Skip to content

Posts from Controversial issues and their resolutions. Auto-translated

No ratings yet — be the first to rate!
User Avatar
#193
Auto-translated
I have 2 questions:
1. If on the sixth turn, the opponent captures a castle without a fight, does this count as encounter 116 and provide an opportunity to take a rest?
2. On turn 113 or 111, do the blue players have the right to take the corresponding rest against the red player?
В дикім полі
In reply to bRitvo4kA
User Avatar
#194
Auto-translated
bRitvo4kA
I have 2 questions:
1. If on the 6th turn, the opponent captures a castle without a fight, does it count as encounter 116 and provide an opportunity to take a restart?
2. On turn 113 or 111, does blue have the right to take the corresponding restart against red?

2. No. This is one of the advantages of the blue color – to take restarts last.

"Это нам идеально подходит!" [Новосибирск, 2013]
"Красавчик! Если только не читер.." [Киев, 2014]
"Это Вам не шутки - нажрался Dust в маршрутке" [Новокузнецк, 2015]
Сам ты фиш (с) :D
In reply to bRitvo4kA
User Avatar
#195
Auto-translated
bRitvo4kA
I have 2 questions:
1. If on the sixth turn, the opponent captures a castle without a fight, does this count as encounter 116 and provide an opportunity to take a rest?
2. On turn 113 or 111, do the blue players have the right to take the corresponding rest against the red player?

1. Yes - the rest must be taken.

2. No.
In reply to scorp
User Avatar
#196
Auto-translated
scorp
1. Yes - rest is mandatory.

2. No


Roger that!
С истиной где-то рядом...





Лето 2010.
In reply to Dirty_Player
User Avatar
#198
Auto-translated
Dirty_Player
Question: Is it possible to pass through this passage? (initially, there was no guard there).
And what are Manticores – are they a Global Object?
Тот, кто борется - может проиграть, кто нет - проиграл уже (с)
В прошлом "Координатор турниров Лиги Героев" (www.heroesleague.ru)
User Avatar
#199
Auto-translated
Judging by the map, the Scorpios are a good option, and going underground is as viable as going with the Cats. If there isn't a second Guardian Order slightly below, then it can be concluded that the path to the Metro is shifted. Since, according to the generated map (without a second Guardian Order), the path to the Metro should only be through the Scorpios...
Ушел с героев, пока пряники)
User Avatar
#200
Auto-translated
Message from Dirty_Player
Question: Is it possible to pass through this passage? (initially, there was no guard there).

IMHO.
Cats are indeed a game-breaking oversight, it seems. If this is the 2m4d(3) map, it needs to be replayed with an objective restart, because there is a direct passage (not through a junction, but simply through the secondary guard) between the opponents' native spawn points, bypassing the game-breaking oversight. This is a bug that potentially significantly affects the course of the game.
Стратегия - искусство возможного.

Первое правило форума :
"Хвалу и клевету приемли равнодушно
И не оспаривай глупца" (с)

Новичкам: ВНИМАТЕЛЬНО перечитайте ВЕСЬ первый пост по нижеприведенной ссылке и 90% ваших вопросов отпадут( на остальные 10% с удовольствием отвечу):
Правила онлайн игр
User Avatar
#201
Auto-translated
Generally, this is a secondary path for the player who is positioned above. The gargoyles simply moved the rock/forest to create space, which resulted in a passage forming below, and the road was then laid out through it. In other words, this should be interpreted as a bugged passage, which both players can, of course, use.
In reply to Wicc
User Avatar
#202
Auto-translated
Wicc
In other words, this should be interpreted as a bugged passage, which, of course, both players can use.
From the point of view of the rules, it should be interpreted exactly like that, but from the point of view of common sense – it’s nonsense! But we play according to the rules, so it is still possible to pass through it.
User Avatar
#203
Auto-translated
Generally, this is a secondary road belonging to the player above.
Isn't it a bit too definitive to say that?
After all, on the road section from the cat creatures to the gargoyles, there's an expected branch leading downwards – to the home town of the lower player, right? So, it's a connecting road, and it connects to the road belonging to the lower player.
Please clarify if I'm wrong...
Стратегия - искусство возможного.

Первое правило форума :
"Хвалу и клевету приемли равнодушно
И не оспаривай глупца" (с)

Новичкам: ВНИМАТЕЛЬНО перечитайте ВЕСЬ первый пост по нижеприведенной ссылке и 90% ваших вопросов отпадут( на остальные 10% с удовольствием отвечу):
Правила онлайн игр
In reply to Loi
User Avatar
#204
Auto-translated
loi
It seems like you can't state that so definitively, right?
After all, on the road section from the cats to the gargoyles, there could be a branch leading downwards – to the home town of the lower player? Then it would be a connecting road, and connected to the road from the lower player.
Please explain if I'm wrong...
1. In the picture, you can see a road leading downwards – one cell to the left of the gargoyles.
2. Vic, you know the template structure, right? How can you say that this is a secondary connecting road? Can there be one entrance from two players with the same guard? Isn't that a standard template?
3. Dirty Player... you write "from the point of view of the rules" – is it written like that in the rules? ;)
Дипломатия - искусство говорить собаке "хорошая собачка" до тех пор пока не найдешь подходящую палку.
User Avatar
#205
Auto-translated
1. The picture shows a path leading downwards – one cell to the left of the gargoyles.
Exactly! – you have a keen eye!
How can you say that this is an adjacent secondary path?
I said that it "might be an adjacent path, especially considering the path from the lower player," not Vic.
Is that what the rules say?
I understand that the rules allow everything that isn't prohibited.
And since there's no direct prohibition against passing through glitched paths, it's allowed!
P.S. But still, as a recommendation, it's best to replay if both sides agree. IMHO.
Стратегия - искусство возможного.

Первое правило форума :
"Хвалу и клевету приемли равнодушно
И не оспаривай глупца" (с)

Новичкам: ВНИМАТЕЛЬНО перечитайте ВЕСЬ первый пост по нижеприведенной ссылке и 90% ваших вопросов отпадут( на остальные 10% с удовольствием отвечу):
Правила онлайн игр
In reply to Captain
User Avatar
#206
Auto-translated
Captain
3. Dirty Player... you write "from the point of view of the rules" - is it written like that in the rules? ;)
Yes, Captain, yes!
5.12. It is forbidden to enter neighboring territories without breaking through the guard standing at the passage (i.e., if it is moved). If two or three guards are scattered along the road, any one can be broken through.
In the absence of a passage guard, including a moved one, it is allowed to freely move from one spawn point to another.
Read, learn, and don't be shy!
User Avatar
#208
Auto-translated
Basically, here’s the situation: someone named Vigo refuses to confirm my report /post/212847/, even though in that game, his main hero and all his troops were thoroughly defeated by mine. I don't have any save files left, but if necessary, I can provide logs from ICQ (although I'm not sure where they are located in the new version; as a last resort, I can take screenshots from the history). By the way, I already forgave him one match where he surrendered himself because I don't particularly enjoy winning without a fight. But this time, I ask that it be counted because the opponent has no proof of my dishonesty and cannot possibly have any (since I always play fairly), and a single crash during the game (and not even on my turn) is, as far as I understand, not grounds for refusing to acknowledge defeat. I respect his principles, but I see no reason why this match shouldn't be counted since I won absolutely fairly. If I hadn't been winning in the game, I wouldn't be asking for this. Honestly, I don't understand him; if I needed rating points at any cost, I probably wouldn't forgive him for losing one match. Please look into this fairly. For me, this is now a matter of principle. Thank you in advance.