Skip to content

Posts from Siverfale vs Kitty

No ratings yet — be the first to rate!
User Avatar
#1
Auto-translated
PLEASE, NO ONE BUT THE PARTICIPANTS IN THE DEBATE SHOULD POST ANYTHING HERE!
Topic: Which is better: living in ancient times or in our time?
Kitty is trying to prove that it is better in our time.
Siverfale is trying to prove that it is better in ancient times.
Please behave respectfully and with dignity, as this is just a game.
Умирает не тот, кто устал, а тот, кто остановился.
User Avatar
#2
Auto-translated
I have a question: how flexible is the concept of the word "antiquity"? What are the approximate timeframes?
Where do we go?
Where do we end up when we save the world?
In reply to Siverfale
User Avatar
#3
Auto-translated
Siverfale;169626
I have a question: how flexible is the concept of the word "ancient"? Approximate timeframes.
Well... um... roughly up to the 18th century.
Умирает не тот, кто устал, а тот, кто остановился.
In reply to Agilist
User Avatar
#4
Auto-translated
Well, here we go again;)
Let's start with the fact that people have established more or less peaceful relations with each other, wars are no longer breaking out, and countries are helping each other. Although things aren't perfect yet, it's still better than in the past.
Secondly, humanity has acquired one of the most important things in the world – knowledge. We have become more careful about nature and are trying to heal the wounds we have inflicted upon it.
Thirdly, we have more comfortable living conditions, with all sorts of vacuum cleaners and refrigerators appearing, and it has become easier for people to communicate – through e-mail, ICQ, or even telephones.
So back off your rules,
Back off your jive!
Cause I'm sick of not living,
To stay alive,
Leave me alone!
I'm not asking a lot -
I just don't want to be controlled,
That's all I want.
All I want!
(с)The Offspring
User Avatar
#5
Auto-translated
Of course, the old days were better because reason was more important than strength! ;) :D :D
Let's start with the fact that people have already established more or less peaceful relations with each other, wars are no longer breaking out, and countries are helping each other. Although things are not perfect here yet, it is still better than in the past.
That's not true; wars have been, are, and probably will continue to be. Just turn on the TV, and you can see what's happening in the world. And now, let's take a history textbook and see that most of the wars back then occurred with intervals of 40 years...
Secondly, humanity has acquired one of the most important things in the world – knowledge. We have become more careful about nature, healing the wounds we have inflicted on it.

But there were no such wounds back then. In the sense, NONE AT ALL. Now, even in the most remote villages, you can smell gasoline...
Thirdly, we have more comfortable living conditions, there are all sorts of vacuum cleaners and refrigerators, and it has become easier for people to communicate – through e-mail and ICQ or even phones.
But what has this civilization given humanity? You know, Kitty, here are some statistics for the last 150 years:
Transportation speed has increased more than a thousandfold.
A person's energy capacity has increased at least a thousandfold.
The amount of weapons has increased millions of times...
Do you feel the trend?
And now, let's remember the past, when men spent years trying to get a simple kiss from a girl (and now, let's go outside and ask any 18-year-old girl how many she has SIMPLY kissed... Most of them won't even be able to remember); those were truly the days of romance (at least, after the 15th century). Let's not talk about the "dark ages," the Middle Ages, and so on; let's look at the best part of the "old days." Despite the "primitiveness" of those times, there were many more people who made their names in history; most bright minds and talents are unlikely to be found now. Jack Sparrow said it best in the third part of "Pirates." Jack was told that there were fewer PEOPLE (in capital letters) now, and the world had somehow shrunk. He replied:
"No, the world is still the same. There is just less... content."
Let's remember the good old 17th century, when anyone who was dissatisfied with the old order, anyone who wanted to change their life, went west, on a long voyage, hoping to build a new world without the flaws of the old one. To America (this is already the 18th century, but I will take it only as a successful example), the smartest and most desperate people went – and they built a completely new society; they managed to create democracy, not to bend to the king as before. The others had the same opportunities, but excessive exploitation of the local population destroyed them in the most naive way imaginable. But we are talking about the fact that they COULD build a new life. Now it is impossible to do that. Hence, the dissatisfaction. Hence, the psychoses, suicides, schizophrenia...
Sorry if I am too assertive in expressing my point of view; I just don't know how to do it any other way. :(

Added after 15 hours and 3 minutes
That's how it is
Where do we go?
Where do we end up when we save the world?
In reply to Siverfale
User Avatar
#6
Auto-translated
What has this civilization given to humanity? You know, Kitty, here are some statistics for the last 150 years:
The speed of transport has increased more than a thousandfold.
The energy capacity of a person has increased at least a thousandfold.
The number of weapons has increased millions of times...
Do you feel the trend?
I do. People invented and improved everything before us, and now we, the selfish ones, are using it:D Back then, when these weapons, transport, and household appliances were being invented and upgraded, people used imperfect and even dangerous equipment (take, for example, the history of matches:)). Now, all these things are much more convenient, although their evolution will probably continue, and only a couple of centuries separate us from vacuum cleaner refrigerators with a built-in organizer and an MP3 player:).
Just don't blame me for disrespecting previous generations; the question is, when was it better to live?
Oh yes, and by the way, you forgot that the discussion about antiquity here only lasts until the 18th century. And 150 years ago was when?
Exactly.
Now let's remember the past, when men spent years trying to get a simple kiss from a girl (and now let's go outside and ask any 18-year-old girl how many she has SIMPLY kissed... Most of them won't even be able to remember), that was truly an era of romance (at least after the 15th century).
For some, this is also romance... It's a relative concept. Maybe in a hundred years, we will consider what is happening now to be romantic.
Let's remember the good old 17th century, when anyone who was dissatisfied with the old ways, anyone who wanted to change their life, went west, on a long voyage, where they hoped to build a new world, without the flaws of the old one. To America (this is already the 18th century, but I will take it only as a successful example), the smartest and most desperate people went - and they built a completely new society, they managed to create democracy, and not bow down to the king as before. The rest had the same chances, but excessive exploitation of the local population destroyed them in the most naive way imaginable. But we are talking about the fact that they COULD build a new life. Now it is impossible to do that. Hence the dissatisfaction. Hence the psychoses, suicides, schizophrenia....
Why is it impossible? We get into a spaceship and look for a new planet:)
Sorry if I'm too assertive in expressing my point of view, I just can't do it any other way.
Not at all... I don't care, express yourself however you want, I won't be offended:)
So back off your rules,
Back off your jive!
Cause I'm sick of not living,
To stay alive,
Leave me alone!
I'm not asking a lot -
I just don't want to be controlled,
That's all I want.
All I want!
(с)The Offspring
User Avatar
#7
Auto-translated
Secondly, humanity has acquired one of the most important things in the world – knowledge. We have become more careful about nature, healing the wounds we have inflicted upon it.
But back then, there were no such wounds. In the sense, there were absolutely none. Now, even in the most remote villages, you can smell gasoline...
You can feel it. People invented and improved everything before us, and we, as egoists, are now taking advantage of it. Back then, when these weapons, vehicles, and household appliances were invented and upgraded, people used imperfect and even dangerous equipment (take, for example, the history of matches). Now, all these things are much more convenient, although their evolution will probably continue, and only a couple of centuries separate us from vacuum-cleaning refrigerators with a built-in organizer and an MP3 player.
No, I meant in general that all the development of our civilization is aimed at increasing the number and power of weapons more than anything else. As for the 150 years, it's just that there are no more accurate data compared to other times, but in general, the picture is clear.
For some, even this is romantic... It's a relative concept. Maybe, in a hundred years, we will consider something romantic that is not romantic now.
But that's unlikely, because below that, it's only the "communal wives" project, and even that is relative, so it's unlikely to be considered romantic – the concept of this word has remained largely the same over the past 800 years.
Why can't it be done? We get into a spaceship and look for a new planet.
Well, for now, it's science fiction; conquering the New World was something completely different.
Regarding assertiveness, in the previous argument, you said:
Okay, okay. I give up. The arguments are over. Stop pressuring me.
So, I thought, maybe it seems to you that I am communicating uncivilizedly. :)
Where do we go?
Where do we end up when we save the world?
In reply to Siverfale
User Avatar
#8
Auto-translated
Back then, there were no such wounds. I mean, NONE. Now, even in the most remote villages, you can smell gasoline...
There were, there were. Maybe not as significant, but they still existed. For example, farmers in Australia long ago exterminated Tasmanian wolves because they thought they were destroying livestock:(. Although, in principle, I agree with you.
Well, if this is a hint that I don't like nature, take a look at my userbar :-)
Well, for now, it's science fiction; conquering the New World is something else entirely.
Back then, that was also considered science fiction. Isn't it scary to set off across the ocean when a storm could happen at any moment? What if there's no continent there at all?:)
But that's unlikely because below that is only the "General" project, and even that is relative, so it's unlikely to be considered romantic – the concept of this word has remained largely the same over the past 800 years.
Have you seen any romance among Neanderthals?:) At least now, we don't eat our relatives for breakfast if there's nothing else (although, again, who knows:) ). Besides, women are no longer considered unworthy, and men are no longer elevated to the level of gods.
Regarding assertiveness, in the previous argument, you said:
Okay, okay. I give up. I'm out of arguments. Stop pressuring me.
So, I thought maybe you think I'm communicating uncivilizedly.You misunderstood;)
So back off your rules,
Back off your jive!
Cause I'm sick of not living,
To stay alive,
Leave me alone!
I'm not asking a lot -
I just don't want to be controlled,
That's all I want.
All I want!
(с)The Offspring
User Avatar
#9
Auto-translated
They did, they did. Perhaps not as significant, but they still existed. For example, farmers in Australia long ago exterminated Tasmanian wolves because they thought they were destroying livestock. Although, in principle, I agree with you.
In those glorious times, it was possible to destroy entire herds of animals (not to mention that they probably could have destroyed even more people) without fearing the extinction of the species:)
Back then, it was also considered science fiction. Isn't it scary to sail across the ocean when a storm could happen at any moment? And what if there is no continent there at all?
Back then, it was already known that there was land there (Columbus discovered America before the 18th century) where one could live and grow plants. Now we don't have special domes or underground complexes for living even on the moon, let alone other planets.
Have you seen any romance among Neanderthals? At least now we don't eat our own kind for breakfast if there's nothing else (although, again, who knows). Besides, women are no longer considered unworthy, and men are no longer elevated to the level of gods.
Let's not dwell on Neanderthals :) I'm saying, let's talk about the heyday of "antiquity"
And what about our civilization's tendency towards militarism? I think almost everyone knows that the amount of weapons currently on Earth is enough to destroy all life (or at least irreparably destroy biological chains, ecosystems, and other "trifles").
Where do we go?
Where do we end up when we save the world?
User Avatar
#10
Auto-translated
The definition of genocide according to the UN Convention: Genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

- killing members of the group;
- causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
- deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
- imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
- forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
Sorry, I couldn't resist. I just wanted to say that this term doesn't apply to animals. I was just getting a bit worked up.
Первый, кто был забанен за Правду.
User Avatar
#12
Auto-translated
In those glorious times, one could exterminate entire hordes of animals (not to mention that they could probably exterminate just as many people) without fear of the species becoming extinct.
Indeed... The fact is that by the time the British arrived on the mainland, almost nothing (or rather, no one) remained of the marsupial wolves.
Regarding animals that are man-eaters: Here's another plus in favor of our time: now animals are afraid of humans and do not attack us. Only in self-defense, and even then, they usually run away.
What about our civilization's focus on military matters? I think almost everyone knows that the weapons currently on Earth are enough to destroy all life (or at least irreparably destroy biological chains, ecosystems, and other "minor" things").
We just need to be careful in how we use it, and that's all. In ancient times, half of the materials went into all sorts of weapons.
Back then, it was already well known that there was land (Columbus discovered America before the 18th century) where one could live and grow plants. Now, we don't even have special domes or underground complexes for living on the moon, let alone other planets.
Just wait a little longer, and we will. In the meantime, you can hide deep in the jungle, settle in the Sahara, or live in Antarctica. There are still unexplored corners of the Earth.
Loken;170471
The definition of genocide according to the UN Convention:

Genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

- killing members of the group;
- causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
- deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
- imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
- forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.


Sorry, I couldn't resist. I just wanted to say that this term does not apply to animals. I was just being sarcastic.
Thank you for the clarification
So back off your rules,
Back off your jive!
Cause I'm sick of not living,
To stay alive,
Leave me alone!
I'm not asking a lot -
I just don't want to be controlled,
That's all I want.
All I want!
(с)The Offspring
User Avatar
#13
Auto-translated
Yeah... The thing is, by the time the British arrived on the mainland, there was practically nothing (or rather, no one) left of the marsupial wolves.
Regarding animals that are man-eaters: here's another point in favor of our time: now animals are afraid of humans and don't attack us. Only in self-defense, and even then, they usually run away.
Yes, I know about the marsupial wolves, but for now, it seems to be the only "relatively" safe species that was completely exterminated by humans in ancient times. It gained wider scale later...
And regarding the absence of man-eating animals, there are simply almost none left...
Just try to handle it carefully, and that's it. But in ancient times, half of the materials went into all sorts of weapons.
There will always be enough stupid people who underestimate the power of the weapon they possess, and that's when (considering the extremely unstable situation in the world, not like 500 years ago) a spectacular (or maybe not so spectacular) apocalypse will occur.
Just wait a little longer, and there will be... But for now, you can hide deep in the jungle, settle in the Sahara, or live in Antarctica. There are still unexplored corners of the Earth.
But you can't build a new society there, unlike in the New World. And by the way, how can we reach for the stars when there is still so much to do on Earth, starting with exploring the same jungles and ending with the same wars and diplomatic conflicts? The development of human civilization has led it to a complete finish; moral values are collapsing, drugs and alcohol are flowing in an endless stream, the Cold War continues (find 5 differences from the current situation and from the times of the Cold War) - everything is heading towards a collapse.
Where do we go?
Where do we end up when we save the world?