Posts from Alternative rating.

So, each match is calculated sequentially, and the odds are constantly changing?

Yes, that's right.

I think it would be better to update the rating on the first page every time, or create a separate thread where there would be no discussions. Otherwise, the rating will get lost in the off-topic.

I think it would be better to update the rating every time on the first page - or create a separate thread - where there would be no discussions. Otherwise, the rating will get lost in the off-topic.

You surprised me =)
I'm waiting for a tool to create a beautiful table; I don't know HTML.

Complete statistics, including the number of wins and losses.

If possible, could you explain with a specific example how many points I would gain after (if I dare to dream...) defeating Britva – I currently have 1524, and he has 1740 – and how many points would be deducted after Kashu’s defeat, with him having 1481.

1) Kostyan - Britva

Britva wins
Britva +7 points
Kostyan -7 points

Kostyan wins
Kostyan +25 points
Britva -25 points

2) Britva - Cash

Britva wins
Britva +6 points
Cash -6 points

Cash wins
Cash +26 points
Britva -26 points

Treat tournament games the same way as seasonal ones, put everything together.

Said the main tournament organizer and Heroes expert! :smile40:

Added 9 minutes later
Voted "FOR". Interesting rating option. Stiky, do your thing. Normal people know how much time this takes and will appreciate your efforts!

Thank you for the innovation!

Where is ewgeniy in the table?

He didn't play in the Winter season and the tournaments that are currently ongoing.

It would be great to have complete statistics... the number of wins and losses, that is.

It's very difficult to do this manually, there are too many tags. SS-D has a program for this, but I don't, so you can find the statistics in his tables.

It's very difficult to do this manually, there are too many tags. SS-D has a program for this, but I don't, so you can find the statistics in his tables.

By the way, if the tournament is played using the Swiss system, then this rating can be taken into account directly in the program without any problems!

So, analyzing the results of the Alternative Ranking, I can conclude: Leader-Aldegir, with 9 games, 2 losses, and 7 wins...

Without specifically discussing Oleg-Aldegir, it just doesn't quite make sense that a player who won 7 games and lost 2 ends up ranked higher than Britvochka (Andrey), who has approximately 8 losses and around 30 wins...:smile11:

Slav, couldn't you tweak some kind of coefficient? :)

The ratio between 1st and 2nd place in terms of games is approximately:
wins-losses
Aldegir 7-2
Britvochka 32-8

In my opinion, we simply need to adjust the coefficient based on the number of games played, to reward dedication in Heroes. The more games played, the higher the coefficient should be (excluding games with a single opponent). Although a consistent sparring partner, even a higher-ranked one, may be at a similar level, because the player has played many games with them, each player will receive far fewer points than if they both played against a less experienced newcomer.:smile32:

Slav, don't take it the wrong way, I fully support your idea; I just want to optimize it (if possible).
Respect to a fellow countryman from our hometown (we are both from Staraya Oskol, in the Belgorod region)!:smile25:

Aldegira has 7 games, 2 losses, and 5 wins.

Come on, I think I've seen more. Check out Zima + tournaments.

In my opinion, the reward for activity in Heroes should be adjusted by tweaking the coefficient that depends on the number of games played.

Sorry, Pasha, but I definitely won't be making coefficients based on the number of games played. For me, this is the main drawback of the old rating system.
It's not about enthusiasm. Enthusiasm doesn't make more time appear for playing games =)

Well, I voted "For". It's a pretty good thing! ;) I just don't quite understand how I ended up higher than Kostyan or others, even though I only played 1 game!!!! and lost it)) even if it was a pit fight)) ;) =))

Well, I voted "Yes."
It's a pretty good thing! ;) I just don't quite understand how I ended up higher than Kostyan or others, even though I only played 1 game!!!! and lost it)) even if it was against Pit)) ;) =))

That's the whole point of the "Alternative Ranking"!
Play against strong players, and it will give you more points than if you play against weak players. Even if you lose, you will still be awarded points for playing against a strong opponent (and Pit is one of the strongest!). That's why you're higher in the table :) Stiky doesn't count based on the number of games, but on their "seriousness," if you can call it that! :)

RAPER
Based on a single game, it's impossible to form an opinion about skill level or assign a rating. But if you lose 10 games in a row, you'll be ranked lower than Kostyan :D