HeroesWorld
  • Log in
  • Create account
  • Mode
    Interface scale

    Loads video thumbnails from YouTube, which lets it see your IP address. Off until you turn it on, and remembered in this browser only.

    Recolours text in posts that would be hard to read on this theme. Off by default, so posts look exactly as their authors wrote them.

New Year's Duel Tournament.

Tournament History online Closed Topic
No ratings yet — be the first to rate!
In reply to VaRvArHawk
Offline Vip.rus
Registered:
Posts: 596
#227
Auto-translated
VaRvArHawk
VaRvArHawK (Necropolis, Naadir) lost to Vip.rus (Inferno, Nibros)
VaRvArHawK (Inferno, Marbas) defeated Vip.rus (Necropolis, Naadir)
VaRvArHawK (Orcs, Goshak) defeated Vip.rus (Mages, Ora)

Final score: 2:1 in favor of VaRvArHawK
Thank you for the games.

Confirmed.
0
⚖️
0
In reply to Smerti_PO
User Avatar
Offline Lady Revan
Registered:
Posts: 199
#228
Auto-translated
Smerti_PO
ArhAngeL (Orc, Kragg) defeated Smerti_Po (Elf, Anven)
Smerti_Po (Orc, Hagresh) defeated ArhAngeL (Elf, Gilraen)
ArhAngeL (Human, Axel) lost to Smerti_Po (Wizard, Narhiz)

Final score: 2-1 in favor of Smerti_Po.

Thank you for the games.
I confirm Smerti's report. Who knew he would be so lucky with the artifacts and mass slaughters, while I wouldn't have anything good happen to me. Oh well, I'm a loser.
Thank you for the games!
Клан "Хранители Небесных Врат"

████████████████████████ - сотри защитный слой и узнай подпись.
1
⚖️
0
User Avatar
Offline Gаstello
Registered:
Posts: 83
#229
Auto-translated
Hero_of_heroes (Dwarves, Ingvar) def. Gastello (Sylvan, Ossir)
Hero_of_heroes (Sylvan, Ilfina) def. Gastello (Dwarves, Ingvar)
Hero_of_heroes (Haven, Iris) def. Gastello (Haven, Laslo)

Result: 3-0 in favor of Hero_of_heroes.
Confirmed!!

Also, I played with MaddenMax a while ago, about 2 weeks ago, 2 games, I'm leading 2-0, we started a 3rd game, but the opponent hasn't shown up since, I don't know where to find him. If he appears, let him write in ICQ.
0
⚖️
0
In reply to Gаstello
User Avatar
Offline Wistrit
Registered:
Posts: 11,962
#230
Auto-translated
WisTrit(Dungeon, Sinithar) defeated Kitsune(Sylvan, Ilfina)
Kitsune(Dungeon, Waishan) defeated WisTrit(Sylvan, Dirael)
WisTrit(Dungeon, Letos) defeated Kitsune(Dungeon, Waishan)
result: 2 - 1 in favor of WisTrit

In the first game, I found a trident and chain lightning, plus a lot of spells. And a lot of defense for the Warlock :) I managed to win.
In the second game, I found a summoning book, and Dirael, plus a +1 damage amulet and boots of speed. But I lost.
In the third game, Letos was almost a Warlock-Warrior. He cast plague and then vampirism on everyone.
Tomorrow holds no promises
Except the ones we've made
1
⚖️
0
In reply to Wistrit
User Avatar
Offline Kitsune
Registered:
Posts: 867
#231
Auto-translated
WisTrit
WisTrit(Dungeon, Sinithar) defeated Kitsune(Sylvan, Ilfina)
Kitsune(Dungeon, Vaishan) defeated WisTrit(Sylvan, Dirael)
WisTrit(Dungeon, Letos) defeated Kitsune(Dungeon, Vaishan)
result: 2 - 1 in favor of WisTrit
Yep) Confirmed! Thanks for the game!

:smile41: Vaishaan!:smile41:
1
⚖️
0
In reply to Kitsune
Offline Hero_of_heroes
Registered:
Posts: 54
#233
Auto-translated
Hero_of_heroes_vs_Zilo: 2-1 in favor of Zilo. Details from him; I'm just rushing to post before the group stage ends.
0
⚖️
0
In reply to KillAndAction
Offline Zilo
Registered:
Posts: 27
#234
Auto-translated
Zilo (Necropolis, Naadir) def. Heroofheroes (Stronghold, Telsek)
Zilo (Stronghold, Haggeesh) def. Heroofheroes (Necropolis, Lucretia)
Zilo (Dungeon, Sorgal) lose Heroofheroes (Academy, Jhora).

Final score: 2-1

Thanks for the games!
0
⚖️
0
In reply to Zilo
User Avatar
Offline ValgallaWolf
Registered:
Posts: 946
#235
Auto-translated
Zilo
)
Zilo(Dungeon, Sorgal) lose Heroofheroes(Academy, Jhora).


I apologize, but could you please share the replay of this match? It would be very interesting to see. Or at least, could you share Sorgal's build?
So many centuries
So many Gods
We were the prisoners of our own fantasy
But now we are marching
Against these Gods
I'm the wizard, I will change it all
Valhalla - Deliverance
Why've you ever forgotten me

19.08.2008 СК Олимпийский.Я запомню это навсегда!!!

Как играть онлайн в Герои 5??Ответ здесь
0
⚖️
0
In reply to Hero_of_heroes
User Avatar
Offline Wistrit
Registered:
Posts: 11,962
#238
Auto-translated
Minor changes have been made to the table of games for the second stage, as one game (Gastello - MadMax) was not included.


There may be questions regarding the assignment of "1"s. They were not assigned randomly based on the whims of tea aromas that have taken over my mind.
Everything is based on a certain logic.
Thus, I tried not to offend anyone.
This has virtually no impact on the ranking.
1
⚖️
0
User Avatar
Offline JackFromShadowLand
Registered:
Posts: 68
#239
Auto-translated
Some nonsense:
in all games, all players with the 5th, 7th, 10th, 17th, and 19th ranks should have their scores set to zero...
Otherwise, it's unfair...
Of course, it's up to the judge to make such decisions, but fairness should be paramount, in my opinion...

Added after 10 minutes
The practice of setting the scores of participants who have played less than half of the games to zero has been confirmed by many tournaments, and I think creating a precedent like: "I can do whatever I want with the scores of such players" will not lead to anything good, in my opinion.
Модератор
all4heroes.net/forum
Он лежит на своих сокровищах,и в сердце его зависть и злоба. Не верь, что голова его склонилась во сне, если глаза его закрыты. Дракон не спит никогда.
0
⚖️
1
In reply to JackFromShadowLand
User Avatar
Offline Wistrit
Registered:
Posts: 11,962
#240
Auto-translated
I don't do whatever I want with the players' points; you just need to take a closer look. If you calculate everything without these points, the order of places will remain the same. But what if someone played against these 5, 7, 10, and so on players? Is it pleasant to part with the earned points?
The practice where the points of participants who have played less than half of the games are set to zero has been confirmed by many Tournaments.
I didn't want to remove Vsev from the table, but I also didn't want to let him pass to the next stage because he doesn't respond to messages in ICQ or to PMs on the forum. He didn't respond to me either. And if we follow the method of "removing everyone who has played less than 10 games," he wouldn't pass in any case. Without the points of "non-playing" players, the places after 8th: 9. JackFromShadowLand 10. Vip.rus 11. Leolopus 12. Lord Vampire 13. KillAndAction 14. Kitsune 15. VaRvArHawK - 9. JackFromShadowLand - 10. Vsev - 11. Vip.rus - 12. Leolopus - 13. Lord Vampire - 14. KillAndAction - 15. VaRvArHawk - 16. Kitsune Vsev is gone; is it much better now? If you remove all these points, those who played will be dissatisfied; I guarantee it. I am being asked to burn down the forest where bandits and refugees are hiding, without offending anyone in the process:rolleyes: I tried, and this is what I got.
2
⚖️
0
User Avatar
Offline JackFromShadowLand
Registered:
Posts: 68
#241
Auto-translated
So, those who played against players who played less than half of the games and scored, say, 2-3 points, get an advantage over those who didn't play against them and were automatically given a score of 1. It's simply accepted practice not to consider such players (less than half of the games), i.e., they are as if they didn't participate. That would be fairer, and the ranking would be different...
But all this is just a side note, for the future... Since a decision has been made, let it be. ;)
Модератор
all4heroes.net/forum
Он лежит на своих сокровищах,и в сердце его зависть и злоба. Не верь, что голова его склонилась во сне, если глаза его закрыты. Дракон не спит никогда.
0
⚖️
0
In reply to JackFromShadowLand
Offline Vip.rus
Registered:
Posts: 596
#242
Auto-translated
JackFromShadowLand
So, those who played against players who played less than half of the games and scored, say, 2-3 points, get an advantage over those who didn't play against them and were automatically given a score of 1. It would be fairer to simply not take such players (less than half of the games) into account, i.e., they would be considered as not participating. That way, the standings would be different...
But all this is just a side note, for the future... Since a decision has already been made, let it be. ;)

Let me give just one example to support your point about fairness!
Alex-NV made it to the next round, even though he didn't play against me and some other players, even though I messaged him without success! How can a player who refuses to play make it to the next round???!!! This is the first absurdity that comes to mind; I don't want to offend anyone personally:eek:
0
⚖️
0
In reply to Vip.rus
User Avatar
Offline KonServator
Registered:
Posts: 275
#243
Auto-translated
Vip.rus
Let me give just one example to support your words!
Alex-NV made it to the next round, even though he didn't play against me and some other players, even though I messaged him without any result! How can a player who refuses to play advance to the next round???!!! This is the first absurdity that comes to mind; I don't want to offend anyone personally:eek:

Actually, the stage lasted a month, so there was enough time, and everyone was in equal conditions. It's not very good to discuss individual players, but note that Alex also took a risk by not agreeing to play, because he was in 8th place and anyone could overtake him.
1
⚖️
0