Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Posts from A small pub near Fludoscarr.Auto-translated
Отдай свои прошлые сны, В сомненьях себя обрети, В бешеном танце душа кружится! Не думай, что будет потом, Здесь и сейчас мы живем, Стань хоть на миг сам собой, слышишь!
You know, I wasn't wrong to put a "Wikipedia user" userbar on my profile. You shouldn't be 100% sure about the accuracy of the information, but at least you can listen to it. And here's what we can read about the definition of "flood":
Flood, or rarely flad (from English flood /flʌd/ – "flood") – idle talk, messages in internet forums and chats that take up (in many cases) large amounts of space, or, conversely, consist of one word or several characters and do not contain any new, useful, or meaningful information. Sometimes, any off-topic is called a flood. For a chat, "flood" is the repetition in the chat of one or more similar phrases, more often than one message every certain period of time set by the moderators (for many chats, it is equal to 3 minutes).
In principle, this information is not new for most people. But let's see what is written further:
Flood spreads both as a result of an excess of free time and with the aim of trolling – for example, out of a desire to annoy someone. Netiquette condemns flood and flame, as they hinder communication, mutual assistance, and the exchange of information. On many internet forums, special separate sections and topics are created "for flood", so that flooders do not spread their activities to other sections and topics.
I don't know how applicable this is to our forum, but in general, it turns out that the "flood" section is created so that people can actually flood and write messages that do not carry great semantic load...
O God of Earth and Altar, Bow down and hear our cry, Our earthly rulers falter, Our people drift and die, The walls of gold entomb us, The swords of scorn divide, Take not thy thunder from us, Take away our pride.
So, how does the voting work? Everyone who participates lists 10 topics they consider to be the worst. Then, the votes are counted, and a request is submitted to the moderators.
Hmm... I haven't seen any large, rambling posts here yet. But there are some small ones... By the way, that's basically why we have the General Chat and the Tavern. The General Chat is for everyone, and the Tavern is for reasonable (with a bit of meaning) rambling (conversation)).
P.S. Timi, 10 is too little. It's better to wait for someone else... because the voting ended a long time ago.
I don't know how applicable this is to our forum, but in general, it turns out that the "off-topic" section is created so that people can actually engage in off-topic discussions and write messages that don't carry great semantic weight...
Everything is fine, but the conclusion is a little off. The off-topic section is created for free communication; it should be less strictly monitored by moderators, and I quote the section description: "OFF-TOPIC - A subforum for discussing any topic, so as not to create off-topic discussions in the other sections." And it's not without reason that the post counter is disabled here. Now let's move on to the topic. Ar, you say that the admin doesn't have time for all this... did he tell you that personally? +)
Hmm... I haven't seen any large, off-topic posts here yet. But there are small ones... By the way, that's why we need the General Chat and the Tavern. The General Chat is for everyone, and the Tavern is for reasonable (with a meaningful load) off-topic discussions.
P.S. Timi, 10 is too little. It's better to wait for someone... because the voting ended a long time ago.
Ha! Of course, there's so much meaningful content here... are you feeling a headache? Because I see you're having such intelligent conversations – it's like the intelligentsia is here.
I don’t understand why there has to be meaningful content in the Flood section. In general, in sections like this one, what members of HeroesWorld like also often lacks any meaningful content. For example, what do I care what Lёlya or Arandor like (don’t take the mention of members personally, it’s just an example). And you’re talking about meaningful content.
As for Lёlya: I see no point in participating in an argument, since I believe this topic given to us for debate is ill-considered, no common conclusion can be reached in it, and it’s impossible to convince anyone either. Especially since this argument touches on understanding the world only in its everyday perception, not purely about science — that’s not how you debate science. If your conscience allows and you wish, you may consider me defeated.
Борьба и единство противоположностей - вечный двигатель мира сего.
To: Lyolya. I don't see the point in participating in this argument, as I believe the topic is not well-suited for a debate between us, and it's impossible to reach a common opinion or convince anyone. Moreover, this argument only touches upon the perception of the world in everyday life, and scientific discussions are not conducted in this way. If your conscience allows, and you have the desire, you can acknowledge that I have won.
Okay, I'll soon put a bright red inscription in my signature, size 5: "I'm not Lyolya! I'm Lelya!"... calm down, inhale, exhale... Yes, the topic is indeed incorrect; I said it myself – we both just ruined each other's arguments.
Тими
Arandor
