Posts from Round table

You can immediately tell it's a complete newbie in a random game :) This brings to mind the words of Nebuchadnezzar, aka Captain, who claimed that he had already studied everything in the game and knew all the tricks and features of the heroes.

This is a tactic for 2 minutes of control; if you're not playing against a newbie after 6 minutes, it's just ridiculous. They'll break Utopia while you're running around the map.

I strongly advise you to buy goggles :).

Where did the powerful stack of 5 angels come from if one was already defeated? There will be 4 angels. And in the case of the horses, there will be 3 angels + 4 horses + the remaining units. This option is not only stronger, but it will also be enough for a couple of turns, including against a maximum-level enemy. And the 4 angels will be running around it, drooling and looking for something to attack.

You can immediately tell it's a complete newbie in a random game :) This brings to mind the words of Nebuchadnezzar, aka Captain, who claims that he has already studied everything in the game and knows all the tricks and features of the heroes.

We either read with difficulty or it takes time to understand (C) :D? I wrote that in a REAL game, finding a food source is not a problem, and a book is not rare at all, so it is quite possible to save both angels. But I wouldn't guarantee that 3 angels and 4 horses, even with fifty Marks, will take down the maximum difficulty enemy.

The mechanism is simple – there are many griffins, so they believe the battle is already won. Consequently, they attack those who are more dangerous (in their opinion), while also considering the possibility of surrender.

+1

The mechanism is simple – there are many griffons, so they believe the battle is already won. Consequently, they attack those who are more dangerous (in their opinion), with adjustments for surrendering, of course. In this case, the poks are clearly more dangerous to them, as the blocked marks deal very little damage.

Although there is an element of randomness here. In different tests, the griffons attacked differently. Sometimes they attacked not the poks, but the single griffon that stands above the marks. In the third game, they didn't attack the marks at all. In the maximum difficulty, in one of the attempts, they did attack them.

Well, try it :). Maybe you'll learn something.

I said above that even without angels, the maximum difficulty fell, although with some difficulty.

In one of the attempts, they got wrecked at the maximum difficulty.

as they say in mathematics, Q.E.D.
you have one attempt, while I already have over 10 years of experience :)

plus you play as Castle without morale, and I... once played against a Castle player.. by the 2nd week I already had 8 angels and he... but for some reason half my other army had fallen, while his was all intact.. for some reason my griffins got morale and threw away troops, but this Castle player had almost no losses after all the cons.. considering that we both know how to position and neither of us has mass slow ;)

This is all wonderful, but the tests were conducted in TE, right? (judging by the phrase about disabled morale for griffins). In SoD, as a rule, if my griffins have the opportunity, they either bite or block shooters, even if I have more than enough troops and they're unlikely to "assume" that the battle is won for them.

4 horses, fifty marks and a few pokemons take the max con without a book? :eek: Fantasy or TE? :confused:

No, not so; danger plays a secondary role here. Griffins, dragonflies, dragons, etc., apparently try to strike with max efficiency, therefore blocking the bows—even while taking out about 20 level-1s in the process—is considered a successful move.

If you only consider one move, then of course, you don't necessarily need to attack the archers, but griffins often attack a single griffin, basilisk, etc. (for different factions), and a stack of archers will deal more damage, even with a one-move analysis.

the strongest monster of level 7