New Year's Duel Tournament. — Tournament History online

Statistics

Registered: 7/2/2008 3:43 PM UTC

Posts: 638

2/15/2009 6:00 AM UTC #227

Auto-translated

VaRvArHawk

VaRvArHawK (Necropolis, Naadir) lost to Vip.rus (Inferno, Nibros)
VaRvArHawK (Inferno, Marbas) defeated Vip.rus (Necropolis, Naadir)
VaRvArHawK (Orcs, Goshak) defeated Vip.rus (Mages, Ora)

Final score: 2:1 in favor of VaRvArHawK
Thank you for the games.

Confirmed.

In reply to Smerti_PO

Statistics

Registered: 3/19/2008 4:38 AM UTC

Posts: 194

2/15/2009 6:03 AM UTC #228

Auto-translated

Smerti_PO

ArhAngeL (Orc, Kragg) defeated Smerti_Po (Elf, Anven)
Smerti_Po (Orc, Hagresh) defeated ArhAngeL (Elf, Gilraen)
ArhAngeL (Human, Axel) lost to Smerti_Po (Wizard, Narhiz)

Final score: 2-1 in favor of Smerti_Po.

Thank you for the games.

I confirm Smerti's report. Who knew he would be so lucky with the artifacts and mass slaughters, while I wouldn't have anything good happen to me. Oh well, I'm a loser.
Thank you for the games!

Клан "Хранители Небесных Врат"

████████████████████████ - сотри защитный слой и узнай подпись.

Statistics

Registered: 9/9/2006 8:16 AM UTC

Posts: 83

2/15/2009 6:06 AM UTC #229

Auto-translated

Hero_of_heroes (Dwarves, Ingvar) def. Gastello (Sylvan, Ossir)
Hero_of_heroes (Sylvan, Ilfina) def. Gastello (Dwarves, Ingvar)
Hero_of_heroes (Haven, Iris) def. Gastello (Haven, Laslo)

Result: 3-0 in favor of Hero_of_heroes.

Confirmed!!

Also, I played with MaddenMax a while ago, about 2 weeks ago, 2 games, I'm leading 2-0, we started a 3rd game, but the opponent hasn't shown up since, I don't know where to find him. If he appears, let him write in ICQ.

In reply to Gаstello

Statistics

Registered: 7/10/2008 3:04 PM UTC

Posts: 4,372

2/15/2009 9:23 AM UTC #230

Auto-translated

WisTrit(Dungeon, Sinithar) defeated Kitsune(Sylvan, Ilfina)
Kitsune(Dungeon, Waishan) defeated WisTrit(Sylvan, Dirael)
WisTrit(Dungeon, Letos) defeated Kitsune(Dungeon, Waishan)
result: 2 - 1 in favor of WisTrit

In the first game, I found a trident and chain lightning, plus a lot of spells. And a lot of defense for the Warlock :) I managed to win.
In the second game, I found a summoning book, and Dirael, plus a +1 damage amulet and boots of speed. But I lost.
In the third game, Letos was almost a Warlock-Warrior. He cast plague and then vampirism on everyone.

Tomorrow holds no promises
Except the ones we've made

In reply to Wistrit

Statistics

Registered: 9/5/2007 6:48 AM UTC

Posts: 393

2/15/2009 9:29 AM UTC #231

Auto-translated

WisTrit

WisTrit(Dungeon, Sinithar) defeated Kitsune(Sylvan, Ilfina)
Kitsune(Dungeon, Vaishan) defeated WisTrit(Sylvan, Dirael)
WisTrit(Dungeon, Letos) defeated Kitsune(Dungeon, Vaishan)
result: 2 - 1 in favor of WisTrit

Yep) Confirmed! Thanks for the game!

:smile41: Vaishaan!:smile41:

In reply to Kitsune

Statistics

Registered: 6/13/2008 5:37 PM UTC

Posts: 54

2/16/2009 8:24 AM UTC #233

Auto-translated

Hero_of_heroes_vs_Zilo: 2-1 in favor of Zilo. Details from him; I'm just rushing to post before the group stage ends.

In reply to KillAndAction

Statistics

Registered: 1/9/2008 2:34 PM UTC

Posts: 27

2/16/2009 8:25 AM UTC #234

Auto-translated

Zilo (Necropolis, Naadir) def. Heroofheroes (Stronghold, Telsek)
Zilo (Stronghold, Haggeesh) def. Heroofheroes (Necropolis, Lucretia)
Zilo (Dungeon, Sorgal) lose Heroofheroes (Academy, Jhora).

Final score: 2-1

Thanks for the games!

In reply to Zilo

Statistics

Registered: 1/24/2008 5:55 PM UTC

Posts: 808

2/16/2009 8:46 AM UTC #235

Auto-translated

Zilo

)
Zilo(Dungeon, Sorgal) lose Heroofheroes(Academy, Jhora).

I apologize, but could you please share the replay of this match? It would be very interesting to see. Or at least, could you share Sorgal's build?

So many centuries
So many Gods
We were the prisoners of our own fantasy
But now we are marching
Against these Gods
I'm the wizard, I will change it all
Valhalla - Deliverance
Why've you ever forgotten me

19.08.2008 СК Олимпийский.Я запомню это навсегда!!!

Как играть онлайн в Герои 5??Ответ здесь

In reply to ValgallaWolf

Statistics

Registered: 6/13/2008 5:37 PM UTC

Posts: 54

2/16/2009 9:03 PM UTC #237

Auto-translated

Of course, you can replay it:)
http://webfile.ru/2637565

In reply to Hero_of_heroes

Statistics

Registered: 7/10/2008 3:04 PM UTC

Posts: 4,372

2/17/2009 12:55 PM UTC #238

Auto-translated

Minor changes have been made to the table of games for the second stage, as one game (Gastello - MadMax) was not included.

There may be questions regarding the assignment of "1"s. They were not assigned randomly based on the whims of tea aromas that have taken over my mind.
Everything is based on a certain logic.
Thus, I tried not to offend anyone.
This has virtually no impact on the ranking.

Statistics

Registered: 10/2/2007 6:58 PM UTC

Posts: 67

2/17/2009 7:14 PM UTC #239

Auto-translated

Some nonsense:
in all games, all players with the 5th, 7th, 10th, 17th, and 19th ranks should have their scores set to zero...
Otherwise, it's unfair...
Of course, it's up to the judge to make such decisions, but fairness should be paramount, in my opinion...

Added after 10 minutes
The practice of setting the scores of participants who have played less than half of the games to zero has been confirmed by many tournaments, and I think creating a precedent like: "I can do whatever I want with the scores of such players" will not lead to anything good, in my opinion.

Модератор
all4heroes.net/forum
Он лежит на своих сокровищах,и в сердце его зависть и злоба. Не верь, что голова его склонилась во сне, если глаза его закрыты. Дракон не спит никогда.

In reply to JackFromShadowLand

Statistics

Registered: 7/10/2008 3:04 PM UTC

Posts: 4,372

2/18/2009 1:53 AM UTC #240

Auto-translated

I don't do whatever I want with the players' points; you just need to take a closer look. If you calculate everything without these points, the order of places will remain the same. But what if someone played against these 5, 7, 10, and so on players? Is it pleasant to part with the earned points?

The practice where the points of participants who have played less than half of the games are set to zero has been confirmed by many Tournaments.

I didn't want to remove Vsev from the table, but I also didn't want to let him pass to the next stage because he doesn't respond to messages in ICQ or to PMs on the forum. He didn't respond to me either. And if we follow the method of "removing everyone who has played less than 10 games," he wouldn't pass in any case. Without the points of "non-playing" players, the places after 8th: 9. JackFromShadowLand 10. Vip.rus 11. Leolopus 12. Lord Vampire 13. KillAndAction 14. Kitsune 15. VaRvArHawK - 9. JackFromShadowLand - 10. Vsev - 11. Vip.rus - 12. Leolopus - 13. Lord Vampire - 14. KillAndAction - 15. VaRvArHawk - 16. Kitsune Vsev is gone; is it much better now? If you remove all these points, those who played will be dissatisfied; I guarantee it. I am being asked to burn down the forest where bandits and refugees are hiding, without offending anyone in the process:rolleyes: I tried, and this is what I got.

Statistics

Registered: 10/2/2007 6:58 PM UTC

Posts: 67

2/18/2009 8:51 AM UTC #241

Auto-translated

So, those who played against players who played less than half of the games and scored, say, 2-3 points, get an advantage over those who didn't play against them and were automatically given a score of 1. It's simply accepted practice not to consider such players (less than half of the games), i.e., they are as if they didn't participate. That would be fairer, and the ranking would be different...
But all this is just a side note, for the future... Since a decision has been made, let it be. ;)

Модератор
all4heroes.net/forum
Он лежит на своих сокровищах,и в сердце его зависть и злоба. Не верь, что голова его склонилась во сне, если глаза его закрыты. Дракон не спит никогда.

In reply to JackFromShadowLand

Statistics

Registered: 7/2/2008 3:43 PM UTC

Posts: 638

2/18/2009 10:25 AM UTC #242

Auto-translated

JackFromShadowLand

So, those who played against players who played less than half of the games and scored, say, 2-3 points, get an advantage over those who didn't play against them and were automatically given a score of 1. It would be fairer to simply not take such players (less than half of the games) into account, i.e., they would be considered as not participating. That way, the standings would be different...
But all this is just a side note, for the future... Since a decision has already been made, let it be. ;)

Let me give just one example to support your point about fairness!
Alex-NV made it to the next round, even though he didn't play against me and some other players, even though I messaged him without success! How can a player who refuses to play make it to the next round???!!! This is the first absurdity that comes to mind; I don't want to offend anyone personally:eek:

In reply to Vip.rus

Statistics

Registered: 8/11/2008 10:22 AM UTC

Posts: 262

2/18/2009 11:26 AM UTC #243

Auto-translated

Vip.rus

Let me give just one example to support your words!
Alex-NV made it to the next round, even though he didn't play against me and some other players, even though I messaged him without any result! How can a player who refuses to play advance to the next round???!!! This is the first absurdity that comes to mind; I don't want to offend anyone personally:eek:

Actually, the stage lasted a month, so there was enough time, and everyone was in equal conditions. It's not very good to discuss individual players, but note that Alex also took a risk by not agreeing to play, because he was in 8th place and anyone could overtake him.

Reading content in

Interface language

Posts from New Year's Duel Tournament.

Statistics

Library

Users Online 5 users 1310 guests

Today's Visitors 12