Posts from Which race would you add to Heroes?

Then it's the race of the element of fire! Salamanders, efreets, fire elementals, sphinxes, phoenixes...

And there could live, for example, wandering orcs, outcast elves, gray paladins, healing liches, and someone else. And they would fight only for themselves. And for money.:cool:

No. The race of neutrals must be neutral!
You can just come up with a race that is against both good and evil. Its main goal is to conquer land, as a result, the forces of good and the forces of evil decide to unite!

Correct! You can even come up with an interesting campaign for this story, about the struggle of irreconcilable enemies with a universal enemy, and in the end, evil would give strength to good and remain the only race on earth!

Only in alliance with evil (if you are good) or vice versa. In scenarios, then let 2 races (let's say humans and Necropolis) fight against the invaders! Without an alliance, it is impossible.

The point is that this should be a single race, and not just separate units from different races. And Alkonost is a bird with a woman's face, capable of predicting the future. Let's have feminism!

Nonsense! It turns out not to be a full-scale war between Good and Evil, but rather a sandbox battle. The kids were playing, and then – bam – strangers showed up, and all the representatives of the kindergarten united in a sacred struggle against a common enemy. I'm not against a neutral race, but uniting everyone against this race is illogical. Imagine: Nazi Germany united with the USSR against neutral Switzerland. Others should fight against the neutrals, but not in an alliance.

I only suggested a short-lived, powerful race needed solely for a fundamental new development of the plot. Which could completely change the concept of the game, for example: during the war of all united races against the invading race, it turns out that humans are cowardly creatures, not ready to sacrifice part of their numerous army, Necropolis is a race that bravely charged into battle, but without support from its allies, it found itself on the verge of destruction, and so on.

It smells like racism. Only in our case, the superior race is not the Aryans, but the undead. And also, a new race is needed to make the game more interesting and multifaceted, but not to prove that the undead are better than "subhumans" - humans.

So, what kind of faction do we want? I believe that a new faction should be new, but have its distant roots or a connection to other factions. That's why I suggest either a neutral faction – where representatives of all factions are present – or an Amazon faction – and female units from other factions would be outcasts among the Amazons.

It's better to have neutral factions and neutral creatures consisting of representatives of various races who have abandoned the ideology of fighting for world domination, rather than a super-aggressive race that has challenged everyone and forced eternal enemies to unite, as Joker and others suggest.

It's not necessary (I said so because I like the Necropolis faction), you can do the opposite and make it so that people performed a heroic deed, and the Necropolis didn't support them.
And there's no racism here!:mad:

Humans defeated the undead – that’s a feat! And you don’t need to invent a new race for a feat. A new race should only diversify the game, but not unite fundamentally incompatible races as allies – the undead and humans.

The aggressive race – the remnants of the orcs! And why not, they hate everyone, especially mages!

As a plot development, it could work. You could also create an aggressor race from the existing ones. Inferno, Necropolis, and Dungeon would be good candidates for this role. But it seems my idea won't be supported...:(

I agree, Inferno, Necropolis, and Dungeon are all suitable as aggressors.