changed after DAK? Well, so what if it's licensed? Maybe they gained experience that will be useful for the Heroes series.
As for the Sentinels, it's for those who enjoy it. I heard they're releasing an edition for hardcore tacticians.
If Sentinels is for a specific audience, then Shadows of Darkness is also for a specific audience, but Shadows of Darkness is a hit, which cannot be said about Sentinels. I would say they are fixing the shortcomings and, moreover, are pushing the improved game again for money. In total, they made money twice from one product... Night
And has your attitude towards Nival changed after Sentinels? Well, it was just a licensed game... Maybe they gained experience that way for Heroes:)
My attitude towards Nival has changed after Sentinels and continues to change as they work on Heroes. And not for the better.
I would also add Blitzkrieg here. Just as an example of relentless money-grabbing. So many add-ons (10 in total - all official), and yet there's no real improvement in quality... Let's hope that doesn't happen with Heroes.
Nival does what Ubisoft ordered them to do, this has already been mentioned, meaning written.
Well yes, of course they have absolutely nothing to do with it... They are just the developer after all... :D I can practically see Ubisoft giving orders to Nival: -No more than 40 spells -No more than six on a spellbook page -Battlefield no larger than 8*10 -Must deviate from canon and make combat non-turn-based -Under no circumstances create more than six Castles -There should be no Orcs in H5, otherwise people won't buy it...:D -A horse as a cursor is unacceptable and many, many other things... As if they have absolutely nothing better to do... And the way Nival denies their own shortcomings by shifting the blame to Ubisoft—that doesn't interest me...