Skip to content

Posts from Round table

5.0 (2 ratings)
In reply to Samurai
User Avatar
Auto-translated
Interesting, very interesting... are there still bugs in SoD? ...:smile01:
С истиной где-то рядом...





Лето 2010.
In reply to Дубровин Павел
User Avatar
Auto-translated
Dubrovin Pavel
Interesting, very interesting... are there still bugs in SoD? ...:smile01:
There aren't just a few, there are tons of bugs there. Just look at the viewing mechanic during another player's turn!
In reply to Dirty_Player
User Avatar
Auto-translated
Just watching someone else play is worth something!
So, I don't understand – can we use this or not?
In reply to Kluka
User Avatar
Auto-translated
Kluka
So I don't get it — can this be used or not?
By the way, that is a very interesting question. It seems everyone uses it in SoD since it cannot be tracked, but the final word belongs to the leader.
User Avatar
Auto-translated
The main highlight is viewing the structures in the opponent's castle and the presence of secondary units (including native ones, if they exist). This allows you to assess the opponent's chances, their economy, and the availability of troops when taking castles...
By the way, I've been caught out by this more than once, by Dubrovin and Lebron...
In my opinion, it's a subtle but important aspect that I didn't know about until I started playing on World of Xeen!!
Ушел с героев, пока пряники)
In reply to SEM_56
User Avatar
Auto-translated
TE bugs:
1) It is possible to lose experience for a unit.
2) Titans and Black Dragons do not have the "Hatred" ability, although they should.

Even though the question wasn't directed at me.
In reply to Oelm
User Avatar
Auto-translated
Oelm
2) Titans and Black Dragons don't have the "Hate" ability, even though they should.
Where did you get this information from?
In reply to asm
User Avatar
Auto-translated
Where did you get this information from???
It's written there, so it should be correct. (Did I understand the question correctly?)
User Avatar
Auto-translated
Tell a newbie how to view the buildings in an enemy castle:confused:
I just learned from Pasha that you can see the enemy's secondary structures without leaving your own castle... Well, you live and learn:smile43:
Пусть мой враг будет силен и страшен. Если я поборю его, то не буду чувствовать стыда.
In reply to numOne
User Avatar
Auto-translated
numOne
Tell a newbie how to view the buildings in an enemy castle:confused:
I only recently learned from Pasha that you can see the enemy's secondary structures without leaving your own castle... Well, you live and learn:smile43:

Buildings (Stronghold, Castle), Income, Garrisoned Troops – yes, you can see that, but nothing more...:)
С истиной где-то рядом...





Лето 2010.
In reply to Дубровин Павел
User Avatar
Auto-translated
In previous posts, we discussed what to do with those who don't confirm their reports. But there's another category. Those who lose a match, roughly two days before the final battle (if it even happens), find excuses to not finish the match, even though they continue to play on the forum. What are your thoughts?
In reply to Oelm
User Avatar
Auto-translated
Oelm
In previous posts, we discussed what to do with those who don't confirm their reports. But there's another category. Those who lose a match, approximately a couple of days before the final battle (if it will happen, of course), find excuses to not finish the match, even though they continue to play on the forum. What are your opinions?


Judges need to intervene here.

If the judges (vbn, one of them, if I'm not mistaken) don't object, we can send them the save file.
Ideally, the judge should make a decision based on the balance of power, as well as the fact that one of the parties is prolonging the game.
The judge can either immediately decide on the victory of one player or offer both parties a certain amount of time to finish the match.
In the event that a player continues to avoid finishing the match, they will be declared the loser.
С истиной где-то рядом...





Лето 2010.
In reply to Captain
User Avatar
Auto-translated
Captain
People like Navukh on the forum would be screaming that "anyone discussing bugs and teaching newbies how to exploit them should be banned."
Why are you describing this here, smart guy? Did you just learn about it, and now you can't wait to share it with the whole world?
There are dozens of such bugs in Heroes, and many people know about them, but publicly teaching people how to exploit them seems stupid to me.
This bug can still be found by analyzing a save file, but there are bugs that are almost impossible to find.
That's why the forum doesn't publish a list of all the bugs in the rules!
And they ban people for discussing them.
I suggest that we still discuss all the bugs that have been noticed, perhaps without revealing their essence, and agree to either allow or prohibit them. For example, the bug with selling artifacts at the maximum price. Personally, I am against using any bugs, such as, for example, taking the maximum Hive with one un-upgraded Hydra hero on auto-battle, but that is just my opinion.

Added 1 minute ago
Oelm
In previous posts, we discussed what to do with those who don't confirm reports. But there is another category. Those who lose a game, approximately a couple of days before the final battle (if it will happen, of course), find excuses to not finish the game, even though they continue to play on the forum. What are your thoughts?
I think we should publicly announce the names of such people.
In reply to Wlk777
Auto-translated
Wlk777
I suggest that we still discuss all the bugs that have been noticed, perhaps without revealing their essence, and agree on whether to allow them or ban them.
+1
Wlk777

There is an opinion to publicly announce the names of such comrades.
This is a very controversial issue, because first you need to determine the true reasons for the player's unwillingness (or inability?) to finish the game. This is almost impossible to do. I see a way out either in discussing the game time limits together with the completion time in the season rules, so that, for example, when the game (or completion) is delayed beyond the specified time (for example, a month), a previously agreed "judge" is called in to either determine the guilt in the unfinished game and impose a technical defeat, or if the guilt of both players is equal, make a decision. But this path seems tedious and unpromising to me. The option of simply not playing with such a player in "friendly games" (unless the tournament bracket brings them together) is much simpler and does not bother anyone.

Statistics

Welcome our newest member: Emil