Auto-translated
It’s actually good that a draw won’t satisfy our team. I hope they’ll be determined to fight and win. Our players don’t know how to play for a draw, and we don’t have a decent defensive game anyway.
In general, in my opinion, our main advantage is our fast-paced game. With so many good, mobile midfielders and quick passing in attack, we have good chances. Let Pavlyuchenko, who has a very narrow specialization (playing for rebounds and finishing crosses/through balls; he can’t dribble, his shot is weak, and he’s not fast; by the way, in the match against the Greeks, he often shot uselessly at the goal when he could have effectively passed), be in attack (by the way, it seems that Arshavin will play with the Swedes). Even in this specialization, he is far from 100% effective (probably not even 50%).
In general, no matter how much our team is criticized, the most frustrating thing is that they know how to play and can play well, but the game they showed, for example, in the friendly match against England, is very rare. With that kind of game, they can beat any team, but more often our players prefer to slowly pass the ball around the field.
P.S. Despite everything, we believe and hope, hope dies last...
I want it not to die...