I don't do whatever I want with the players' points; you just need to take a closer look. If you calculate everything without these points, the order of places will remain the same. But what if someone played against these 5, 7, 10, and so on players? Is it pleasant to part with the earned points?

The practice where the points of participants who have played less than half of the games are set to zero has been confirmed by many Tournaments.

I didn't want to remove Vsev from the table, but I also didn't want to let him pass to the next stage because he doesn't respond to messages in ICQ or to PMs on the forum. He didn't respond to me either. And if we follow the method of "removing everyone who has played less than 10 games," he wouldn't pass in any case. Without the points of "non-playing" players, the places after 8th: 9. JackFromShadowLand 10. Vip.rus 11. Leolopus 12. Lord Vampire 13. KillAndAction 14. Kitsune 15. VaRvArHawK - 9. JackFromShadowLand - 10. Vsev - 11. Vip.rus - 12. Leolopus - 13. Lord Vampire - 14. KillAndAction - 15. VaRvArHawk - 16. Kitsune Vsev is gone; is it much better now? If you remove all these points, those who played will be dissatisfied; I guarantee it. I am being asked to burn down the forest where bandits and refugees are hiding, without offending anyone in the process:rolleyes: I tried, and this is what I got.